Jacob Hanson

I can confirm this statement.

Sorry to see you go friend, You'll always be a pirate.

I'm not sure what to think about this announcement. I definitely dont like the style.

Thats all Im thinking about now. Sorry we arnt like oblige.

o/ Its been a good fight admist interesting circumstances. You guys provided a good fight, against opponents that actually gave us a run for our money.

I would consider that jumping on the bandwagon; but they are pretty much the same.

I believe it was 6 or less at the point of the message. Which is even more silly given the fact that the minute I was ready to fight you guys you poo'd your pants and had every IRC capable member querying me.

More War! AAARRGGGHHH! But for the record Grealind, This is not how you offer peace:

You should just join arrgh. You'd fit in here.

Guardian/Seven Kingdoms/ Mensa Dow'd on arrgh. Ogaden posted recognizing hostilities because he likes to post.

If only you had done any of that this war.

All of this was most definitely worth the effort. My Hat is off.

Because hitting Roz Wei is just a convenient band wagon.

You guys do remember you still have an open war front with arrgh right? Like, You changed your name n all, but now you're going neutral?

That is implemented via nukes and Missiles. If it is your goal to cripple a nation in the long run you should missile it. Instead others choose to use airstrikes and navals, but hey efficient damage is good damage in my book.

You realize you guys actively keep your infra level under the status quo to exploit the same benefits we are currently using? Mensa actively down declares 2-4 cities every war they fight. Dont get so high and mighty. Im fighting nations with 10 cities at 12, Under those means its the same as you guys declaring on litteraly anyone else. Except I have caps set by population so by far, Arrgh nations fighting are stronger, more organized and communicate better. Perhaps that stems from our positive community; rather then the hate fest that mensa is <3

I think thats why we laughed at him in private, right?

Dont encourage him

I think I struck a nerve ehh? Mensa Co reffering to your coalition, Sorry we have been refering to you guys as Mensa and Co. SK approached me and offered White peace after round 1, when our round 2 started hurting. They where negotiating on the entire behalf of your coalition because Mensa is to proud to ask for peace when they need it. Your egos are going to ruin you all one day. I offered them individual peace as an AA, at least they wouldnt take that. After another Envoy attempting to offer white peace from a different alliance approached me, I told him we would only accept an offer from pfieffer. The Very Next Day... My conversations with pfeiffer have never gone well, but Pfeiffer was nice, so we assumed it was his half keel way of getting us to ask for peace. (Even though this was not counted in my initial two, thanks for giving me the stage to talk about it). You are also sucesfully demonstrating that your allies, and your coalition is a non communicating cluster. Good work. Ya'll IQ's are way to high for this scurvy dog. I am. At home, Im not a huge fan of dumping publically but I will share relevent stuff in query.

Mensa Co has already asked for peace a few times.

Is this you saying that multis come up in your mind when you're planning game strategy? --- The tank and soldier limits leave me with a fraction of my entire build. I currently am maintaining about 58% of my soldiers, and 1/3 of my initial tanks. Meaning that your nations who hit me, Should have lost. Plane numbers are the only advantage I can maintain, As even beat down I would have less soldiers and tanks then most nations in my range. Under the "Negative improvements premise" my Military improvements are actually functioning at about 50-66% efficiency. Which should give your guys a chance to beat out any airforce. Ground Control was designed to allow you to turn the tide, and the current game mechanics allow for that. ------------- Also I would like to address the "Underdog" Bonus in Cyber Nations. This has been used to help add to balances of power and prevent people from being completely beat out. As it is a game and even if you are beat out and want to try you should be at least allowed to attempt to fight back. In Cyber Nations if your odds are below 25% another 25% is added into the calculation on a ground battle. This can help provide a losing nation with a very small advantage. I would correlate that principle to the fact that smaller nations do have the capabilities to maintain a larger ground force with less cities. They can use ground control as the advantage to win that. Mensa attempted this, but failed. ---- On the test server Avruch, MrBooty and I fought Metro with twice as many cities as us. And we won. There where no infra implications either. It is possible to beat a nation with more cities then you.

I thought you would be better with numbers There are 19 nations currently beat down. 4 of which meet your specifications of under 60 days.

Thats interesting, Im counting 15 owned by us, 4 who started in the last sixty days.

Dont worry we're coming for you.

o/ Pirate brothers n such. Cause Justice League is okay, but if anyone else goes to do something its just wrong.