Mitsuru

That aside, I actually always wondered why you choose the names you chose for your cities. I get that it's Japanese cities but usually people would start with the obvious choices like Tokyo, Osaka, etc. I'm seriously curious to know why you chose names like Kumamoto, Aomori, Ishikawa or Tochigi.

Does that mean those alliances spelled incorrectly in the OP are allowed to start new wars? Like "The United Empire of Zaharon" or "Principlality of Zeon"?

I was new at the time but I think I remember people being quite unhappy about a 3 months NAP after Trail of Tiers. So this is interesting I guess.

It wasn't even a couple of weeks. Which is why I agree.

Funnily enough I looked at this thread shortly after it was made. Back then, the third link actually had nothing on it (curiously now it does). So I made screenshots of link one and two.

Should've gone to Fark then during the war when you left New California Republic. You know, instead of going to Pantheon who's not been at war.

Hello. Upon looking at the list of current bounties I noticed that there is a bounty of $20,000,000 posted with no nation. My guess is that the targeted nation got deleted and that there's a bug that a bounty doesn't get removed from the page when the target disappears from the game. https://politicsandwar.com/world/bounties/

I think you can "renew" your VM and reduce it to 14 days doing that. Not 100% sure though.

If you think that our membership would support a treaty with BK for whatever reason, then I must really recommend you stop drinking bleach or whatever it is that is dazing your brain. You have not the slightest idea what you are talking about.

Oh yay TumultuousPapaya. <3 Happy rebuilding!

Eh.. somewhere (can't remember where atm) you alleged that people were "against" you because you call out bigotry and some shit. So there's that.

The maximum build is currently 5/5/5/3. You can not have more than three drydocks.

That's what I initially thought how he meant it. But I think what he means is that if you get beiged and win a war while you are in beige, then your beige time is decreased. I think the issue is players having friends from other AAs declare on them, get them down to 10~14 resistance and then to declare wars on other nations and get beiged 1-2 minutes after declaring. That way, they can't get countered anymore. Now say your beige time is now 6 days after doing such a thing and you win a war against one of the people you've declared on shortly before beiging, then your beige time gets decreased for every victory and you can get countered again. Unless that's not what Alex meant this in which case I haven't said anything.

I guess my favorite part about Apeman's and kenny's saltiness in this war is that for some reason, they have decided that attacking them must be the result of bigotry, racism, nazism, etc. You wonder how a sane person would come up with something like this. It's just because you're idiots. And people wanna punch an idiot. Eh.. I guess that wasn't a particularly nice thing to say but I'll make it nicer by saying it amused me. I like being amused. x)

Says the guy who's intro reads: "No Libturds allowed. Rollo Gigantistan is all about God & Guns. If you ain't down with that, we got 2 words for ya." Idk how that even aligns with being in the same alliance as kenny.

Correct. You only have the most exquisite members which is why two of them decided to delete within two seconds of a war. I guess your decision process on who you're accepting is not refined enough yet considering how poorly your members react to any kind of heat. I assume that in your endless intelligence and wit you fail to realize that people, even those with experience, are not interested in joining an alliance that is already overly aggressive on their alliance page. "Fark is not currently accepting members" probably scared off many potential members that you could've built up to become deared and beloved members of your alliance (That's how we plebs do it) if you wouldn't think that you have to let yourself down to accept noobs to your alliance. Even Nuclear Knights does that. Despite us outnumbering you, there was a way to go out of this showing that you are a good alliance with quality. Instead all of Orbis now thinks you're the last trash. But I know you absolutely don't care about this because you feel as if you're intellectually superior to every other person around you. x)

I guess micchan was irritated by the part where it says that you don't accept new members.

You forgot to put a circle around the "CRY BECAUSE YOU'RE OUTNUMBERED" thing.

If your enemy gives you the opportunity to build a nuclear arsenal during a war, then they're doing something wrong anyway. Outside of a war, however, you should have plenty of time because unprovoked spy attacks are usually considered acts of wars/aggression by all alliances. You could also just simply not have a huge nuclear arsenal because it obviously doesn't win wars so it should not be something you base a strategy on. That aside, there's still that one nuke that can not be spied away in any case.

Reducing the cost of nukes down to this would make them way too powerful as they would be too easy to acquire. Most of my cities have been nuked on ordinary wars and therefore 875 damage has been done to them. The rebuild for that (on Urbanization + CCE) will be ~11.4m for each of those. That is only a bit less than double the cost of a nuke at current market prices. Then I had two of my cities nuked on attrition wars reducing their infra from 2000 to 250. Rebuilding those would cost ~13.6m which is more than double the cost of a nuke currently. And it only gets more the more infra someone has. 2500 infra? ~21m rebuild at ordinary nuke; ~27.3m on attrition. So nukes are still worth what they do in damage. If your possibilities in a war have been reduced to just being able to use nukes or if that has been your strategy right from the start, then it's either tough luck or your own fault. My advice would be: Don't nuke low infra cities. x)

Oh I wouldn't say that. Micchan said something nice in her initial post (not the other one though). Johnny Costello said something nice. I guess kosmokenny said something half nice (I guess?). And IC also did. Samwise definitely put in the most effort into really writing something up though

Edit: Actually don't ;3

Apeman and kosmokenny are already meme enough I'd say. Nevertheless (not done by me but the person who did it doesn't post on the OWF):

Pretty sure that there will still be an official voting after the war.

Pretty sure the text is just incorrect. When we have a failed spy op on nukes, it also says "missiles". So I guess that was just a little mistake on Sheepy's side.