TRM

It pains me to see that they declared attrition, but it's delightful at the same time, lmfao.

Not the point. In this particular instance, the projects were tested in the test server, and therefore does it rly matter? It just seems like yall are trying nitpick anything loose and turn it into something major.

For the people talking about pre leaking shit. I'm pretty sure that all those projects were in the test server b4 they were implemented into the game, so whose fault is it that yall weren't keen enough and didn't hear about em b4 they got implemented.

Sheepy: So Valk, how many multis do u have? Valk: Yes!

So, how's the war going guys? Lmao

Finally!

You'll learn why once you get hit by heavy downdeclares. Or you won't, and you'll just lose steel. We will see.

For example, let's just say that declaring attrition on opponents with no infra is not the best possible idea. That's just one example.

Not sure anyone is arguing if it was a success or not. But from what I saw, it was a step below what a great blitz should be.

That nation should try and blockade with negative 4 ships. Hehe

Something tells me that this treaty would be great right about now.

Those numbers seem a bit low.

I can't tell if you are sarcastic or not.

I wonder how many downvotes this thread would receive had we still had downvotes, lmfao.

LOL

A very terrible idea.

Praise be, oh bright bishop. Show us The Light, for we yearn to know The Way!

Oh look, a pixel hugger!

They already declared more wars than Poolaris did when they hit Co A. The Great Boris shall prevail!

I wanna like this, but I don't like this. Regardless, F.

@Alex

Why do I doubt that the alliances that ran 100/100 contributed the most to the game(in terms of irl $$$)?

RIP Charlie 2k20

Has a wiki been made yet? How many nations is KT fighting?

Okay