Moreau Posted July 11, 2015 Share Posted July 11, 2015 Maybe another edtion where there's no score ranges and total anarchy 5 Quote Signed by Sultan Moreau Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
General Peterson Posted July 11, 2015 Share Posted July 11, 2015 I'd play that 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saruman Posted July 11, 2015 Share Posted July 11, 2015 That'd be cool But we'd have to keep this one as well 1 Quote º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸ ¨°º¤ø„¸ GOD EMPEROR BIO DRANDO¨°º¤ø„¸ ¨°º¤ø„¸ BIO DRANDO GOD EMPEROR¨°º¤ø„¸ ¨°º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moreau Posted July 11, 2015 Author Share Posted July 11, 2015 That'd be coolBut we'd have to keep this one as wellWe will Quote Signed by Sultan Moreau Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Politics and War: War Edition, eh? >_> 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jefferson Davis III Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Title could be worked on, but I do love this idea, however, there wouldn't be any alliances otherwise the same situations would arise there as they have here, no one attacks because no one wants to be demolished by large alliances, at best, only loosely connected small bands could form. But I like it. Quote "Head-shots for days" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conroy Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 What I actually wanted is a war edition with the same setup as regularly P&W, but with cheaper prices for everything(to allow faster growth) and have it reset every year. This way we still put time and politics into it, so it's not just all war and we still have the benefit of not caring too much because it resets. 1 Quote LordRahl2, on 10 Jul 2015 - 5:53 PM, said: "Imagine it. Lets say that Sheepy had an idea that was at lest questionable. As a way out there idea lets say he thought about adding T-Rexs to the game in some way." "As you know this is hypothetical since Sheepy has never considered adding T-Rexs to the game." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexander Posted July 16, 2015 Share Posted July 16, 2015 I was hoping for a 'Politics and War: Speed Round' as I hear others that have been here longer talk about the 'speed round days'. I want to experience speed round Quote -- Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. -- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bilal the Great Posted July 16, 2015 Share Posted July 16, 2015 So basically, Speed Round PnW? Yeah this sounds pretty awesome. I absolutely support this. Quote King Bilal the Great Mediocre The Average monarch of Billonesia Wikia page (if you're into roleplay things). We Tvtropes now. (down the rabbit hole!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pfeiffer Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 Having more than one game going on at any given time is, in my experience, a community killer. 3 Quote ☾☆ Chairman Emeritus of Mensa HQ ☾☆ "It's not about the actual fish, themselves. Fish are not important in this context. It's about fish-ing, the act of fishing itself." -Jack O'Neill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooves Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 Having more than one game going on at any given time is, in my experience, a community killer. I actually do agree with this. As I honestly believe a majority of people will simply transition to the speed round due to how fast it is. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hawkeye Posted July 20, 2015 Share Posted July 20, 2015 It is wrong, if there are more then 1 game, more people will be intrested. Make a normal PW, a slow PW and a fast PW, more servers = more activity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiki Mod Dr Rush Posted July 21, 2015 Wiki Mod Share Posted July 21, 2015 It is wrong, if there are more then 1 game, more people will be intrested. Make a normal PW, a slow PW and a fast PW, more servers = more activity. I can say with out a doubt this false. You do not increase activity by making the community smaller. 1 Quote 23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves 23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous 23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed 23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves 23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love 6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be !@#$ing stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alice Lune Posted July 21, 2015 Share Posted July 21, 2015 War edition should remove the alliance concept. If players want to form their own guild outside the game, then that's their problem, but don't make it easy for players to gang up on certain other players in the game through the use of alliance feature. Income should also be increased either by percentage or multiples to make a faster paced gameplay. Additionally, development limit and colour stock should be removed too. As others have stated, allow players to play on two servers instead of either or. Allow possibility of permadeath. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pfeiffer Posted July 22, 2015 Share Posted July 22, 2015 This entire thread is bad. By implementing multiple versions of the game, you create a situation where people will invariably prefer one to the other, and stop playing the latter. This will make both communities smaller, leading to further player flight, and so the cycle continues. There are game models where multiple servers works, but a game that is so heavily dependent upon the player community self organizing (generally off site) is not one of those models. Quote ☾☆ Chairman Emeritus of Mensa HQ ☾☆ "It's not about the actual fish, themselves. Fish are not important in this context. It's about fish-ing, the act of fishing itself." -Jack O'Neill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ekejen Luish Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 It is wrong, if there are more then 1 game, more people will be intrested. Make a normal PW, a slow PW and a fast PW, more servers = more activity. How the heck do you make a slow PW?? Also, you spelled interested wrong. Quote This is very small Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hawkeye Posted July 23, 2015 Share Posted July 23, 2015 How the heck do you make a slow PW?? Also, you spelled interested wrong. we make 4 hour turns. very slow PNW could be thing as well with 12 hour turns. daily PW with 24 hour turns and maybe hardcore PW with 120 hour turns. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.