Cypher

Honestly I’d advocate for the tank/plane change to be made post war. There’s no telling how it’ll upset the balance of the war, so we’re better off keeping the status quo for now. As for the extra project slot, sure there’s a likelihood of people using it for an extra military project but the majority of warring nations are sitting on sub 1.2k infra per city. It won’t effect the larger city nations at all. There’s little harm in pushing out that idea for the neutrals in this war.

There isn’t another group of alliances in the game that I’d go to hell and back for.

@Alex I’ll give you 20 credits if you return Keno to us!

Since what BK has done is already out there, how did you guys find out about their shady dealings with your members?

Good on you for coming out and saying all this.

I’d make either Zodiac or Cornerstone to keep the name forever but neither alliances were particularly good.

Should note tS had no decision making capabilities when PO was formed and how we acted. If anything, it was a HS venture spearheaded by myself and Revan.

I know I’m not the only one to notice the original -40mil net damage for tS attacking Guardian/Grumpy disappearing.

@Pop if it’s not too much trouble, I’d love to see the tiering of Chaos, KETOGG and tC individually.

Hi. We didn’t disagree with the information shared to us, we simply disagreed with the course of action they went with. NPO were told under what conditions we (HS) would have been fine with if they entered the war, albeit this was post declaration, whereas tS was firmly against expansion throughout.

Never had many interactions with you in HS, but your story’s very admirable. Farewell Hydra.

Honestly the lack of foresight from Coalition A is alarming. If they aren’t willing to take a loss to then bounce back stronger next war then joining their coalition next war is something I’d 100% be advocating against.

Look at my wars, I’ve switched sides now.

When did Roq start to get a sense of humour?

RnR were never going to enter the war. We specifically told them we wouldn’t be activating the treaty because a) it’s neither their nor their direct ally’s war. There really was no reason to drag them into the meat grinder apart from upper tier support when the majority of the fighting is happening in the mid tier. And b) a narrative being pushed around earlier was equalising or even gaining the upper hand in the net damage side of things. While I’m sure RnR doesn’t have enough infrastructure value to equalise, I’m not going to give Coalition B the satisfaction of using the net damage gap being much smaller to be used in any future arguments.

How about we pause the global war and teach these fake vampires who the real princess is?

Again, no one care.

No one cares.

It’s confusing to say the least. Basically Coalition B signed a sphere wide NAP with Fark... which included RnR who had no idea that this even happened. Just a reminder guys that communication is key between allies.

I, for one, welcome new war tactics.

Way too overused. How about the Ordinance of the Unjust Starks?

@Roquentin are we ready to announce our MADP or are you still writing up the treaty text?

Kiwi, would you like to sign a treaty with House Stark?

I won't be peacing the war out. While ambiguous, I did announce that I would be honouring HS' treaty with NPO. Now I'm sure you've been paying attention to what's been going on ingame but for those looking in, NPO are at war with TKR and I have full intentions of keeping true to all of HS' commitments to our allies, regardless of what coalition they're in.

Hold on Roq, I'm coming!