Jump to content

Prefonteen

Members
  • Posts

    3694
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    99

Everything posted by Prefonteen

  1. Partisan Partisan Partisan It is almost as if I am being summoned. Say it in the mirror. Thrice.
  2. On point 2: It was not. Part of the issue at least during my time was exactly that mindset: Certain alliances wanted hostilities to end but refused to make any gestures of good faith whatsoever. What hands were extended were not always met. That's not on Syndi. That's on whomever decided not to give that a shot. It's not a decision one can blame them for, but it also makes it rather idiotic to expect syndi to suddenly pacify. It's how politics work. That also touches into the whole "NO ONE WANTS TO DO IT" narrative. Want to know my damn honest opinion? They don't, because you're doing it in a shitty way. Running up to alliances you have barely built a rapport with and suggesting they leave their allies in order to join you to make the game more fun for you (as they evidently feel quite comfortable) is *not* how you form a sphere. You can't make people join your sphere if the *only* compelling argument you can make is "to shake things up". Provide incentives that appeal to your audience. Consider their wants and needs. Cater to that. *That* is how you build a sphere. That is ultimately how syndisphere/OO was built brick by brick, and kept together. Not via a "omg we must win" approach- the winning came as a result of the cohesion provided by the accomodating approach taken by us. Similarly, building spheres takes time. Building the relations required before making a sphere? Even more time. You're trying to move too fast with too little leverage, and it backfires on you every. !@#$ing. time. Then, every time you complain and moan about it, you erode your own credibility and capital- capital which would be required for future endeavors. You're showing your hand. That transparancy will just become another obstacle to your success. But who am I to give advice?
  3. That's an argument which isn't really relevant to me so I'll kindly stay out of it .
  4. Being fair to pre: The guarantee given to test was that they would receive required assistance if countered. Hence my provision of the "an attack on test will be considered an attack on tS for the duration of this conflict". This was cross-checked with various allies to ensure that there would be willing counters in such a hypothetical. The rest... deductions made and/or information received during ensuing (coalition) discussions. I do believe panth was talked about too. Hazy on it tho.
  5. What happened to yolo lord strum dog?
  6. Hogwarts is not involved for as far as I know. I'd advise against raiding us unless you want angry wizards crashing your party.
  7. Nope. I will shred y'all !@#$
  8. you could probably throw in seeds for the newer alliances. Allows players who want to to release puppets/sat states?
  9. Showing the game the importance of adaptability via the introduction of insta-counters during proxy and various following wars. Shout out to ma boys. You da real mvp.
  10. I agree. Edited . Good luck with the war
  11. There's more. I've covered it already. Pleeeaaaase don't make me write walls on this *again* Thank seab for setting it right
  12. Hogwarts has received your request and consequently submits itself entirely to the whims of those loudest in its Discord channel.
  13. HEIL SNEK Would be... fitting.. to give TEst a beefed up arctic from which to launch their raids.
  14. I have a vague idea of what t$ will be portrayed as
  15. 1. Jessica. 2. Katie The angels of death and destruction are all I need. EDIT: 3. Chaunce as handler
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.