John M Keynes

Submit your application online to this website: https://discord.com/

Currently there are 4 distinct spheres that signed a 3-month NAP extension without fighting a single conflict. This means that over 60% of the alliances are subject to the NAP extension with the other 40% under an NAP which ends next month or neutral alliances. With 3 seperate NAPs running concurrently, here are a few takes: Where did the definitive purpose of signing a non-agression pact shift from a tool to rebuild after long-lasting and costly wars to a political method utilized to circumvent wars and discourage game activity? Is this just a new rendition of the same NAP to discourage the hiring/auctioning of mercs/pirates to hit another coalition after notable instances? (e.g. Wheel of Misfortune, TGH) Does this recent foreign affairs move set a precedent on future NAPs to be signed in a similar manner? How will this affect the overall game activity in the next 2-4 months given these are often the months of highest game activity? Ty @Themonia for pointing this out.

20) Key🔑 (forum channels is a good idea, pnw server could use more activity)

All 3 of the following nations share the same unique id and logged on at similar times. Screenshots and links have been provided below: Nation Name: The Greater Germanic Empire, Leader Name: Stalin but German https://politicsandwar.com/nation/unique/id=606749 Nation Name: Taquavion, Leader Name: Sir Baloc https://politicsandwar.com/nation/unique/id=607192 Nation Name: El Shaboobie, Leader Name: Barrack Obamna https://politicsandwar.com/nation/unique/id=605555

Excellent @Kastor, looking forward to seeing a new radio show. 😎

Congrats on the merge and great theme, wish y'all good luck!

Prepare for your assimilation in 3, 2, 1.

Quite the long post, but I wish you all luck in your endeavors.

Excellent! Looking forward to working with all my new friends.

@Emperor MetalicraftHey man, it's just business.😎 @AgamerTWO rights make a right.

Dear OP, For your information, clicking this link https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/36594-2023-pw-academy-awards/ will take you to the page for the 2023 academy awards. Some information found on the linked page has been hidden under hidden contents panels, which will reveal more information about how the awards work and how votes are divided. For your convenience: The top 60 alliances with the highest scores that are not an offshore, training alliance, or a sister alliance will qualify for a vote. If a war is still occurring when qualifying alliances are selected, the top 60 qualifying alliances from both before the war and during it will be included for the sake of fairness, which means more than 60 alliances may initially qualify to vote. Alliances outside of the top 60 highest scores and want to participate should DM a member of the organizing committee on discord for more information. Alliances cannot nominate nor vote for themselves. Alliance representatives do not have to be the leader of an alliance but they do have to belong to the alliance they represent. They may be any member of the alliance that the alliance deems an adequate representative. This member may also not be on the Organising Committee for the Academy Awards. Alliance representatives are encouraged to consult with the remainder of their alliance's gov (and/or membership) when nominating and/or voting. Alliance representatives will receive their own channel on the Awards discord, in which a passcode will be shared. This passcode serves as a safeguard against the document leaking and will need to be included on their ballot in order for their nominations/votes to count.

Congrats Adrienne and Benfro on leadership and Canbec on his retirement!

Welcome! Glad to work with y'all! 💖