Odin

It takes, or it took? Last time, when i built projects, it reduced both on display. In reality (when you actualy click to buy it) only the money costs get reduced, not the ressource costs. See here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/5470-noocracy/?p=85509

6

Pumpkin Scissors... too bad the Manga translations are dead -.-'

I didn't post about that. Of course you can do that. I mean that i get those weird spaces if i use certain letters. Look how "Westpreussen" works, but "Ostpreußen" became "Ostpreuße n".

Minor bug: ^ There are actually no free spaces, you can recreate these yourself when typing (as in the example): "Mecklenburg-Pommern", "Ostpreußen" Btw, can you widen the character limit for city names? https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch

Well that was 1933-1945 around. Before americans seeked their luck in that region. I think Islam hit their peak now with ISIS and stuff.

And again, can you link me to a legit page, where you got this quote from? Hitler didn't talk very much english afaik. Would be "Um eine Nation zu erobern, entwaffne seine Bürger vorher." Now you can google for this quote in german.. nope, no results. Appearently that quote first appeared on Twitter in 2012 as support for US gun ownership. http://www.geschichtsforum.de/f66/hitlerzitat-51241/ Adolf Hitler "conquered" Germany in a democratic election. He conquered other nations with tanks and bombers, he hadn't cared much which pistols Ivan, Marek and Jacque had in their hands -.-' So, Hitler took 1938 the weapons from his citizens and killed 13 million of them? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_legislation_in_Germany#Gun_regulation_of_the_Third_Reich The first gun laws were enacted in ~1919. The allies demanded that the German Government gets completely disarmed. Now the Government had no weapons, but the citizens had... just think a second now of the USA in that condition Of course they had to enact a very harsh gun law, or anarchy would have been the rule. If you now have read the wikipedia article, you should see that the NSDAP even loosened this law, making it for many people even easier to get guns. And what's the 13m? Looks like the total killscore against russian soldiers only. Soldiers without weapons are either Frenchs or PoW's. They don't get killed normally. Let's not talk about WW2 here, russians had the GULAGs.The treatment was mutual. Civilists with weapons are partisans. They can be KoS, since they're not protected by/acting against international treaties https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hague_Conventions_of_1899_and_1907

Lol, like FF said, you're no Muslim, or at least you don't really understand your own religion. If you think of Communist as the best, then i'd like you to read here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxist%E2%80%93Leninist_atheism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism_and_religion Additionally, 'cause im so nice: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_views_of_Adolf_Hitler#Hitler.27s_views_on_Islam

Democrats Republicans Communists UKIP NF/FN ... ...

Instead he forgot his new "religion". UPN are followers of the Emperor of Mankind.

They reach us, so we're doing not enough Should make the road to Europe more dangerous then staying there. Problem solved.

The situation you're describing occurs in noteworthy alliances so seldom, that i doubt it's worth the effort scripting it. I mean, you could just leave the alliance with your 'rebells' and found an entirely new one, or name it "White Knights"

1. Yep, Submarines are nice See here: http://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?/topic/7069-new-units/#entry114393 2. Well, you have to decide if you nuke troops in cities (barracked reserve) or already fielded troops on the frontlines. So if you nuke a city, it shouldn't affect your current forces, but maybe your daily enlistment capacity. 3. Sounds good in combination with Nation Perks. I want Propaganda affecting my and my enemies troops morale. 4. I think that's already implemented. Only improval rating itself does nothing. You can have 0 approval and no harm done.

Can you elaborate? Except you're indoctrinized by true korean socialism, where 1 apple a day is more then you can wish for, i think there's more in life. The current food concept is rather boring though, still better then the mines concept. Since the starting 20 land can house all of your mines, and the next x-tousand land you buy are totally depleted of any ressources

Maybe. Depends on the time (+1 CET)

