Avakael

We should have known. ?

And he was doing so well with his run down of events on the previous page, too.

So you're, what, 30 captchas deep for the day?

Dude next time just DM me

Someone finally had the balls to suggest it. Bravo, Pre. I prefer option 3 the most; but you'd need to adjust what air and ground control mean. Otherwise, ground simply becomes the dominant units, because ground control means cutting air in half and air can't attack back at all. You could also go with option 1 under normal circumstances, but should someone attain air, ground or naval control, they could then use that unit type to attack other unit types, with increasing damage dealt based on just how in control you actually are, based on the same existing mechanics for if you run air strikes on ground/naval units right now- the more jets they have, the more damage is still absorbed by those jets instead of the tanks you're targeting.

What if the NPO sent t$ in as a spy for Coalition B so they'd have a diplomat (Wilhelm) capable of negotiating an end to the war

Planetside Players: Gl with the AA anyway tho

In the end, it turned out that Opera needed an update. There were a few other issues with other sites that had randomly cropped up, and updating the browser fixed all of them.

The glitch is cropping up all the time for me with GAs. If I save up 12 MAP on 5 offensive wars and then run 20 GAs, it's almost odds on that at least 1 of those 20 will somehow not use MAP. I'm still mystified as to how/why it happens. I can only assume it's a problem with the PHP script that changes the MAP counter when attacks are run.

There were a couple days where I needed to ask t$ members to send me links to their attack pages for GA/AS/etc so I could directly replace war IDs with data I gathered about myself from the API in order to attack. There should really just be a 3x3 grid of buttons instead of 9 menu options.

It's 30% bed, 15% bath, 7% & and 48% beyond. Don't @ me.

When one side finally accepts an unconditional surrender with terms to come later, the other side needs to then issue no terms, and say, "See? We imposed no conditions on you after the surrender. You're a bunch of fricking idiots. See you in 4 months."

https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=525416 Attacks through 10/13/2019 12:07 pm through 12:08 pm, hadn't realised I'd made 5 attacks until I went through my 5 offensive wars and wondered why Eva-Beatrice had less resistance left over. Not sure which attack didn't use any MAP. All of about 100 infra destroyed and 0 cash stolen from the attacks, so no harm done- just wanted to flag that it's still a problem.

I turned off ads once people stopped putting up memes and propaganda. It's all recruitment now.

You have unsubscribed from Originals Announcements. You have subscribed to Unoriginals Announcements. Did you know that most jokes on the OWF are unoriginal?

Every micro should roll a d20 once a month, and coup their leader if they roll a 1. It's important not to have any unlucky people leading their alliance.

You know, when Nova Riata did this, they were fighting Pantheon. Not a KETOG member. Have fun, Rebekah.

@Nokia Rokia how did you like my post 4 times Wtf Alex even the forum karma system has a duplication bug in it, fix your damn game

They're finally here, everyone.

When I die, I hope they turn my ashes into a diamond ring, so Partisan can take me off for some fun one last time.

I'm still waiting to hear back from @Leopold von Habsburg.

Did we figure out if those t$ people were going to protect their protectorate yet

The answer, historically, is "never", and that's why this is such an interesting match-up. It's like a Dan Carlin "what if" podcast where Dan puts Alexander the Great's army in a battle 1500 years after their time.

Clearly I picked the wrong two Acadia members to try and bring down with me.