Ollysho Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 I feel like this could become a problem in the near ish future, Who wants to take care of it? [22:36:30] <&CMDR_Adama> I want to be spanked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxxikation Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 (edited) $10 says that at least one of those is Demon and the other 4 are multi's of Kennyong. Edit: Just found this Gem on the game reports forum: http://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/2923-just-to-let-you-know-sheepy/ Nip it in the bud indeed... Edited September 30, 2014 by Toxxikation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragojev Belojevic Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 Considering that I'm being attacked by Dzung personally, I'd support such an effort =P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caillou Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 TAC is already preparing someone to attack them. Actually, we have numerous nations ready to attack them. [17:17:58] <&Ashland> I will give you hops if you say this phrase: [17:18:13] <&Ashland> "Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard." [17:20:16] Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxxikation Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 Pubstomper, I wouldn't work too hard on it. Looks like the leader, and most of the members, are multis. There's a game report thread about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 (edited) So far, I have seen is their IP match doesn't match one another and no sending all the money to one nation. So still no concrete evidence is it is multi Edited September 30, 2014 by vincentsum8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxxikation Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 Aside from the fact that the guy has admitted to being a multi before, having more than 2 nations log in from the same network is not acceptable by ANY standards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dzung Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 Aside from the fact that the guy has admitted to being a multi before, having more than 2 nations log in from the same network is not acceptable by ANY standards. I don't know what I did to you, but in my game report thread ; I clearly explain that some nations in my alliance are my RL friends and we play in a crowded public area. (Same network) Check our trade activity, no large amounts of money are being sent, the UIDs do not match after around 3-6 GMT+1 and do you really think I'd try again after being found out? Jesus, this is exactly why I made that thread to inform sheepy and yet people still don't believe me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dzung Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 (edited) TAC is already preparing someone to attack them. Actually, we have numerous nations ready to attack them. lol, this alliance stuff really is srs business. I sure am scared of people that can't even attack me and even if they somehow can; I get 5 days of protection to rebuild. THE HORROR. Edited September 30, 2014 by Dzung Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adama Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 I don't know what I did to you, but in my game report thread ; I clearly explain that some nations in my alliance are my RL friends and we play in a crowded public area. (Same network) Check our trade activity, no large amounts of money are being sent, the UIDs do not match after around 3-6 GMT+1 and do you really think I'd try again after being found out? Jesus, this is exactly why I made that thread to inform sheepy and yet people still don't believe me. It's common for the community to typically not trust the things said by individuals who have no interest other than trolling and attacking everyone. If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a roll. There is one you will follow. One who is the shining star, and he will lead you to beautiful places in the search of his own vanity. And when there is no more vanity to be found, he will leave you in darkness, as a fading memory of his own creation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dzung Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 It's common for the community to typically not trust the things said by individuals who have no interest other than trolling and attacking everyone. I don't really care if people dislike me or my alliance, that's one thing ; but to try to get me banned or reset for something I didn't do (With clear evidence.) that's another thing and it's kinda bull. Maybe Sheepy should just ban all raiders, I mean they're clearly breaking the rules by making people cry. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filthy Fifths Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 Watch out for the fun police. 1 "In an honest service there is thin commons, low wages, and hard labor; in this, plenty and satiety, pleasure and ease, liberty and power; and who would not balance creditor on this side, when all the hazard that is run for it, at worst, is only a sour look or two at choking. No, a merry life and a short one, shall be my motto." - Bartholomew "Black Bart" Roberts Green Enforcement Agency will rise again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RagnarBuliwyf Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 lol, this alliance stuff really is srs business. I sure am scared of people that can't even attack me and even if they somehow can; I get 5 days of protection to rebuild. THE HORROR. Being locked into a perma state of war will inevitability make you bored and you will quit the game. Everyone does eventually. Keep pushing and you'll likely make some enemies that can and will pursue this route. