Jump to content

Benfro

Members
  • Posts

    162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by Benfro

  1. ITT: @Phoenyx continues to bloviate and we argue about the point of FA.

    I support @Cooper_ 's commentary up-thread - this is all a game that revolves around war, much like every other nation sim in existence. Phoenyx continually talking about endlessly investigating is absolute garbage, we aren't here to sit around for months on end watching paint dry. There was verifiable intel, we acted on the intel, there were unspoken treaties activated, and the dogpile resulted in us getting our butts kicked. We acknowledged that and tried to make the best of the situation by fighting on and making FA plans for the future.

    FA has lots of goals, and and the end of the day, it is all about making OOC friendships while juggling IC agreements and disagreements. It is continually making and breaking treaties, spheres, and allies of all kinds. End of the day, dynamic gameplay is the key to having fun. You bet, as the leader of TKR, that I'd love to have TKR on the winning side of a global sometime in the near future. It's been far too long. Our members are tired of turreting. But the response to that is not withdrawing from global FA, nor is it doing everything in our power to avoid war. I disagree that the goal is to avoid conflict all together - it is about putting the AA in the best position now and in the future for success.

    • Upvote 2
  2. 50 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:

    There are small wars, perhaps some pirates attacking, perhaps 2 Alliances going at it, and then there are big, global wars. The small ones, perhaps not worth too much attention, but a global, that involves a -lot- of Alliances and I definitely think there are some lessons we can still learn from it. Ofcourse, it takes 2 to tango. If no one else is investigating certain loose ends from the war, then that'll be the end of it. 

    There have been an average of more than 2 global wars per calendar year that this game has existed. This is nothing new and how the game works.

    • Upvote 5
  3. 1 hour ago, Micchan said:

    Number of nations and score (assuming everyone is militarized), there is no subjective way to evaluate it, if you don't think you have the quality then it's your fault

    "We are less active and we are less competent so we're allowed to be more" is something I've heard from a certain block in the past :ph34r:

    Additionally, Quack opted to include HedgeMoney in the happenings, creating an already imbalanced front against us. So can't just lean on "well Swamp was less active and less experienced." RoseLot joined because of a silent paperless MDP that had no need other than feeling left out.

    And yes I skipped some posts. I'm trying to keep this relatively on topic instead of dealing with Fist's personal attacks against Parti.

    • Upvote 2
  4. 1 hour ago, BlackBeard said:

    As a person who’s threw his fair share of both weapons. They are  absolutely fine. 
     

    if anything iron dome is op. Nothing needs to be changed. 

    Wonder if there is a way to give players an option - more potential infra damage with a higher likelihood of being blocked vs. lower damage but more reliable. 
     

    im thinking instead of nerfing ID completely, make it only 25% or 33% effective against a missile with max 200 infra damage?

    • Upvote 1
  5. 5 minutes ago, Phoenyx said:

    Now I grant you, Sphinx' log really does make it seem like Swamp, TCW and HM were going to hit you guys first, but the more I've read, the more I think that at best, Sphinx misunderstood what these Coalitions were actually trying to do (a protective pact, not an offensive one) and at worst was being purposefully deceitful. Still hoping that RSD's fellow HM leader could clarify what he heard from Swamp and perhaps even who he heard it from. To date, however, we don't have -anyone- from Swamp saying they were actually contemplating an offensive pact.

    Gotta jump in here to say - are you, @Phoenyx, intending to have alternating posts until this thread dies? You seem to come in and restate the same questions regardless of what is said.

    But you are right. Wouldn't it be nice if someone from HM's leadership or Swamp's leadership could come and publicly state their views to clarify how all of this happened? And, again, as it feels like half of my allied leadership has stated recently, a defensive and offensive pact are amorphous and almost identical in execution. Even more valuable here is the silent agreements. We have fought many a lengthy war over secret ties and they never end well.

    • Upvote 4
  6. Wait did you seriously accuse any of us of ad hom attacks after you have continually evaded the swear filters and referenced us competing in the Special Olympics multiple times? Go pound sand somewhere, dude.
    Or message @Alex about turning off your VM timer so at least you can participate in the game instead of running away from us all. 

    • Upvote 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.