Since there's already this boring water idea, i just throw in again an old idea of mine: Consumer goods would be an interesting addition to our current ressources. They would be constantly wasted by the population like food. The higher the population, the higher the consumption of course. Producing "Consumer Goods" should need 1 unit of each steel, gasoline and aluminum. I don't talk about the output, number of production buildings now, In General, the production rate should slightly be over the consumption rate, and raised by a certain project, which could be tierable (for example "Governmental Economy Boost, raising Consumer Goods production rate by 10% or "+1", upgradable endless, but costs rise unproportional expensive). Additionally "Consumer Goods" should be lootable in wars at a relatively high percentage, and a part destroyed proportional to destroyed infra. Aircraft destroyed 5% Infra? -> 5% Consumer Goods get destroyed. Now the interesting part in this: Having a proportional high stock of "Consumer Goods" should increase your tax income (as some kind of sales tax). Even though in real you only store that stuff, a high stock could emulate a "Variety of commodities". The more goods you have, the more often you get sales tax from the buying population so to say. Consumption rate should be bound to the commerce income modifier. The more shops you have, the more consumption you have, but the more income you're generating. Maybe like: Consumption = [Global commerce modifier /10,000] * [total population]; for example: (1,15 / 10,000] * 4,45m = 511 CG /day | 0,15 /10,000 *4,45m = 66,75m CG/day ) Having 0 Consumer goods should reduce the tax income to 75% or less. Production rates as said above would be a thing for testing and mathematicians. I'd propose maybe 2-3 buildings which produce from 1steel/gas/alu ...like 5 units of CG. If you need more, you'd need to upgrade the mentioned project, wage war, or buy it from the market. Now the clue of it with the mentioned "variety of commodities". Having more then you consume per day should give you your full normal tax amount. Having a CG amount of more then your infra = tax income +3% Having at least twice your infra = +5% Having thrice your infra = +7% ... Rates can of course changed as the idea gets refined... or discarded like all of the stuff above. I'm just thinking of certain aspects, like to raise the value of steel/alu/gas outside of wars. Make wars more expensive for losers, and more yielding for winners (looting goods = taxbonus) It can be an alternative to lots of infra too. Raising your taxincome by having a large CG stock instead of having infra en masse. You can loot it contrary to enemies infra assets. Of course with changes to the things above it can be used for whatever you can think of to make wars or market trading more ineresting. Don't only critizise, instead keep posting reasonable changes, additions, own ideas. That's far more valuable then "No!"

I'd rather join the Dark Side-

Poland is a nice choice. Catholic, conservative, awesome economic growth, and fighting against SJW is supported by the Government. A dream Only their language sucks :X

Formate from mm/dd/yyyy to dd.mm.yyyy would be ok though, but not really necessary. What,s kinda necessary is a change in the cash format, as i currently get this unusable shit: $2,374.20 What i need is : 2.374,20$ . That way around. I have to change the whole stuff by hand as it is now, so Excel can use it. Only solution i can think of is a region change in the windows settings... Hell, no.

That's for your father to decide >.>

1. Lot's of things can be racist, and the more often people say something is racist, the more they support the split of humans towards colourshemes. 2. Of course. And not only against whites by other colours. But between whites. Ever heard of Untermenschen? 3. Yes, as It has the colours blue, white and red. Extremely offensive colours for Germans (Hint: France, Russia, USA, UK), and no, as it is a historical flag, not invented for some white power stuff. Don't just let every slightly offensed retard take away your old rights and sully your nation's history in the name of this social justice cancer! 4. Most time fun, most time true. They wouldn't exist if there weren't so many cases that people everywhere would accept them as a "typical" stereotype. 5. You can't ban racism as it is a way of thinking. Reminds me of an old german song (english lyrics) which was prominent during the 1848 uprisings, when free speech was banned by the monarchies. And gets often covered by bands, when free speech seems to get threatened new. Like during the socialist GDR times or nowadays, during the Merkel regime. If you revoke freedoms from the majority to protect a minority (which is maybe hated by the majorities like gypsies), you can be sure to get something between harsh discontent and revolts sooner or later Edit: Love the german steretype. Everything is true about them ;P

bump (including my -second post- addition)

^ Liberal in a nutshell.

Really? http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/604190/Denmark-closes-borders-Germany-refugees-migrants-motorway-Sweden http://healthland.time.com/2011/04/25/why-the-happiest-states-have-the-highest-suicide-rates/ Nothing against social security. But money doesn't grow on trees. It get's generated in form of taxes by the working people. That money, originally planned for social security, rents and healthcare, get's arbitrarily wasted into millions of useless sandpeople. And those guys have an insane reproduction rate. (Source https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_growth ) You really think the problem's gone if all of the Syrian people are in Europe? Only a small percentage actually comes from there. Keep dreaming. The US at least gets only Mexicans. Catholic guys with western(spanish) roots and latin language. Gz. What we get is what you (Bush/Obama) created. And don't come me with your social-liberal PC shit. That's what started this love&happiness bullshit to begin with. In Germany you instantly get fired from your job should you say things like Trump does, for being a Nazi. Everyone is frightened to death to be called a Nazi, that's why most people keep shut and lose interest in politics or/and stop thinking about such things. But the Revolution is there. Check your socialist France That's how it gonna end up everywhere in Europe till 2020. Not because of refugees. But because people see their chances of success to abolish the opinion dictatorship of the political-medial class. I at least will fight for it, if necessary... on the streets