Jump to content

Raiding Policy for The Union of Peaceful States


Dolphman
 Share

Recommended Posts

UPS RAIDING POLICY

 

 

The Union of Peaceful states has created this simple raiding policy to help clarify to all what we think of raiding and how we handle it.

We have a really simple answer for our members who wish to raid, No. As the name implies, the alliance is completely peaceful. Members can not raid at all. All Nations, even those hours away from deletion with no alliance are off-limits.

If you attack us, we will not respond to your attacks with military action. Instead, You will get one chance to pay back the damage in reparations. If the aggressor refuses and/or continues to attack, The Supreme Gentlemen will deal with them. How this goes about is up to the TSG. The TSG has continued to treat an attack on us as a attack on them. We neither can nor want to control what they wish to do with the aggressor. We are never the aggressors in any conflict, so suspect them to be tough on any nation that disrupts our peace.

We have had some nations claim the above is not fair, as we appear as a small weak alliance with no military power, yet we have one of the top ten alliances protecting us. I say it is the responsibility of the raider to do their research before invading. If you blindly declare war, you deserve the consequences of said war.


 

  • Upvote 2

2JTFBIP.gif

Leader of UPS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be clear, do you or do you not protect members of the UPS who are being raided via military action?

I was saying that we will not respond with any sort of counter-attack, we will never try to fight you back.

2JTFBIP.gif

Leader of UPS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was saying that we will not respond with any sort of counter-attack, we will never try to fight you back.

So you're fair game to raid? Nice to know. :)

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you're fair game to raid? Nice to know. :)

Is this a jest?

YkvbNCA.jpg

You're no longer protecting the II? We have still teamed with II and TAC (and others) to rival The Covenants. This is getting complex.

#FA_Problems

Big problems for TSG. Really, not kidding.

If Casey and Cyradis are King and Queen does that mean they're married?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe TSG is getting cheap resources in return? Who knows. That's really between the two parties. In the end this is basically an advisory: Mess with one, you fight the other. And that's all I need to know or care about.

q8nfyvc.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does TSG get out of protecting you guys? Why have them do the dirty work if you're not even willing to protect your own members?

 

I'm just a little curious as to how this all works.

Yeah... I can't say I respect an alliance that won't even defend it's own members.

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are defending their own members. They defend them by allying with the Supreme Gentlemen. Can't you read?

Which is not defending their own members.

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, so raid them. See what happens.

I don't raid. But regardless, alliances should protect their own members. That's why they exist.

I mean, neutrality is one thing, but this is just pathetic.

Edited by Fox Fire

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though TSG is indeed protecting you, I wouldn't put your eggs in one basket. There could come a day where TSG can't protect you and then it is basically open season on your nations but I'm sure your fully aware of that.

  • Upvote 1

[11:52 PM] Prefontaine: But Keegoz is actually bad. [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: He's my favorite bad leader though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't raid. But regardless, alliances should protect their own members. That's why they exist.

I mean, neutrality is one thing, but this is just pathetic.

Agreed, they can be totally neutral and not engage in entanglements, but they should also be willing to defend themselves. It does not break neutrality if you have to stand up for yourselves and keep the enemy at bay. It only breaks it when you favor one side over the other.

 php882dgiAM.jpg.9136a0a695ba680a032e6cfd5880ece4.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't raid. But regardless, alliances should protect their own members. That's why they exist.

I mean, neutrality is one thing, but this is just pathetic.

They're a pacifist alliance, didn't you know?

Democratic Republic of Koprivshtitsa (DRK; Bulgarian: Demokraticheska republika Koprivshtitsa)

Communist Party of Koprivshtitsa (CPK; Komunisticheska partiya na Koprivshtitsa (KPK))

Member-state of the Green Protection Agency

 

~Peace and Fraternity Between All Nations~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though TSG is indeed protecting you, I wouldn't put your eggs in one basket. There could come a day where TSG can't protect you and then it is basically open season on your nations but I'm sure your fully aware of that.

 

I do have plans for this, and I have some candidates that I can turn to if TSG disbands. Of course we could just hire protectors in the moment.

  • Upvote 1

2JTFBIP.gif

Leader of UPS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do have plans for this, and I have some candidates that I can turn to if TSG disbands. Of course we could just hire protectors in the moment.

OK, but seriously... Why exactly won't you defend yourselves? You mean to say that if I were to attack you, you wouldn't retaliate at all. Instead you would rely on TSG retaliation? I just don't understand why you wouldn't retaliate to at least defend yourself. Even GPA does that....

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, but seriously... Why exactly won't you defend yourselves? You mean to say that if I were to attack you, you wouldn't retaliate at all. Instead you would rely on TSG retaliation? I just don't understand why you wouldn't retaliate to at least defend yourself. Even GPA does that....

 

I have found much more easier to just ask for immediately reparations, or the TSG will take it from you. It has worked so far. Its also pretty fun watch the raiders whine about how it isnt fair.

  • Upvote 1

2JTFBIP.gif

Leader of UPS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They would defend themselves.... soldiers etc automatically engage in battle when attacked. I guess he means they won't counter-attack.

 

I for one think this alliance is absolutely great and a tribute to Orbis, so many are obsessed with war - even those who claim to be socialists :rolleyes:

Democratic Republic of Koprivshtitsa (DRK; Bulgarian: Demokraticheska republika Koprivshtitsa)

Communist Party of Koprivshtitsa (CPK; Komunisticheska partiya na Koprivshtitsa (KPK))

Member-state of the Green Protection Agency

 

~Peace and Fraternity Between All Nations~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They would defend themselves.... soldiers etc automatically engage in battle when attacked. I guess he means they won't counter-attack.

 

I for one think this alliance is absolutely great and a tribute to Orbis, so many are obsessed with war - even those who claim to be socialists :rolleyes:

Just because an alliance is socialist doesn't mean that they automatically must be neutrals, I can't seem to figure where you came up with that idea. I find it kind of amusing that a neutral who doesn't even understand war that well is accusing all of us of being warmongering menaces. If we were, you would've been rolled already. :rolleyes:

  • Upvote 2

"They say the secret to success is being at the right place at the right time. But since you never know when the right time is going to be, I figure the trick is to find the right place and just hang around!"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Kastor> He left and my !@#$ nation is !@#$ed up. And the Finance guy refuses to help. He just writes his !@#$ plays.

<Kastor> And laughs and shit.

<Kastor> And gives out !@#$ huge loans to Arthur James, that !@#$ bastard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.