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dzung Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 Being locked into a perma state of war will inevitability make you bored and you will quit the game. Everyone does eventually. Keep pushing and you'll likely make some enemies that can and will pursue this route. The same mistakes the earlier raiders made will not be repeated, namely the mistake of growing too fast and therefore actually getting attacked. Right now, all these threats seem pretty damn empty considering most on my members are beige and my score is likely too low for the fun police to anally probe me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odin Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 (edited) Being locked into a perma state of war will inevitability make you bored and you will quit the game. Everyone does eventually. Keep pushing and you'll likely make some enemies that can and will pursue this route. I think the most stupid one is the person to be prepared to fight them. Is that one a multi or some dude to be kept down at 40 warscore just to fight them? Thats what i call boring. It's a matter of fact, that those raiders just have one city. And every player in a decent alliance should be able in the 2 weeks of beige getting a second or even a third city and totally out of range to them. Edited September 30, 2014 by Wilhelm II Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filthy Fifths Posted September 30, 2014 Share Posted September 30, 2014 The same mistakes the earlier raiders made will not be repeated, namely the mistake of growing too fast and therefore actually getting attacked. Right now, all these threats seem pretty damn empty considering most on my members are beige and my score is likely too low for the fun police to anally probe me. The Fun Police is on the case! "In an honest service there is thin commons, low wages, and hard labor; in this, plenty and satiety, pleasure and ease, liberty and power; and who would not balance creditor on this side, when all the hazard that is run for it, at worst, is only a sour look or two at choking. No, a merry life and a short one, shall be my motto." - Bartholomew "Black Bart" Roberts Green Enforcement Agency will rise again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoS Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 The same mistakes the earlier raiders made will not be repeated, namely the mistake of growing too fast and therefore actually getting attacked. Right now, all these threats seem pretty damn empty considering most on my members are beige and my score is likely too low for the fun police to anally probe me. Raiders make the game fun by making war? And the "fun police" make the game un-fun by making war? You are brilliant to stay in a range where there will be no counter-attacks...and no loot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 (edited) Hopefully you don't plan to carry on the part of Red Guards/DEMON's legacy that included attacking my nations. Then again, I did have oodles lot of fun hitting DEMON and Broseph Stalin straight to beige last week without any retaliation on their part, so be my guest. â”(￣ー￣)┌ EDIT: You can add Kennyong to that list in a couple days, too. Almost missed him, thanks for reminding me! Edited October 1, 2014 by Kurdanak Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwynn Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 There is no Legacy in these people... please quit dishonoring Legacy. He's right, I'm such a stinker. Play my exceptional game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 Part of what made what Demon did effective was that alliances didn't have much in the way of resources, dropping 500 tanks at once to counter wasn't that easy of a feat. Now alliances have more money, funding a lower nation to fight back when declared on isn't a big deal. In terms of what these guys said about staying small, that's all well and good until you attack someone who puts up more of a fight than you can handle and the only way is to either lose, or grow and try to match production rates. Either way, hello new raiders. Don't touch Guardian, it's bad for your longevity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxxikation Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 I don't know what I did to you, but in my game report thread ; I clearly explain that some nations in my alliance are my RL friends and we play in a crowded public area. (Same network) Check our trade activity, no large amounts of money are being sent, the UIDs do not match after around 3-6 GMT+1 and do you really think I'd try again after being found out? Jesus, this is exactly why I made that thread to inform sheepy and yet people still don't believe me. Still breaking the rules. You're not allowed to form an alliance with anyone you share a network with. But that's a matter to be discussed in the game report thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caillou Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 The same mistakes the earlier raiders made will not be repeated, namely the mistake of growing too fast and therefore actually getting attacked. Right now, all these threats seem pretty damn empty considering most on my members are beige and my score is likely too low for the fun police to anally probe me. So uh.... https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=20160 [17:17:58] <&Ashland> I will give you hops if you say this phrase: [17:18:13] <&Ashland> "Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard." [17:20:16] Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dzung Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 So uh.... https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=20160 I don't really care, even if was 0 infra'd; 300 infra is no big deal to get back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caillou Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 (edited) I don't really care, even if was 0 infra'd; 300 infra is no big deal to get back. I dont think you understand; We are going to be able to permanently do this to you. For as long as you persist in raiding alliances you will always have to be ready to defend against The Atlas Confederacy. Edited October 1, 2014 by Pubstomper [17:17:58] <&Ashland> I will give you hops if you say this phrase: [17:18:13] <&Ashland> "Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard." [17:20:16] Man, I really wish Rose had allied BoC a couple months ago when we had the chance instead of picking Vanguard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luciuskonst Posted October 1, 2014 Share Posted October 1, 2014 They are one of the best alliances in P&W, they'll just keep coming in waves after waves until you give up. Be advised Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts