If the alternative would be either micros or large alliances I guess elite alliance would be better. Large alliances indeed are boring. The elite small high govs don't have the time nor interest to really engage with the lower 75% and wars are extremely well planned, followed by long NAPs.
Micros on the other hand seems to enjoy the best parts of the game, better cb's, relative quicker growth or decline, exiting wars with lasting impacts. Elite alliances could atleast in part better fit the micro playstyle than the large alliances.
But the benefits for large alliances are better than the other sides apparently and many people who play pnw for a long time feel comfortable having a minimum of input without loosing all the effort already made.
On another note, very nice to see the forums a bit more active!