Caecus

o/

o/

Well, this thread isn't about a debate right? This is about tS terminating the contract. The reason why tS terminated the contract doesn't really matter at this point, it's not like tS or Alpha are going to pursue any treaties with each other anytime soon. Maybe the reason why Steve hasn't posted since page 4 is because your 8 pages of butthurt is really irrelevant right now.

LOL. The spy in the op if successful should just die with it at that point, lol.

o/ BoC o/ CU

/o VE /o Alpha

But further cap it by having the population limit the amount of military buildings. And remove the military building cap. Some guy a while back suggested to remove the limits of the military buildings, so you can build like 18 barracks, or 18 airforce bases in each city. I'm saying the same thing, except instead of still limiting how many military buildings to 18, base it off of a ratio between the population and said military buildings.

Meh, buff damages to other stuff besides nukes? I mean, there is potential for spy use outside of just killing nukes (and if you are sad and desperate, missiles too)

Or have militaries based on population size. For example, you can build X amount of barracks for every, oh, say, 10,000 citizens. That would neutralize the city advantage across the board. It would also mean infrastructure damage actually means something, and after you nuke someone, you actually do damage instead of just push them into the lower tier and !@#$ up your alliance mates there. In this case scenario, the point of even building cities is to gain more population at a lower cost than just overcrowding one of your cities.

Meh, more or less correct. Not to mention you get beiged, giving you a free hand. Nukes really aren't that great...

In other words.... FIX SPIES! QQ

o/ NPO

lol, same. My spy kill hasn't risen that much, tbh. I actually have higher death rates now. Almost every time I go in and spy someone with EC, I lose like 6 spies and 1.5m. Still miss the old days.... :/

A response to the contract termination?

Best of luck tS.

Meow.

Still doesn't change the fact that tS declared on Rose. Totally agree. Which is why we are doing this? Why does it seem so hard for you to understand that we are doing the same thing? Why should Alpha be expected to walk away from Rose?

Keep your fascist nose out of this, you nazi! -.-

First and foremost, you are making a lot of assumptions about me, one of them being that by being against Trump, I must support democrats. A logical conclusion, but a very incorrect one. Secondly, "The Rich" doesn't have the same ultra-nationalist overtone reminiscent of a certain far, right-winged party that emerged in Germany in the 1930s. I would argue that is a tone more suited for another mustached war criminal in Russia on the far left, but that's neither here nor there. Finally, like many who see the Republican primary, the 2016 presidential election seems more or less choosing between poisons. My personal regard of the matter is, at this moment, disgusted and saddened by the state of affairs and pay mental homage to the Framers for having the foresight to see idiocy in the whims of the average individual.

So, you are saying Trump would not agree with the following statements: "Jews Mexicans are ruining our economy." "Jews Mexicans are taking German American jobs." "Jews Mexicans should be deported." "Germany America was once great, but we lost our way, we got soft and liberal, and our economy was stabbed in the back by Jews Mexicans." Hitler didn't tell everyone he was going to kill the Jews. In fact, he didn't start the genocide party until 1941, almost 8 years after he took power. And even then, the German people weren't openly informed that he was doing some hardcore cooking. I'm not saying that Trump is going to end up like a genocidal megalomaniac who is going to go on world conquest, promote ethnic cleansing, and then while failing at all said objectives, die in a hole with a cyanide pill and a gunshot to the head. I'm saying that Trump focuses on the discrimination of minorities to gain popular support through xenophobia and the natural discontent generated in the aftermath of recent policy failures by promising better and more efficient government and deportation of said minorities. If Trump ran during the McCarthy era and that McCarthy era had a rapid and sudden market crash resulting in millions of unemployed, I would say that he could mirror the rise of Hitler very closely.

Wow, this is a big rhetorical middle finger to a rampaging Guardian/SK/Mensa sphere.

Meh, for the record, a lot of the surviving Jews are the ones who left Germany when Hitler became supreme chancellor. You could arguably say Trump's populist rise and condemnation of an ethnic minority in the midst of socio-economic stress and a deadlocked legislative branch mirrors Hitler's rise to power in post-Black Friday market collapse.

o/

and i second human souls. Let's add teardrops of virgins, and shots of Vodka. On a more serious note, we should add the silver standard

/o