Jump to content

Teaspoon

Members
  • Posts

    168
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Teaspoon

  1. Good thing that never happened and that therefore the rest of your post is meaningless drivel, eh?
  2. Dude, the things you're pretending to be outraged about didn't even happen. If you're going to go on a faux moralistic crusade to try to get your browser game enemies banned and sent to prison at least get the facts right. A) Nobody has ever been forced to pay real life money for anything relating to this game. People who attempt to pay money to join our alliance get laughed at, ridiculed, generally banned from our channels, and most definitely are not allowed to join us. 2) The mercy board terms work as follows: We raid a lot of people. Occasionally, some of those people ask us to stop raiding them. In the case of most other alliances, those pleas would be ignored, but we in our great mercy do offer peace to these people on the condition that they join our Discord mercy board channel and complete one of several trials presented for them, from which they may choose one. Those would usually consist of either writing a short essay about a humorous topic such as the ethics of stealing fizzy lifting drinks, drawing a mspaint comic about, say, Arrgh being bad, or singing/rapping a song, or doing something silly on video like the DBZ fusion dance or, yes, eating something gross. There was never any pressure to choose the latter over any of the other options, and usually quite the opposite because quite a lot of us think mspaint comics are more entertaining than watching someone in a dumb mask eat fish flakes. And when they do something we find sufficiently funny, we often end up inviting them to join GOONS as well, because they are likely to jive well with our sense of humor. We've recruited a couple people this way already. Your repeated insistence that our alliance is somehow morally abhorrent for seeking humour in a game we play is, quite frankly, ludicrous, and it is transparently obvious that you don't actually care and are just playing to every possible angle to win one over on us for your own reasons. It's kinda sad, to be frank.
  3. Go forth, my friends, for it is time - time to enter a new era. A brave new world of shitposting is upon us! Praise be Alex! Long live the PnW Forums!
  4. I'm revving up the popcorn machines, this is gonna be a wild ride. Thanks Alex!
  5. Ah yes, "everyone". I'm sure the leadership of coalition B cares an awful lot about what... *checks notes*... FARK and a bunch of micros?... thinks of their decisions in a war which doesn't involve them. Top form, mate.
  6. I am not even remotely affiliated with leadership of my own alliance even, never mind the people who are setting terms for the war. The outcome of this war and the surrender doesn't particularly concern me. I'm just sick of the ridiculous amount of whining for no real purpose. If you're so convinced that coalition b isn't going to stop until you disband, what's the point of complaining about it?
  7. You're the one who has been claiming that coalition B leadership's goal is to force you to disband, which is an avenue to peace right there. If you don't have the leverage to force better terms, what exactly are you trying to accomplish by stirring up shit on the forums when you know that they could not possibly care less?
  8. The way wars have worked in the past could not possibly be less relevant. They do not matter in the slightest and have no bearing on how anyone else conducts war in the present or going forward. So what if NPO and BK have ulterior motives for presenting terms the way they did? There was still a path to peace on the table for coalition A which its leaders could have taken to spare their members from continued war. That they did not, and without anything resembling leverage with which to change those terms, is entirely on them and their damned pride. My question is what exactly is the point of all this? Dumping logs, making a dozen threads complaining about how their enemies are treating them - what is the goddamn point? What are they hoping to achieve? Nothing posted here is going to change the minds of coalition b leadership. Y'all are just making fools out of yourselves for the sake of your own pride. You lost. Acquiesce to the victor's surrender terms, disband, or die screaming.
  9. The losers do not get to set the terms of surrender, sorry
  10. It seems like the rest of col A was offered the chance to surrender and chose not to. That's on them, and their members suffer for it.
  11. So what are you going to do about it? Whine on the forums and change nothing while you continue to get rolled? At this point either the members of Col A alliances can leave those alliances, or their leaders can surrender, or the war can continue. I seriously doubt any amount of whining is going to get anything changed given how little Col B pays attention to the forums, and how little they'd care even if they did
  12. I'd certainly nominate him, but I'm not high enough up the totem pole.
  13. Log leaking has always been part and parcel of games like this, but doing an uncurated mass dump of all channels of a discord server is definitely unprecedented and beyond the pale. Even the most banal of offtopic discussions can cause problems for people if leaked to the wrong parties. This is also the reason why the TCM stuff wasn't distributed, fwiw.
  14. Making a spectacle of a mod ruling you dont like is definitely something that people who aren't mad do, yessirree.
  15. Making fake chat logs for a browser forum game isn't criminal impersonation, dummy. That said, I don't see any reason to believe these are fake.
  16. Comparing something that takes at most 90-120 minutes per day to something that was an outrageous soulcrushing grind that literally killed people seems... strained.
  17. Making up a whole bunch of shit about our alliance and then repeatedly insisting it's true without the slightest shred of evidence doesn't actually make any of it true, nor is it going to convince anyone who didn't already hate us to begin with. Really, this whole post is just sad. The only people competing against moderation efforts are you and yours, Scarfalot.
  18. I agree wholeheartedly that it takes up waaaaaaaay too much space on mobile. I actually like it a lot more for desktop browsers, though it could still use improvements, but on phones it just sucks.
  19. I wasnt referring to you specifically, I've seen baseball compared to cookie clicker a lot and my post was meant as a joke. Sorry for the confusion
  20. The main part of the argument was a bad faith attempt made to try to attack the enemies of the OP who he perceives as caring a lot about baseball, who subsequently quit the game in a huff after a failed attempt to get Alex to ban another group of his enemies for the mere crime of existing. It should be rejected as the laughable, childish tantrum that it is.
  21. The people who compare pnw baseball to cookie clicker have clearly never played cookie clicker past the first five minutes, because it rapidly becomes even more passive than PnW ?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.