Saru

You haven't bothered explaining yourself, but you have been bothering to outright lie -- yet again in our embassy. Atleast all of the members will see you for what you are. Even when a snake sheds its skin, it's still a snake. Enjoy the war.

The fact still remains that those complaining the most about intermixing the different worlds, are doing so by further intermixing the two worlds. How some cannot see that, I do not understand. I can't believe we're still talking about this and it has made 10 pages.

o/ Friendship Looking forward to working closer with you both

I may be way off, but this just strikes me as an NPO recruiting strategy, getting more of the (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways) guys to switch over to this game. As for the matter at hand, it is being way overblown. And it's funny to see people accusing others of intermixing the two worlds, by intermixing the two worlds.

Much ado about nothing.

You're cute.

The inquest over whether or not he was right to refuse you funds was concluded.

Not sure if I admire Alpha or think they are retarded. Perhaps it is somewhere in-between. How long is the war so far and what was the longest war before this?

Great to to see this.

I surrender.

Congrats to our allies in Rose, and the Vikings, who seem like a good bunch. You are in safe hands vE!

The advice that Ole and the others gave was good, perhaps join an established alliance first. If you do carry on with it, then best of luck!

Big fan of Shuriken! You have a bright future ahead of you. Glad to see this signed, and looking forward to working with VE if anyone causes you trouble.

Enjoy retirement Yoso. o/ LS

This thread needs more quality posts from Greatkitteh.

I'm not going to comment on whatever issue tS/Alpha seem to have. @Placentica: This is not the first time you have been hypocritical in regards to treaty chains. You attacked UPN without any treaty to do so -- yet you have an issue with someone going in on an oA/helping their own friends that they don't have an official tie to? For someone who is so bothered about the various technicalities, you surely don't apply them when it comes to your own actions. And I don't have an issue with you doing it. The issue is that you have an issue with others doing it, but clearly disregard your own 'values' as it pertains to you and your own alliance. That's something I have never understood about you, in all the time that I have known you.

I'll think about it

How Greatkitteh has not been suspended ever is beyond me.

Received. Thanks. !@#$, it's not letting me resend.

Good going Mort!

Thanks!

I would fully agree with that had we declared on Arrgh. Yet more proof how clueless you really are. Maybe you should talk to Ogaden himself for clarification to clear up your misconceptions. Damn, my comment is still surfacing everywhere.

Our government tends to be very fair. I suspect that in cases of accidents and people maliciously trying to hurt Arrgh, the government will make exceptions. The point is that the stipulation is there to try and get Arrgh to be more proactive in stopping the consistently regular raids by their actual members. And our goal was to clear ourselves of the nuisance, obviously if they raided our protectorates, we would have to make it our business again... and the bring the whole thing back up. My only concern of this was that we didn't extend it to BK too, but Arrgh haven't bothered them to such an extent before -- so here's hoping that doesn't happen lol.

I agree that it does not have anything to do with the topic itself, however given some criticising us have supported and seeked to justify heavier reps in the past, I think it's a fair point to make. (I don't recall the specific names of the individuals, so may be wrong as far as some are concerned.) And all I am asking for is to be at least somewhat consistent. If I ever see you demanding or trying to justify terms that are objectively more harsh, under similar circumstances, then yes I will call you out -- if I remember it. Thanks for your formal acknowledgement.

My attempt at spin has been foiled. Should remember not to bold the exaggerations next time. Haha, thanks for spotting it, I updated it. And from memory I thought it was 100k of each resource, but perhaps that is incorrect. What still stands though is I don't see how those justifying those reps in cases like that, are having the cheek to criticise our terms here -- which only request reps on raids made in the future.