Mitsuru

Why do you quote me to tell me anything about Arrgh? Was I talking about Arrgh? If you want Arrgh added, ping Frawley.

They entered the war though despite this. Not with many wars but I think they can be considered big enough to add them.

@Frawley I think Animation Domination hasn't been added yet unless I somehow didn't see them.

We're living in confusing times. :d

When nobody tells you who your actual allies and enemies are.

Inst has plenty of experience with me telling him to stfu by now.

I just logged in on the forum with my slow ass cellphone to tell you to shut your mouth for a change. You literally know jackshit and then you post it on the forum for what purpose? Not only did we rebuild all of our nations post-Knightfall, we also rebuilt all of our whales to 2300 infra which we usually don't do. So not only are you wrong, you also chose to spill this crap about the one war where we rebuilt even more than we usually do. Probably 95% of TKR was fully rebuilt within a week. I'm not even going to waste my time on this Nova implication.

I see no reason why "a few cities" should be deleted since all of his cities prior to number 19 (Edit: as far as I remember) were gained while he was in TKR and profiting from our loan programs that are based on our own bank funds. If people agree that a ban is too far and that he should just be punished in the form of removing what he gained through pooball, then that is city 19 and the NRF. Another edit: I'm sure it won't make much of a difference @Alex but I have spent money on this game before as well and will cease to do so from now on.

As you can see when reading my post, I have perfectly pointed out how mistakes can have consequences. Sephiroth. Grumpy Old Bastards. Knightfall. Also I'm not entirely sure what kind of bot you're referring to but what does Shifty trying to stirr up beef matter? Sorry for the double post. (Nvm. Apparently double posts get combined automatically. How convenient). I mean that is a perfectly valid opinion as far as I'm concerned. And if a majority of players would support abolishing the looting of alliance banks all together, then I wouldn't protest until my dying breath because it would be such an outrageous change. I just don't personally like it.

Well the thing is that the intention of you and the original poster is different. Shify wants to abolish alliance banks so that people can raid alliance banks and get nice loot. You want to abolish alliance banks because you don't like the cluster of tiny alliances. I have not much of a problem with the cluster and would oppose eliminating alliance bank looting entirely just for the sake of reducing the number of alliances. I think offshore banks in total are not as much of a problem when it comes to the huge amount of alliances in comparison to many dead alliances that basically make up almost every alliance from #150 to (currently) #240 in the alliance ranking. If reducing the number of alliances is an important matter for you, then I would suggest you implement something into the game that leads to the deletion of alliances below a certain alliance score and below a certain amount of members after a certain amount of time if all the members are inactive. Edit: One of the reasons I oppose abolishing alliance bank loot entirely is because the occasional slip does happen. Grumpy Old Bastards during Knightfall would be a good example for that.

To add to what basically most people have already said here, I'll go to a bit of an extreme here. Recalling Knightfall where five major alliances (and a few smaller ones) fought over 30 other alliances. If offshore banks weren't available and you were forced to keep all your belongings in your bank, then the banks of those five major alliances on the losing side would've been looted into oblivion. Naturally that would've ended the war sooner than it did end but at the same time it would create a situation in which these alliances would have been basically unable to rebuild themselves and their resources for future wars would been depleted. These alliances probably would've been out of the game - in the sense of being able to go to war again - for months. And being weakened they could've become an easy target for new declarations. Taking offshore banks out of the game could potentially do so much damage to alliances in wars that they basically either can't recover from it at all or it takes them an unreasonable length of time.

Hasn't your war with Oblivion and Arrgh technically not ended yet? Well I guess CoA's have but Alpha's not.

With raiders coming in from various alliances (knowing that they won't face consequences anymore) that is rather unlikely. So far I've seen UPN, Frontier Records, Arrgh, Empyrea, Camelot, Knights Templar and Resplendent.

he said while declaring war on Pantheon himself

Finally this exhausting war is over.

Imagine posting this and thinking you have a hot take.

Then maybe be a good sports about it yourself instead of having the meltdown some people were expecting to come from them. ?

"other" is an interesting word considering that it means there are already any in Soup. I probably shouldn't even be making the attempt to explain what has been mentioned before but the day Illen joined TKR 16 days ago, he told me that he would leave again after a short time to go look at other alliances. So please just enjoy the war and don't let your soup get too salty by making this about your dislike for TKR, bb. ❤️

Have fun, Soup. o7 ❤️

It's a rare sight to see Orbis so united about something. It's about rejecting a ridiculous idea but still.. united. Beautiful moment.

Congrats~ ^^

A P&W comic by Ripper? This bloc was already worth it.

And did a grand total of one war. Truly astonishing ?

I agree. Especially because there's already a "Largest Nation by Land Area" award ingame which is currently held by Rose/Endiness from Church of Spaceology. So makes sense to have a leaderboard together with it.