Jump to content

Flame of the Flawed

Members
  • Content count

    178
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Flame of the Flawed last won the day on November 18 2016

Flame of the Flawed had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

267 Excellent

2 Followers

About Flame of the Flawed

  • Rank
    I'm Special

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Interests
    $
  • Alliance Pip
    The Syndicate
  • Leader Name
    Flame of the Flawed
  • Nation Name
    Ascendance of Man
  • Nation ID
    9492
  • Alliance Name
    The Syndicate

Recent Profile Visitors

901 profile views
  1. Flame of the Flawed

    The Ayyslamic Caliphate posts

    Oh man, that brings back some memories. And yes, your surprise protection will be a great asset for the greater good of the Syndicate Corporation. Old school. Most of our wars were fought that way, and they seemed to always involve the most fun.
  2. Flame of the Flawed

    Pantheon is back in the game :D

    FACT: Zeebrus has always pulled the strings behind the Syndicate. ...those with open eyes will see...
  3. Flame of the Flawed

    Pantheon is back in the game :D

    Heh, I should clarify one thing. Though since our founding my position in t$ gov has been in IA, as of a few months ago I made a lateral move over to FA. We have a triumvirate system (our 'Executive Board'). So I am the Head of FA I've always tended to stay away from the OWF, and prefer to do my work on discord. Partisan is just my measly underling who sometimes runs amok on the OWF. Ask Ebeezy. It is hard to teach an old dog a new trick. I'm glad you like our post formats though; I like them too!
  4. Flame of the Flawed

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    Oh shit, good idea. I'll come up with some ways it could theoretically happen, and then fling some theses at them.
  5. Flame of the Flawed

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    As I mentioned in the other thread, I think we’ve reached the time where everyone is just restating their points. I'm sure we could go back and forth with this endlessly, but it would just be a waste of all of our time as we repeat ourselves. I will say though that to call it illegal there has to be reference to a law, and not what certain people think is ethically right or wrong. To my understanding, their charter stated that all members of gov are there at the Titan’s will, and the Titan can add or remove anyone. So, is it right? That is a real question each member should consider. Though Is it illegal? That is a different question. When some members of the prior gov that have been ousted and now oppose the current gov from within TCW have stated clearly that they don’t believe it to be a coup, I think it is easy to come to the conclusion that there are at minimum quite a few ‘gray areas’ on the matter. Now I'm envisioning a tornado hitting a sewage plant and creating a literal shit storm.
  6. Flame of the Flawed

    The Vanguard

    Inb4 Cynic sues for copyright infringement I hope you all enjoy this new endeavor!
  7. Flame of the Flawed

    Pantheon is back in the game :D

    We don't like the negativity of the tone this has taken on. We simply support the members understanding both views and being able to make a decision themselves. At this point, I'd say any relevant points have been made, and further negative back and forths don't benefit either party. We've now reached the point, that the OWF knows all too well, where it just becomes a series of circular arguments, with nothing new being repeated, but simply the same material coming up again and again in a cyclical manner. It seems best to me for both sides to now take this out of the public realm, and to allow each member of Pantheon, who now has both views easily accessible, to make their decision and move on. For what it has become right now, it is just becoming a liability for both parties, but I'm sure that is why many love these threads so much. I support both govs letting each member decide, and then building on what they then end up with.
  8. Flame of the Flawed

    Pantheon is back in the game :D

    I think those who've read the t$ statements know that isn't true, but I'm more interested in the next part. t$ has insulted TGH? Are you trying to bring the Parti-Buor NAP argument into this thread as well? ARE YOU MAD?! Haha, I don't think the readers would appreciate that. One major back and forth in the other thread seems to me to be enough.
  9. Flame of the Flawed

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    Kinky. I like. Keep going. Yep, I know we disagree. My humor sucks, you should know that by now. Sadly, the above response to Arkiri isn't humor. I'm quite aroused right now.
  10. Flame of the Flawed

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    Suspicious? Questionable? Controversial? Agreed. Seems we are in the same place now
  11. Flame of the Flawed

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    But your definition proves my point. It says, 'and illegal'. It wasn't black and white 'illegal'. Is removing a bunch of old gov questionable? Absolutely. But illegality is a different matter.
  12. Flame of the Flawed

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    Kastor has always been opportunistic. This is an opportunity to get two top 5 alliances who aren't on their side to fight and no one will *really* care because the FA backlash is mostly going to go towards Fist/Pantheon or Felkey/TCW. It’s a smart move, but anyone can see what’s going on. <3 Kastor
  13. Flame of the Flawed

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    I certainly have no intent of arguing either side's point of view in this thread. But I think if you do read both sides, it isn't a black and white issue. I think your point relies on it being black and white. It looks like fist just shared his side on another post (with CRUELLY difficult to read logs, my eyes are hurting... why would you do this to me???). And ya, I can definitely understand some of the old gov not being pleased, and not thinking it was handled well. But was it blatantly a coup? That is a different question. Some who are quite opposed to the new gov have personally told me they don't consider it a coup, even though they don't like how it went down. And I think they voted with their feet.
  14. Flame of the Flawed

    Live from Baghdad-Shifty News Network Reporting in

    Man, we've had so many entertaining threads as of recent. Good stuff, Orbis, I'm proud of you (I love watching Buo and Parti tear into eachother. I'm sick, I know. ). But to clarify some points... t$ simply wants each player to be in the alliance they want. If a player wants to be in TCW, then they can do so. If they want to be in Pantheon, they can likewise do so. Pantheon requested provisional protection for a time to ensure no one took advantage of them while this period of internal instability occurred, and we granted them that, as we protect others. During this time, each member should decide what they want, and act accordingly. t$ isn't picking sides, unless one of those sides is simply ensuring each member of Panth can make their decision knowing that they have some protection from direct military attacks in the meantime as they decide. If a significant group of Pantheon members wish to remain in their current alliance, they should be allowed to. As for the current gov situation, it certainly is a grey area, as someone who has heard both sides. I'm not here to make an argument for either side, but it isn't a black and white issue. I've also been in contact with Felkey a fair bit and he knows and understands our stance. I'm also confident I will continue to be in contact with all the relevant parties. Keep up the good show, Orbis!
  15. True, though it is specified to be based on Mount Olympus specifically
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.