Kastor Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 So is there anyway we can add tags to alliances to help people find them faster? Like "Democratic" "IRC active" "Paperless" etc. i can explain it further if you do not understand. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saruman Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Like Twitter Quote º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸ ¨°º¤ø„¸ GOD EMPEROR BIO DRANDO¨°º¤ø„¸ ¨°º¤ø„¸ BIO DRANDO GOD EMPEROR¨°º¤ø„¸ ¨°º¤ø„¤¤º°¨ ø„¸¸„¨ ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸¸„ø¤º°¨¨°º¤ø„¸ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaguar Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 #niceidea Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odin Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Like Twitter Like in Nationstates. Its a very good idea. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 I don't think I've actually seen this suggested before. I like the idea. \o/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pfeiffer Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 Focusing on search functions nobody will use is certainly a good use of development time. Quote ☾☆ Chairman Emeritus of Mensa HQ ☾☆ "It's not about the actual fish, themselves. Fish are not important in this context. It's about fish-ing, the act of fishing itself." -Jack O'Neill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted February 13, 2016 Share Posted February 13, 2016 Focusing on search functions nobody will use is certainly a good use of development time.I'm sure it could be used quite frequently, if implemented in a proper manner. Such as making the Alliance Recruitment page more useful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kastor Posted April 2, 2016 Author Share Posted April 2, 2016 Bump Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chapsie Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 On the backend it shouldn't be too hard either, just attach some search variables that users can create and search for. J'adore! Quote We have seized the means of production. Though union, and self-governance, we have organized between all peoples of the land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyper_Warrior Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 Definitely approve, would help massively Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diomedes Posted April 2, 2016 Share Posted April 2, 2016 I like this idea. Let's get on it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samdoo Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 What stops an alliance from claiming every category? even though they don't follow it It'd be cool if as a community we could turn colors into these tags, you can only choose 1 tag that way.. and colors would actually mean a bit more and help create a more clear political atmosphere. I'm fairly certain colors have became just become cosmetic, letting them become political would be nice. If you need to change colors you could.. and if a group holds "suspicious" elections on the election color, there could be inside color action and lots of exciting color politics, we just don't have right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chapsie Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 What stops an alliance from claiming every category? even though they don't follow it It'd be cool if as a community we could turn colors into these tags, you can only choose 1 tag that way.. and colors would actually mean a bit more and help create a more clear political atmosphere. I'm fairly certain colors have became just become cosmetic, letting them become political would be nice. If you need to change colors you could.. and if a group holds "suspicious" elections on the election color, there could be inside color action and lots of exciting color politics, we just don't have right now. Or maybe they could just have a limit of 2 or 3 tags? 1 Quote We have seized the means of production. Though union, and self-governance, we have organized between all peoples of the land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr McFraggle Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 This is a cool idea! Quote Forums: Aperture | In-Game Home: Join Today! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 i don't like it so it will probably be implemented reason why i don't like it is that it seems pretty superfluous. if you want your alliance to be noticed, buy an ad or do interesting shit. or, dare i say, recruit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yui Posted April 3, 2016 Share Posted April 3, 2016 (edited) I kind of think going through a sea of recruitment messages to see which one you like best is quite nice. The messages (or the ad) have at least had a bit more thought put into them. Just using tags doesn't seem that interesting. Edited April 3, 2016 by Yui Quote Dorky Weeb One Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fistofdoom Posted April 5, 2016 Share Posted April 5, 2016 (edited) Or maybe they could just have a limit of 2 or 3 tags? Yeah, up to three tags that the alliance officers/leader selects from a preset list, with suggestions for additions to the list in a public thread. It allows player input with a hard limit on any potential abuse. i.e. no 'nazi' tags for alliances, etc. Edited April 5, 2016 by fistofdoom Quote 01:05:55 <%fistofdoom> im out of wine 01:06:03 <%fistofdoom> i winsih i had port 01:06:39 <@JoshF{BoC}> fistofdoom: is the snowman drunk with you 01:07:32 <%fistofdoom> i knet i forgot somehnt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.