Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Nao last won the day on February 15 2015

Nao had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

422 Excellent

About Nao

  • Rank
    Grieving Captain

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Alliance Pip
  • Leader Name
  • Nation Name
  • Nation ID
  • Alliance Name
    The Golden Horde

Recent Profile Visitors

4432 profile views
  1. I'm all for fighting for the sake of fighting, but there's no reason to mask it with thin logic. Just makes it seem like a bad excuse when trying to take control of a war is the aim. If NPO came out and said what they were doing and fought honorably, sure they would get some flak for whole "consolidation" thing, but I think more people could get behind it.
  2. Hi Alex - I want to say that I think not enough will have been done if the current course remains. However, I have faith that you are trying to get more evidence to bring justice where it is needed. Regardless, I appreciate your dedication to responding directly to this issue and I hope we can all find an agreeable resolution to this.
  3. Nao

    Surf's Up

    give me those ankles boi
  4. Nao

    Surf's Up

    Not a bad point. IIRC, Blackfyre is already considered an SK extension in the statistics, so it makes a degree of sense. However, to Buorhann's point, they're simply not a coordinated combatant. As well, Arrgh currently has 2 active wars against TGH, 1 against Empyrea, and 1 against KT. Despite the fact that Arrgh is attacking Chaos to a greater degree, it still seems clear to me that these are opportunistic raids rather than any sort of front in the war.
  5. Nao

    Surf's Up

    Bow before me mere mortals
  6. Nao

    Surf's Up

    I think I deserve some recognition for locking down the 3 or less city tier. Praise me.
  7. inb4 it comes out that kastor leaked it
  8. Oh nice, I've done all I needed to do then
  9. And to think I had guessed we were just going to reform Mensa
  10. I think what you have stated indicates an understanding of (and subsequently the motivations behind) becoming the largest nation/alliance in the game. It is clear to me, and I'm sure many others, that the leaderboards, nation score, alliance score, and such representations of progress are benefited by an aversion to war. What you are getting flak for is not about whether or not it is wise to invoke large alliance wars, but rather whether or not it is fun and worthy of our collective time. What this post represents, at least to me, is a plea to make this game less about preservation and political stagnation and more about friendly, interactive competition. What I believe Pre is asking for is a change of heart regarding the culture and mindset of the game. Thus, I believe, it is impossible to try to determine what would be best for one's nation and simultaneously best for themselves. While it may seem the most obvious to find nation score paramount to personal enjoyment, I implore you to reconsider. I understand that you need to build a nation to play the game, and that sometimes the downtime isn't too exciting, but when I think back on my time spent in this game, I can barely recall my decisions in building my cities. I can barely recall how I came to max production or commerce. I can barely recall what I was thinking as I waited for the hour to change. I especially don't remember the nitpicky mechanics of the game, but what I can recall are the war times. I remember the lead up. I remember the declarations. I remember feeling strong emotions whenever I saw my enemy's stupid little icon. I remember trying to outfight in the game and outwit in the forums. OWF fights were petty, and sometimes they weren't so light-hearted, but goddamn were they fun. I remember staying up until 4 AM because @$%&ing Keegoz wanted to catch our enemy off-guard. I remember hating his guts for it, but respecting the play. Even more importantly I remember what I did in those times to help those around me. I remember how desperate I was to make a difference in a war; all the time forgetting that all that mattered was I had someone's back. Then, when tensions fell and everyone's nations were destroyed, I remember playing video games with those I called my enemy just hours previously. Stupid Pfeiffer and his pesky clan of Dio-lovers, but damn did he put up a fight in Rust. To me, that is what makes this game. What I am trying to ask of you, and anyone, is to find meaning in this game outside of the score of your nation. I think we may find ourselves having more fun than we realized we might.
  11. My takeaway and something I've felt since the EoS war on TAC - you don't need the strongest casus belli to start a war. There is nothing shameful in aggression, and it makes the game more competitive. An increase in fighting will serve to increase the value of your pixels far faster than waiting for your next city ever will. Hail to fighting.
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.