Lord of Puns

ftfy

You guys were really the only ones with level heads left in the game. Maybe when the inevitable next nation builder goes up we'll fight again. Who will I spy on now?

Tl;dr read the title

This. This is it. This is the reason we rag on you.

Honestly having Lordaeron's IA up there was the only thing on this list that made sense. I mean there's gotta be some sort of reason people keep joining and staying in Kastor's alliance

Get any more suggestive of a flag and it'll be Ironporn

Why is he still allowed to post

The thing you take issue with is game strategy. The whole point is to make it difficult to build enough military to hit someone on your level with no military. That's the purpose of scores and why military impacts your score so much. Solution: you don't like fighting large city counts? Don't build up to them.

------- ------ He's doing it on purpose I just know it

After a long reflection and eating two nukes I've decided maybe we put this on the back burner for a while...

The Radiation Food Reducing Agent was one of the most balancing implementations Alex has ever added to the game. Food is now a much more precious resource in war, but could still use a little boost. My proposal is this: A World Salinity Index Feel as if OWF is too cancerous? well then don't go on it... Well then clearly the next step in action is to introduce a game balancing agent to ward off potential trolls and flame based content is to threaten their access to resources. Solution: we starve them out. (OWF Live Feed) It would act similarly to the radiation index except would source solely from the salt levels on the Open World Forum. I have included a demonstration as to how it would look: Naturally I understand something as complex as this would be difficult to code or even develop a formula for. How do you measure saltiness? And the answer to that my friends is something I found in complex calculus equations. The first step to converting a non mathmatical value into a such is by sorting it into units. I have discovered you can ascertain the basic unit of Saltiness through a series of chemical equations. To find the most basic root of the salt unit is you take the base worth of Kastor, the substance most closely related to salt in this environment. Then I take his value which is about 60,000 grams I assume and then multiply this to the number of moles in one gram of salt which is 0.0171107563861. The unit you end up with is 1.026x103 Kastor over moles of salt. Kastor over moles of salt is the unit I have described as OWF Salinity. Visualized here: Once you utilize this value, you then proceed to use it as a modifier to the number of salty posts over total number of posts on the forums. There you have it, that is the value used to decide the salinity value of orbis used in the food reduction values.

What you're doing here is assuming our withdraw from the war was made by us alone. There is absolutely no way that this withdraw would have occurred without the consensus of our allies already in the fight. All of you are grabbing at nothing. "Wow you guys pulled out, such bad allies". You actually have no idea what is going on dialogue wise between IQ members. All you have is a post that says: "We fought, and now we're leaving because prolonging this war doesn't suit our interests" What you're assuming is that our interests ARE SOLELY based on tTO, and not in consensus with the interests of our allies. If they were upset with our decision would they not make it clear? Fighting to the death may have honor, but death is not in our interests or our allies'.

When sheepy says he fixed the war system

That strategy would not work out at all. Unless the top tier sat on their asses all game and the blitz was a great success (first big problem here), the top tier can continue to rain fiery hell upon the mid-upper tier and continue to fund the alliance during wartime. When you leave the strongest part of the enemy alone and you weaken yourself by fighting against weaker nations, you're susceptible to not only a counter that was stronger than you to begin with, but a counter that has had time to build while you wage war on his lower allies and come in when you're at your weakest. Leaving the top tier alone almost never works unless they are so far out of reach they can't hit you.

Alex. Learn to make a survey that works. What you have given to us doesn't assess how players feel about the credit value or cost in anyway other than "which of the following is the least bad out of all of these terrible options". I know it's just a freaking survey and I shouldn't get too tilt over it, but this is what you use heavily to assess what to do with the current credit outcome, and I don't want to see you botch the credit system again because of a terrible survey design. Include comments next time.

So Zodiac goes in to defend their members... And gets countered I think your alliance is handling Zodiac better than your original blitz

+1

-delet-

At least BoC remembered who they were fighting

From what I gathered from my side of the war, the upper tier of IQ was vastly outnumbered by the upper tier of Syndisphere. If you look at Pantheon and t$ for example: and see how their upper tier handled, only very few of them entered into a defensive war despite being on the defense. It looks like mistakes from last war were made again, not properly managing strikes on the important targets but settling for easier picks which is where getting countered really screws you over. Nonetheless, while impossible to source via code, I would like to see what percentage of the blitz was successful according to victories. While I won the wars I fought I was out damaged because of consistent nuke strikes. Not arguing against the data, it clearly failed, but I would still like to see the outcome of the wars.

I think you have something going with an addition of requirements as to who attacks who and voidance thereof. But in reality politics change so swiftly treaties can't keep up with them. So while right now I might not want my allies to fight Joe Stupid, I sign the treaty and then he does something really stupid, I'm left hanging. Vice versa out of the blue another alliance comes up that I really like, treaty's already made and it can't be rewritten without an addendum later on, which just detracts from the whole get rid of paper idea. Annnnnd now you lost me. There is a reason we don't do this. Number one: geneva convention. Number two: ever played the game diplomacy?

o/ war!

The Third Crusade/King's Crusade The Third attempt by non-syndisphere to destroy syndisphere. (Hint, they lose)

Wow I never thought we'd hear from you again, we all miss ya man

Paper mill this week