Captain_Vietnam Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 make on victory there is 25% chance you can capture city ground battle war better then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Fox Fire Posted November 27, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted November 27, 2015 How about stop posting? 12 Quote _________________________________________________________________ <Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line. --Foxburo Wiki-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Vietnam Posted November 27, 2015 Author Share Posted November 27, 2015 How about stop posting? have you make suggestions for game??? no dont make suggestions game needs more stuff or die soldiers attack city on victoary there 25% chance that they can capture city from enemy makes war more fun and raiding profitable Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Fox Fire Posted November 27, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted November 27, 2015 (edited) First off, you posted this in the wrong place. Second, this idea has been suggested and will get shot down faster than a Russian warplane over Syria. It's a completely terrible idea. Edited November 27, 2015 by Fox Fire 13 Quote _________________________________________________________________ <Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line. --Foxburo Wiki-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Vietnam Posted November 27, 2015 Author Share Posted November 27, 2015 First off, you posted this in the wrong place. Second, this idea has been suggested and will get shot down faster than a Russian warplane over Syria. It's a completely terrible idea. ok ask moderator to move topic then it not terrible idea 1 make new mechanic into game 2 raiding for fun 3 wars actual do damage Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsberger Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 (edited) First off, you posted this in the wrong place. Second, this idea has been suggested and will get shot down faster than a Russian warplane over Syria. It's a completely terrible idea. Technically faster than a Russian plane over Turkey that ended up in Syria Edited November 27, 2015 by donsberger 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 I like it. Also add an option that the aggressor can keep the occupied nation from posting on the OWFs while their nation is occupied. 3 Quote -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 ok ask moderator to move topic then it not terrible idea 1 make new mechanic into game 2 raiding for fun 3 wars actual do damage If this idea were implemented, Arrgh nations would have countless cities, taken from people like you. I alone, would be twice my size without having to spend a dime. 6 Quote _________________________________________________________________ <Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line. --Foxburo Wiki-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanek26 Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 I like it. Also add an option that the aggressor can keep the occupied nation from posting on the OWFs while their nation is occupied. TBH a good mechanic might be the victor in a war gets a 10% cut of the loser's income while they are in beige. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Vietnam Posted November 27, 2015 Author Share Posted November 27, 2015 If this idea were implemented, Arrgh nations would have countless cities, taken from people like you. I alone, would be twice my size without having to spend a dime. arrgh raid and it would suit game style arrgh would not lose all from war and knock down like they are so be stronger and help catch up with mega alliance like rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Fox Fire Posted November 27, 2015 Popular Post Share Posted November 27, 2015 And I thought Ibrahim was terrible..... 8 Quote _________________________________________________________________ <Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line. --Foxburo Wiki-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 TBH a good mechanic might be the victor in a war gets a 10% cut of the loser's income while they are in beige. Realistically, I have thought about suggesting something like that. Maybe 10 is too high? 5% of income and raw/manu goods produced? 1 Quote -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fox Fire Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 Realistically, I have thought about suggesting something like that. Maybe 10 is too high? 5% of income and raw/manu goods produced? What if our income is negative? Does the loser get payed from the victors funds? Quote _________________________________________________________________ <Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line. --Foxburo Wiki-- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Vietnam Posted November 27, 2015 Author Share Posted November 27, 2015 Realistically, I have thought about suggesting something like that. Maybe 10 is too high? 5% of income and raw/manu goods produced? it make sense if 30-50% of income income resources can quickly be brought an got. raid cost wont be cost effective otherwise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Jaehaerys Posted November 27, 2015 Moderators Share Posted November 27, 2015 Moved to Game Suggestions. Carry on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atzuya Posted November 27, 2015 Share Posted November 27, 2015 I fully support this suggestion Sure, I might lose a ton of cities at first, but once I get low enough I'd raid all those newbies endlessly and end up with 80+ cities all with stupid names and idiotic improvements build. Who can say no to a fun like that? Let us all throw away balance out of the damn window in the name of short-term fun, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Posted November 28, 2015 Share Posted November 28, 2015 Lol. Sell all my infra but my militaries and go troll people. no 250 ns pixel hugger will be able to stand up to my modest army of 108000 soldiers, 4000 tanks, 554 aircraft and 45 ships and 5 missiles. Those missiles will then go to the communist thing of vietnam or whatever his name is 2 Quote Proud Canadian, Proud Ontarian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dimitri Valko Posted November 28, 2015 Share Posted November 28, 2015 (edited) HAHAHAHAH. No. [EDIT:] Worst suggestion seen in a while. Losing cities this easily would give me, like, 50 cities by just farming inactives and raiders. Edited November 28, 2015 by Dimitri Valko 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnl023 Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 This would be enough to turn Vargen Institution into a raiding alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redael Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 peaceful economic focusing nation- spends a lot of time and effort to make a great city raiding nation- steals it without second thought Also how would this work, would you have helicopters pick up the city and fly it to your nation, I honsetly can't think of a way to move a city from one place to another Quote Gary Johnson 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Vietnam Posted November 29, 2015 Author Share Posted November 29, 2015 I fully support this suggestion Sure, I might lose a ton of cities at first, but once I get low enough I'd raid all those newbies endlessly and end up with 80+ cities all with stupid names and idiotic improvements build. Who can say no to a fun like that? Let us all throw away balance out of the damn window in the name of short-term fun, this not problem as raider alliance attack back you and get your cities from you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Comic Sans Posted November 29, 2015 Share Posted November 29, 2015 in the same vein of thought, what about peace treaties? could such a mechanic be feasible where both parties (or more; i don't know what diplomacy is) accept a flexible trade-off at the end of a war? Think of EU4, even though there are not all that many parallels to be made between that and P&W. then, small entities could be extorted into losing their cities! all's well that ends well. Quote o n t i s m you're gonna have a bad time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.