Flubb
-
Content Count
149 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
9 Followers
Recent Profile Visitors
1618 profile views
-
Charming Friends and The Light Federation MDoAP
Flubb replied to MRBOOTY's topic in Alliance Affairs
Partisan confirmed for loominati -
Selling info on The Dutch EI Company, Arrgh, Rose and VE?
Flubb replied to Marcus G's topic in Orbis Central
I bid 100k just for shits and giggles Otherwise, stupid thread is stupid -
o/ BK o/ TKR o/ InGen Also First!
-
I actually watched all of that. Just shoot me now
-
o/ BK
-
Can we all just admit that this is "stop liking what I don't like" and move on with our lives?
-
NEW HAMPSHIRE WOOOOOO
-
We at Papa John's Pizza Hut understand your concerns and thus have agreed to drop our catering contract with Reichswehr
- 176 replies
-
- 23
-
-
Because this doesn't make you sound like a sexual predator.....
- 59 replies
-
- 15
-
-
no....
-
I think the main difference (at least in my scenario) is that hackers would bring an element of preparation, not just by having hackers, but upgrading systems and shit so that you dont get !@#$ed over. Hackers could have the chance to !@#$ up your command and control as well which is different than just spies destroying shit.
-
But this is a game, and hollywood hacking is awesome see: hackers. There could be a project like a cyberwarfare command, that allows you to recruit hackers. Hackers could be killed by spy attacks. There would be upkeep costs. Hackers could perform defensive functions like setting up security systems that take x amount of turns depending on the number of hackers you have, and they could also perform offensive functions like launching attacks from another nation or detonating missiles in a country, or preventing missile launch and attack capablities. The success of these attacks can be offset by the number of hackers in a country as well as any security measures already set up.