gerry oldsworth III

Truely awful, 100% would not recommend to anyone else. 10/10 thank you for your service o7

Happy Anniversary!

haha! i made the perfect meme for this hours ago, and shall now post it in every forum i can to get attention!

(all fun and games btw)

75 is a sweet spot where it's pretty much balanced, speaking as a c28 who had to shed almost all my infra and buy money off the market to compensate for the amount i lose because of my low infra. (and most of us just want to see this whole matter dropped cause almost every update the mod team wants to change that modifier and it never fixes any of the underlying issues)

@His Holy DecagonThis is despicable, now that I think back you didn't pay me back my taxes either! #CancelDeca

Best FA move of 2022, congrats

dnn

Why dont you put a captcha on spyoping someone to stop people from scraping but still letting people find spy counts manually? Maybe even bring back the old spy success system.

And even worse, the actual treaty did include the bit about everything being in private, which llo has just broken (again), along with this being a forum post which breaks rule 2 which was in the real treaty. So please LLO keep the good word of waffles out of your mouth

It could be like taxes, the alliance takes a certain percent of the nations military. Then the nation cant access it so that it forces alliances to be more cohesive and act quicker. imo you shouldn't put a limit on the amount you can send or the time that you can send them so that we can have huge proxy wars start between two tiny nations with like 1mil troops (but still require the nations to foot most of the bill for these troops or make a limit where it costs more to keep them). This would also add an element to the early parts of wars where an alliance can stockpile troops to counter a blitz. Then you could put a troop trading system, where large nations could sell their military on the market for a quick buck. Or alliances could support eachother in proxy wars through massive trades like the trade system we have now (like the rss trade but with soldiers, imagine the amount of meta gaming and stuff we could do with that). (and allow alliances to send these troops to anyone willing to accept the trade for them) And even if you've sold your troops on a lease you still have them taking up your capacity. And instead of the troops being stored in an alliance bank sort of thing, they could be stored in a nation where the alliance chooses to send them (where that nation could not send them out if blockaded). sorry if none of this makes any sense, I'm really really tired

no leaks

o7

Looking forward to a good fight! Hope that HoF is ready to take on the largest high tier hegemony in the game.

your wish has been granted, however the hegemon johnsons will not take lightly to your assumption that this list will ever move.

But this doesnt really count as a war right? like out of all the dogpiles we've seen over the last 2 years this HAS to be the worst one. My heart goes out to all those in HM who have to deal with such tyrannical opponents #StopJohnsonsHegemony

Thanks for not addressing anyones concerns or questions llo and lovin! rather amusing.

... did you even read the agreement lovin? It very clearly lays out exactly what would happen and how, and we have followed it to the letter. So anyways lovin, please stop being stupid - Waffle house econ team (oh and for the rebuild, that bit is a straight up lie and they did get rebuild so if you want facts, you know, dont talk to lovin :P)

does any of this even slightly matter?

testing my new signature dont mind me

I do not know any of you well enough, but i must say that it is impressive for an alliance to last this long and maintain being this stable, i look forward to meeting you guys properly and for the 10 year anniversary!

It truely is a muppet eat muppet world

at this point why doesnt alex just make the ads run automatically and give us 2 mil more a day