Arthur Wellington

Dont mind a bit of offensive witty stuff but this is taking rping a bit far. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=160467 *deleted the actual message

Thanks!

just joined the Black Knights and so should you!

Hi folks, Just joined, building up my new nation, reading up on current events like the world war. Hope to see you guys around!

Goodbye Stetonic, you've been an amazing MoD for us!

Yay TheNG, onwards for DEIC!

The morals of the western countries, so very narrowly and ignorant brought down to the us, uk and france allow you Ibrahim to talk right the wrongs of daesh. Daesh would not allow the same. In this insanely limited thought that do not deserve the name discussion, that means 'the west' is morally more right. Your historical arguments are flawed, one cannot use history to compare current events, not as a negative nor as a positive argument. One can use history to explain current events. For example how daesh is a reaction to the downfall of the middleeast.

I dont agree with the statement. You are trying to compare two things that are not comparable. A statement could be muslim world versus islamic world or something. But both are way to diverse to use in any analytical thesis. I as a resident from a western country am not responsible for my governments acts. Nor is a normal resident from IS territory. Following this you could then try to compare IS to a (not all!) Western government. Still, to vague and too generic. Based on your posts in this topic you want statements on how western lives are more important then Muslim (middle eastern) lives. I would tell you: no! This is not an important question, its an open invitation to flaming and trolling. If you are concerned about this topic you should try to bridge the gap between cultures, try to raise awarness for muslim citizens or something like that. Lives in the Middle East wont improve with more estrangement..

Atheisme argues against religion because of the negative effects of the tendency of theists to say: because my religion/god says so. Its stops trains of thought and often provides a null argument. The benefits of religion are not dependend on a god but on human communities. That being said: without religion no star wars

The biggest impact isnt found in the mid tier alliances, its found with the top 3 alliance leaders. Also, tC might have lost but leaders there started it all. Many of these names have to do with being heard. Its a list like americana having pop culture people in their congress talking nonsense so to assure the voters they are being heard through their popculture role models.

I for one had some fun but the missles and nukes hurt bad! Im happy with the peace and wish all parties involved the best!

this war has been great fun up to now, everybody had their laughs and its nearly (?!) over.. I think DEIC has payed the price for not winning in a very bad way, millions of cash had been lost in this war, many people left DEIC, our score has gone down the most of any alliance on Orbis and we are standing alone now.. Whatever you think of stetonic or Clarke is all silly.. I think demanding the same reps froM DEIC as from UPN is a sign of not being a nice group of winners. To be honest, I have no clue as to what the reps should be but lets not act that DEIC is the Empire and our enemies are the valliant Rebels.. anyways, have funsies with this thread!

Vivke

same problem for me

if the damned treaty was so important cody, and we were so very very close, why have I not once seen you post anything on our forums? why have you not once talked on the forums (here or at our place) prior to the military build up, why have you not posted something when the wars started happening a few days ago? Your cultivating this, even making your sig. about it... omfg.. and fyi, I think im the only Dutch guy in DEIC.. ;-)

CAPSLOCK IS THE TRUTH! because it suited both parties back then perhaps? besides, its not like 78 nations declared war on SK.. quit being a baby, accept the pixel dust and move on ffs..

as a relative new member to DEIC this seems total BS to me. What happend back then has nothing to with this current war. Re-read the DoW and stop making the attacks on SK seem like our complete roll on them.. This is the first war DEIC is in for the last 2 months (since I joined), many other alliances have been waging war while DEIC has kept peace and kept out of bullshit for a long time. Now ofcourse its great fun to root for the underdog (smaller alliances) but its just that, rooting default for the underdog. Spinning small events into major game changes are complete cluster!@#$s by an entire alliance (77 other people ffs) is just politics been played out and an easy point to score. Wage the freakin war and let the outcome speak for itself.

It actually does. That makes it a weird treaty perhaps but there you have it...

why only open to certain people and who should these people be?

price?

Yeah, sure, He started to exodus from criminals and low lives from Europe to the Americas

I agree with OP In our time ISIS is a great threat to western values, all over Europe, America en Oceania people are afraid of terrorist. Banning this topic would be in line with modding that is already being done. Ibrahim, if you are not an extremist, what is the problem?

To me as a European the comments from Americans on the sword guy seem typical and awful. This might seem condesending but I think that not anyone deserves t die, no matter the crime, eventough at many times my emotions tell me someone deserves to die I, ad no-one, can make that assesment. Also the suggestion to use prisoners for science is not only sadastic my very disturbing.. My previous comment about violance being the hands of the government also shows a big difference between the New and Old world. I think that our governments should act as our protectors because any one individual cannot be trusted to decide when to use or not use force. The government is a representation of society and a should be corrected if they make mistakes, thats called elections. Each different institution, like the police or army, should have an oversight comitee checked by the goverment. This system has been proven to work. America seems to be stuck on the right to bare arms over the basic right to not be harmed.

Fact is that in countries that have outlawed guns the death-rate has dropped drasticly. I dont think each owner of a gun in America is a potential killer but even if a small percentage of the population will use guns in a wrong way (what always is the case, many peeps are nuts), do the benefits outway the downsides? To me, its not just a statistic problem, school in the USA should be safe places of learning. In the Netherlands, our middle schools dont have avoid-getting-shot training or protocols. I believe civilzation should move more and more towards a point where the monopoly on violence is in the hands of the government.

I still think this: There would be no reason for him/her to anwer. If it were to be yes he/she would confirm atleast parts of my statement above. Btw, I think this is internet optima forma, fun stuff people, fun stuff and btw, the word bomo's is censored, could that be changed?