Jump to content

Chief Wiggum

Moderators
  • Posts

    247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Chief Wiggum

  1. I can already see us all becoming Rose officers!
  2. That's what I was told... ... but I am trusting you all, so I unlocked the thread, since there were quite a few members that wanted to continue the original discussion. In case you see new actions of flaming/derailing, etc. please let us know by reporting the corresponding posts or messaging me.
  3. Personally, I do not see "micros" as a problem, as long as the rules are followed. And, if you really want them to improve, you have to give them the means to integrate into the community. A "micro" post may give the chance to a new promising alliance to find a new protector/mentor that was going through the forum posts. Besides, being less "professional" is not a crime. If you think that a thread is spam or inappropriate or too generic (like a post saying "Hello guys! I am looking for friends") you can always report it and the moderator team will handle it.
  4. Hello SRD, thanks for your suggestion. Just to make sure we are all in the same page, naval attacks DO destroy improvements (unlike airstrikes) and actually have a higher probability of destroying an improvement than ground attacks. Three questions I have are: Why do you think this change is a good suggestion? Why shouldn't the same apply to ground then? What's so special about ships? Wouldn't that make missiles and nukes more useless? Missiles are the only unit that can target improvements instead of destroying random buildings
  5. Forum rule number I_don't_really_remember: (avoid) Topic Hijacking: Derailing a thread, or inducing topics that are not related to the original subject. I think that the thread is getting out of its original topic. No one is to be blamed, but please respect the intentions of the topic creator, especially in this case where a lot of work is needed to keep track of stats. Focus on the war stats and comments on them and the performance of alliances. CBs and politics/dynamics can be discussed elsewhere. This is certainly not a warning or demand. Just a kind request. Besides...
  6. Upgrading potato servers sounds quite exciting!
  7. That's stange... Working on that. Edit: I closed and reopened my eyes and everything seems fine now... Probably...
  8. Greetings Bandon. Welcome to the not so famous P&W forums!
  9. Relax guys. Take a deep breath. When it comes to defending your honor related to your nation sim management skills... Being polite and considerate towards new players though is highly appreciated. Before being too harsh and pointing out "mistakes", first study to whom you are talking. Regarding OoC discussions, etc. though, keep it civil at all times.
  10. Hello Radoje, Thanks for your suggestion. It's a quite interesting topic indeed. Leaving role-playing aside, are you trying to "fix" any issue appearing when we take in-game mechanics/politics under consideration? In my opinion, this new change would just make it more difficult for the players to wage war. I believe though that the opposite should happen. Most importantly though, knowing how Alex codes, if we go with your plan, I can already see all of the nations' cities having negative population.
  11. Good job, Zevfer. Keep it up! Make sure you find a normal pace and not burn yourself out.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.