Jump to content

Darzy

Members
  • Content Count

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Darzy

  1. Yes, but there's a reason it's called a suicide attack. In fact, losing infra in all cities is likely a benefit with the strategy.
  2. Darzy

    We are here for the Whales

    Oh god, I think I should sleep too holy shit...
  3. Darzy

    We are here for the Whales

    I meant, why the sarcasm? This thread is already a dumpster fire
  4. Darzy

    We are here for the Whales

    Why the /s :?
  5. Darzy

    We are here for the Whales

    Where is this quoted from 0_0
  6. Yo, not sure how y'all are gonna react to this but I am this guy, https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=109464 and I got granted one city by nova riata, I don't believe it is fair to say I 'profited the most' but feel free to take that city plus one more away if you want, I didn't have any reduced because nova granted me the money to buy it before the resource injection.
  7. Darzy

    Elephants: A Knight in Space

    Legitimately got clickbaited by this thread by this profile picture >_>
  8. I see your point I guess, have fun doing what you do then.
  9. I'm responding on behalf of someone else.
  10. Really? I thought you said you spent a lot of time on this game on your alliance? What would you to if it were to all be gone? Is your negative attitude, pride and ego, worth more than all the hard work I'm sure you've put into this game?
  11. Darzy

    Our not so secret war

    HAHAHA that's pretty fricking good
  12. I can handle it just fine, I don't expect you to lie, I didn't expect you to say 'pantheon is doing really well!' However, I'm trying to say that it would be most beneficial for the survival of the community to adopt the attitude that if you don't have anything nice to say, especially on the OWF, then why say it? Of course, you have free will to do what you want but I intend to keep the best interests of this game at heart and hope you do too.
  13. Darzy

    Our not so secret war

    True, nova wanted TF to have some fun too though
  14. It's not about being positive about pantheon, it's about keeping the community alive by keeping a positive attitude with respect to any alliance, even if they may be in a sad state of affairs like pantheon is. 'Why does anyone care about you again?' isn't a great way to keep this community alive, a positive attitude makes this game more fun instead of constantly telling people they are garbage which seems to be all you do on the forums. Hence, positive attitude, as usual.
  15. Darzy

    Selling Bauxite

    Hey all, selling some bauxite in bulk at 3875 PPU, just so ya know https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=109464
  16. Darzy

    Politics and... War?

    Hello, to anyone who may read this. This game seems to be called, 'politics and war' to describe how the game should be played, using politics, and war to continue that politics I guess. However, not everyone really plays the game this way, for example, until recently many people outside of certain fighting alliances have sat and simply grown their nation. That being said, many of these people have been criticised for this playstyle, with the critics citing the name of the game as 'politics and war' not 'politics and peace' or some other form. However, with an economic approach to the game clearly being allowed or even it could be said, encouraged, one would think that, 'Politics, Economics and War' would be a more apt description of this game if one were truly desiring to briefly summarise the game in a few words. If the game were truly about politics and war, it would be much more military focused I believe, with say, 6 barracks 6 factories 7 hangars and 4 drydocks cap for example, so that people could demonstrate their true dedication of their resources into military might. Instead, there exists a 5/5/5/3 setup which every nation takes into war, backed by their AA bank, showing a more economic approach to conserving resources and managing stockpiles that allow every player, not just the military madmen, to be putting their entire nation's effort into war. Now, net damage is generally a good way of separating the two types of people, however, my point is, if the game really were 50% war as the name suggests, then I don't think it is a problem with the people who choose not to war, but the lack of factors in game that make it 50% war instead of 33% as suggested above. My point basically is, many like to blame people for not all loving 'politics and war.' However, if there exists as many un-warlike playstyles as war-like playstyles, those other playstyles should be given a voice too instead of being rejected due to the name of the game being too simplistic. I do understand this is much, much less catchy. (P,E&W?) However, I'd just like to understand and hear others' thoughts on why the economic side of the game was not featured in the title.
  17. Darzy

    Typhon Run By Tyrant

    Find me a better one, or else it will be best thread 21st century...
  18. Darzy

    Terminus Est, Re-Declaration of War

    Brilliant
  19. Darzy

    Typhon Run By Tyrant

    Very interesting. I'd never heard of that before.
  20. Darzy

    Time to Play Hardball

    I am so confused.
  21. Darzy

    Declaration of war on Nova Riata

    Holy fricking shit, what is that
  22. Darzy

    Typhon Run By Tyrant

    How do you delete a city?
  23. Darzy

    Global War Peace Terms - Discussion

    While playing it cool is usually the better option, I'm not sure that they're truly wrong in wanting to wrap things up. Perma-global-war seems unhealthy for this game, at least from my perspective. Many will quit, as someone said a while ago about 'vacillators' or something, ordinary players who make up the masses in this game. Now I get it, many people think that that's good, it would leave only quality players behind, willing to fight to a bitter end, or no end at all even. However, the game wouldn't grow, it would just be the same old people if we were in permawar between the same people, no change of scenery and no dynamic interplay between allies and enemies. For example, say peace comes about at this moment. Everyone knows what the dynamic will be then, a $yndisphere vs IQ power struggle, sides of similar strength. While I can't predict the result, the ensuing conflict will at least be INTERESTING. All I can say is, as a non-participant in this war, the longer it goes on, the less I am interested in the politics of this game, not saying that I reflect the views of everyone, but I am saying that peace for a short while may be better for the game than a 3/4/5 month war.
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.