Vincent Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 Just like you guys. I 'll like to reach to next tier too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 You've got a long way to go. Guardian and DEIC are both rather under-militarized. Its clear this wasn't escalating soon. Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Baraboo Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 Lol yes I'm 398 posts well 397 now from that 500 post count so I doubt I get to that next tier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwynn Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 It was more a matter of principle and follow through, simple as that. He's right, I'm such a stinker. Play my exceptional game! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Baraboo Posted November 17, 2014 Share Posted November 17, 2014 No I'm here for the cash. But I also like pointing out things. The bad thing is .....I think Diabolos is actually believing his spin. To bad not many others are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Smart move, Guardian. Glad things worked out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geronimo Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 No I'm here for the cash. But I also like pointing out things. The bad thing is .....I think Diabolos is actually believing his spin. To bad not many others are. Agreed. He did it to change the subject though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vincent Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 But anyhow I believe both alliance considers this matter closed now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Why would I care if I was liable or not for the embargo, the only reason I mention it is because our members were not ordered to do so, they had free will and could have chosen not to if they did not approve of the recommendation of which there would have being no negative feedback towards them because it was not an order for them to carry out. You have a bad example, but none the less it is still a choice and not an order. Why certainly! Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted November 18, 2014 Author Share Posted November 18, 2014 As the OP I'm going to request a moderator to lock this thread. The situation has been closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarke Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 No I'm here for the cash. But I also like pointing out things. The bad thing is .....I think Diabolos is actually believing his spin. To bad not many others are. Let's be fair I'm consistent, I didn't give an order to impose embargoes and I didn't give an order to remove the embargoes, hence embargoes still being in place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aisha Greyjoy Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 (edited) Stop evading. You told your members they "should" do something and they did. Then you said "stop it", and they did. That makes you an effective leader. No need to spin further. Leaders can lead without giving orders. The best ones do. Edited November 18, 2014 by Aisha Greyjoy Duke of House Greyjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clarke Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Yes but wording is incorrect as it was never an order if we're going by the definition, by comparison Guardian actually ordered an embargo. Another piece of incorrect wording would be in the OP where is says "but the most Kangaroo received were attempts from DEIC members to make money of the situation", the plural use of member is incorrect. I'm not trying to spin, it's just the thread has a lot of misused terms that need to be cleared up regarding the embargo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizban Posted November 18, 2014 Share Posted November 18, 2014 Locked per OP request. FORUM RULES - ALLIANCE FORUM RULES - MOD QUESTIONS - APPEALS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts