Namukara

Christ that's late for anyone in Europe.

Ewwwwww sounds lame. It'll never manage to succeed. Everyone there is big farmer also.

Yeah, what it's doing is just forgetting that you've clicked on notifications. For example, when I clicked on it yesterday I had 8, which I think was correct. A few minutes ago I had 13 (I had 5.)

That makes sense, to a point. Not everything is urban planning/propaganda bureau levels of useful. This however is only a slight step up from being moon landing useful. I get through a ridiculous amount of tanks in wars. My war strategy is awful and has not improved from 'ground and pound, and the tank losses don't matter.' If I warred more I'd likely be the target audience for this project. I have well over the 65m available to buy it, as well as more than enough project slots post rebuild. However, although I buy projects semi-regularly, I only buy projects that have at least a reasonable ROI; given that I don't know if I'll be playing this game in 6 years however I don't see a purpose in buying it. For the vast majority of players, it will cost them far more to purchase this project than they will ever see as a return out of it. It is therefore a near-useless project that will only be bought by a few whales with money to throw around, and thus I do not see the point in its existence in its current form.

I see you out there, threatening good things. Projects are meant to be a trade off in early game, you can't have all of them so you pick the ones which benefit your nation the most. That's the point of them. It's why they're both expensive and limited. I didn't buy AUP because I couldn't afford it at the time; I'm still yet to build space program even though I need spy sat because I can't afford it. 'Straining project slots' is a nonsense, it's the same as 'straining nation bank balances' as a reason to make war damages temporary. People have a limited number of slots and should be expected to choose the projects that are important to them, which evens itself out as, shockingly enough, everybody with a similar city count who doesn't build stupid levels of infra is in the same position. We can argue about what projects should achieve all day, but I'd hope that one thing we can agree they should be is useful. This one isn't.

I'm not sure how it can be described as a slot fill though? I always understood the meaning of slot filling to be declaring wars you have no intention to fight, in order to protect an ally from further attacks, either to give them an advantage in their current wars or to allow them to rebuild. Declaring on people who are clearly not your allies in order to bait beige is not slot filling, at least not in the sense that it was always enforced before now. If that is slot filling, is the method that has often been used by losing sides in wars, i.e. declaring on nations in alliances which have nothing to do with the war, also slot filling? If not then this new interpretation of the rules is a moot point: people baiting beige can just declare on, say, tcw and just sit there waiting for it.

You're only half-right here. Some Col A members were doing that, however GoG were also doing it at the start of the great leak war, to protect the upper tiers of both Acadia and UPN; Fark, Horsemen and WTF were beating the shit out of them at that point.

Since it is 'terrorise civilians,' a compremise with the improvement destruction idea could be that it only destroys what could be considered cevilian improvements. I'm thinking commerce improvements, hospitals, subways; the places that would actually be attacked by terrorists. It makes little sense that a nation is terrorising civilians by attacking a drydock.

Out of curiosity, if a nation in either of these spheres...forgets to demil, I'm free to help ensure treaty compliance right? I wouldn't be countered for helping get rid of their now illegal tanks and soldiers, and in fact should be compensated for my efforts? I'm just trying to see if I'm reading this right.

You made your bed with SOL and FSO, the honourable thing to do would have been to lie in it until the conclusion (you and UU both.) Idk what the deal was with AC, whether it was agreed they'd peace out after round 1 but them also if that wasn't the case. Just...don't be sanctuary. Being sanctuary is bad. Nobody likes people who are sanctuary, probably not even sanctuary.

Oh I know, I reminded him last week. Now I'm doing it again.

Hello, Last month I heard a proposal from some guy called Alex about reducing city score from 100 to 75. I really like this idea and I think we should do it, so I wanted to put it to the top of the page again so whoever makes the decisions sees it.

Alex, just a heads up, the war's over now. You can do the city score changes now. Also, my 10 credit subscription was $40. If I wanted a 20 credit subscription why would that be $90? Surely $80 makes sense?

Kind of surprised to see OWR and ASM up there rather than one of the big players in the lower tier. DP would be higher than ASM in my book honestly, though perhaps ASM is boosted by being in the sphere they're in?

You called?

Or like...just get rid of it. If you're on here you're supposed to be 13 anyway, and the 13 year old who hasn't heard a few bad words in their life is one very sheltered kid.

I quite like them ngl. HoF has two active econ people, but I know how much of a pain it can be if your econ guy is inactive (or rubbish.) Bots make managing your holdings a whole lot easier rather than having to wait 12 hours for your econ guy to perhaps give you some of your own money. Oh...and kt has used bots. I used bots in kt before, on our server. I think you were in kt at the time.

Thanks muchly

Anyone not mind giving me a rundown of what's in these logs? I'm blind, screen reading software can't read screenshots unfortunately.

Dear Johnsons; One of your allies has been attacked. It's just that you didn't seem to notice and I think you might be interested to know. Maybe you could counter or something, idk.

Just to add here, if the stuff about TFP adding people to the sphere without consulting the rest of it is actually true then there's a chance it could blow up with alliances who people are far less likely to laugh at than Camelot. Not consulting allies is a pretty dangerous FA road to go down. So yeah...don't do that.

Seriously people? This has been up on the forums for six hours, posted by Camelot and nobody has said it yet? Fine I guess I'll do it. Disband

Grave with the truth bombs.

You're not really who the post was in aid of. I know that HS is a major alliance which more than likely has a large part to play in sphere policy. My post was more aimed at the numerous smaller alliances that blackwater has seemingly adopted of late.

Don't! I talk to people in pnw every day it's horrible.