Prefontaine

I suggest you go back to playing Fallout and never post a suggestion again. But hey, I'm just in the Christmas spirit.

Kurdanaks only enemy is the power rankings.

Used it before, but it applies to the current discussions. For more, venture onward while not at work. MmMMmMmmmeeerRRrRryyyy Christmas! Ho Ho Ho

I went crazy, drunk pirates came along.

Huh. Don't see anything about either side attacking their allies.

Civ-V-tastic.

You've all been naughty.

Ho Ho indeed! o/ Arrgh!

Ho Ho Ho. o/

I completely agree. Who's advocating donators receiving special treatment?

https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/10166-trump-ads/?p=182499. I didn't even bother reading the rest of your post. I'll just go off the bases the rest of your replies were as inept as the first. Thanks for trying though. Because you don't have a counter to my points. That's fine, I understand.

Any ads could cause that. By that logic it could welcome new players as well who support him. Since they support trump they're obviously rich as well and will give him all the monies. (That last part is sarcasm) You can use ad-block, grow a sense of humor, or grow up. He's playing the game how he wants to play it, and he's doing so within the rules. Who are you to tell him how he has to play the game? You know how to beat a troll? Ignore them. Just like the ads. Creating a thread about it is possibly the worst solution. Sheepy's already instituted a rule change. It's already gonna change. Again, it's easy to avoid the ads, block them. Ignore them. I personally hate Trump and the ads don't bother me one bit. Probably because of the fact that I'm a rational adult and know that the ads generated by players do not reflect the views of the game, or game admin. But hey, it's a hard thing to understand for the little people. I'm not upset. I'm happy. I wouldn't be posting if this wasn't bringing me enjoyment.

Do you think more people would donate for a credit valued at 1.5 mil or 2.5 mil? I'm not asking about what Mensa does, though from my previous conversations with Pfeiffer the alliance donations have drastically dropped off, and when you first came in donating hard I don't think credits existed then it was just straight donation, though I could be wrong on that timetable. Regardless, the simple point is that if a credit has a higher value it's going to attract more people to want it. If more people want it, more people are likely to donate to get it (see: Not just Mensa). If more people are likely to donate for it, Sheepy is more likely to get donations. This is why I call you stupid, for not grasping that concept. But by all means claim I've not made an argument or point anywhere and that it's just mean calling your stupid. You'd certainly prove yourself to be stupid then! Oooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh I get it now. You're simply not reading. Or at least you're reading and substituting your own words in to what I'm writing and not actually reading what I'm writing. It's like you're making fanfics of my posts. Adorable. Where did I say it would have a significant effect on donations? I never said it would cause a significant impact on the donations received, making them more valuable might get him a couple extra donations though and PBG effects the value of credits single handedly by consuming approximately 25 of them a month through market purchases for ads. I do believe the only ones I've mentioned were war and the monetary value of a credit. But hey man, it's your fanfic about my posts. Rock on with yourself. You don't understand is because you are stupid. I explained the situation clearly about why you were wrong in the first place based on your lack of knowledge about PGB and thought he was actually advocating for Trump, and that you couldn't see the joke in it. PBG has a ton of credits and lots of in game cash, they don't care about growth and thus can just dump all their cash into credit purchases and lulzy adds. Thus the principal behind your whole wall of text was entirely wrong. You have no problem with people RPing something, but have a problem with "advocates the election of an external RL politician" stating that it's "is treacherous ground". Your core purpose is therefore wrong. The alliance is a joke. A joke you've missed, and taken as something serious, and even worse as something sinister that needs to be prevented. I gave you that info that your base judgement was wrong, then I called you an idiot for putting effort into that OP wall of text when you clearly didn't even speak to PBG about it to find out what was up and how mistaken you were. You took the bait like a champ, and continue to. I provide evidence to counter your statements, even though you call it "weak" and such, you still have to counter it because I've gotten those delicate panties in such a ruffle from simply calling you dumb while disagreeing with you that you can't wait to swallow more troll bait and have to reply to each my posts tonight. Thus perpetuating why I believe you to be dumb, you simply can't understand why I'm doing what I'm doing. Since this post has gotten out of hand because I honestly started writing it before reading your reply (Heh), lets sum up why you're wrong. 1. You never bothered to talk to PBG directly about this whole thing in advance to actually find out was up. 2. Then drew conclusions based on faulty information that you never sought out. 3. Are actually -for- the benefits created by PBGs ads in regards to an increased likelihood of Sheepy gaining money. 4. More demand for credits increases the value of credits, more ads means more demand for credits. PBG is the largest ad producer. Higher value more likelihood of people wanting a credit (see: point 3). 5. Sheepy has already made his ruling on this, before you made the thread even. Which actually makes me chuckle about your thread in principal. Oh yeah, and six. You're an idiot.

Probably Clarkes best post ever.

Ah, so you're not more likely to donate money when that money would get you more of the thing you want. Keep on conducting that stupid train. Also credit sales DO spike during a war. So lets use a very, very, very simple (see: even you can understand) example. When are people more likely to want to have a credit? Scenario 1: Lowest Price of a credit on the market is 1.5M Scenario 2: Lowest Price of a credit on the market is 2.5M The more credits that become used each week (PBG using lots for joke Trump ads) the less credits there are in circulation. The less credits there are in circulation the higher the price they go for because they're a less common commodity. The less Credits in circulation thus drives up the price, thus making credits more desirable to purchase with real money, thus raising the probability of Sheepy making money on adds. Thus you're in favor of Trump ads based on my previously quoted statement of yours. It's okay to be wrong. You've been proven wrong. Accept it and move on with your life. Unless you like entertaining me so... Then by all means continue digging that hole.

Trump is making money for the game by buying all those credits on the market, driving up the credit price, making them more desirable. Players have to buy credits for them to exist. Credits give Sheepy money. You're proving my earlier statements about you. Thus, since you're in favor of ads that make Sheepy money, you're in favor of Trump adds.

Also note that PBG is probably the largest purchaser of in game credits, they said around 25 or so a month through the market. That will lessen the demand and drive prices down thus making credits cheaper, thus making them less desirable to buy, thus making Sheepy less money. TL;DR Killing Trump costs Sheepy money. #IStandWithPBG

#IStandWithPBG

Okay then, dumb-dumb.

Spite, the entirety of your problem stems from the fact that you are uninformed. Princess Bubblegum has been playing this game longer than anyone in your alliance I believe. They've intentionally kept their nation small for reasons. They've been making trollish alliances before. I doubt PBG actually supports trump and is more making a joke at the candidate. That being said it's actually irrelevant if they are. If someone is as weak willed to be swayed by adds in politics and !@#$ing war into voting for them, then they should be voting for the donald. The fact that you're actual concerned about this enough to write the wall of text is actually laughable. Please be less idiotic in the future.

You should do a radio show.

TEst has more paper than anyone else. Syndicate is merely letting them into their panties willingly now. No Cosbying required.

Excuse me?

Clever is a bit of a stretch. It was about as blunt as it could be.