Jump to content

Darzy

Members
  • Content Count

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

34 Excellent

About Darzy

  • Rank
    Casual Member

Profile Information

  • Leader Name
    Darzy7
  • Nation Name
    Xtremeities
  • Nation ID
    109464

Contact Methods

  • Discord Name
    Darzy7#0576

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Darzy

    Typhon Run By Tyrant

    Find me a better one, or else it will be best thread 21st century...
  2. Darzy

    Terminus Est, Re-Declaration of War

    Brilliant
  3. Darzy

    Typhon Run By Tyrant

    Very interesting. I'd never heard of that before.
  4. Darzy

    Time to Play Hardball

    I am so confused.
  5. Darzy

    Declaration of war on Nova Riata

    Holy fricking shit, what is that
  6. Darzy

    Typhon Run By Tyrant

    How do you delete a city?
  7. Darzy

    Global War Peace Terms - Discussion

    While playing it cool is usually the better option, I'm not sure that they're truly wrong in wanting to wrap things up. Perma-global-war seems unhealthy for this game, at least from my perspective. Many will quit, as someone said a while ago about 'vacillators' or something, ordinary players who make up the masses in this game. Now I get it, many people think that that's good, it would leave only quality players behind, willing to fight to a bitter end, or no end at all even. However, the game wouldn't grow, it would just be the same old people if we were in permawar between the same people, no change of scenery and no dynamic interplay between allies and enemies. For example, say peace comes about at this moment. Everyone knows what the dynamic will be then, a $yndisphere vs IQ power struggle, sides of similar strength. While I can't predict the result, the ensuing conflict will at least be INTERESTING. All I can say is, as a non-participant in this war, the longer it goes on, the less I am interested in the politics of this game, not saying that I reflect the views of everyone, but I am saying that peace for a short while may be better for the game than a 3/4/5 month war.
  8. Darzy

    Peace in our time.

    Weird peace but ok
  9. Darzy

    Politics and... War?

    Thanks guys, your thoughts have been duly noted. Thanks for showing me this post, gives me a whole new perspective on how this game has formed over time, especially considering that it only happened about a year and a half ago.
  10. Darzy

    Politics and... War?

    Hello, to anyone who may read this. This game seems to be called, 'politics and war' to describe how the game should be played, using politics, and war to continue that politics I guess. However, not everyone really plays the game this way, for example, until recently many people outside of certain fighting alliances have sat and simply grown their nation. That being said, many of these people have been criticised for this playstyle, with the critics citing the name of the game as 'politics and war' not 'politics and peace' or some other form. However, with an economic approach to the game clearly being allowed or even it could be said, encouraged, one would think that, 'Politics, Economics and War' would be a more apt description of this game if one were truly desiring to briefly summarise the game in a few words. If the game were truly about politics and war, it would be much more military focused I believe, with say, 6 barracks 6 factories 7 hangars and 4 drydocks cap for example, so that people could demonstrate their true dedication of their resources into military might. Instead, there exists a 5/5/5/3 setup which every nation takes into war, backed by their AA bank, showing a more economic approach to conserving resources and managing stockpiles that allow every player, not just the military madmen, to be putting their entire nation's effort into war. Now, net damage is generally a good way of separating the two types of people, however, my point is, if the game really were 50% war as the name suggests, then I don't think it is a problem with the people who choose not to war, but the lack of factors in game that make it 50% war instead of 33% as suggested above. My point basically is, many like to blame people for not all loving 'politics and war.' However, if there exists as many un-warlike playstyles as war-like playstyles, those other playstyles should be given a voice too instead of being rejected due to the name of the game being too simplistic. I do understand this is much, much less catchy. (P,E&W?) However, I'd just like to understand and hear others' thoughts on why the economic side of the game was not featured in the title.
  11. Darzy

    Ayy LM4O

    lmao
  12. Darzy

    Orbis United Alliances

    @everyone Attention all PnW Gamers, ORBIS UNITED ALLIANCES is in great danger, and needs YOUR help to MUTE all the channels in the server. To do this, they need A WORKING GOV. To help them, all they need is your credit card number, the three numbers on the back, and the expiration month and date. But you gotta be quick so that ORBIS UNITED ALLIANCES can secure those credits, and achieve the epic victory R O Y A L.
  13. Darzy

    Orbis United Alliances

    IT HAS BEEN DECREED ON ORBIS UNITED ALLIANCES THAT INFRA IS NOW BANNED, SELL DOWN OR BE ROLLED
  14. Darzy

    Orbis United Alliances

    RIOT RIOT RIOT RIOT RIOT
  15. Darzy

    Bittersweet End

    ^ this, an alliance such as Camelot has no reason to destroy their reputation over 50 million, heck, even if it were 50 billion it still wouldn't be worth it. This looks more like a failed attempt to defame Camelot than anything else, stay safe Creed!
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.