Hughes

(Reposted here because I accidentally posted in Tech Support) It seems that Military Action Point deduction after doing attacks is broken. So, I had a war that I thought I was safe from being defeated in, here is the war card from 11:44 pm game time: 52 resistance is too much to take down in one series of attacks, even with 3 successful navals, costing 12 MAPs and doing 42 resistance. He only had 4 MAPs after daychange, but soon after daychange, I receive a notification saying that "Lawnistan has defeated you in war," and notifications that he had naval attacked me three times and did a ground for the beige. I checked war timeline to confirm. Sure enough, he only should have had 4 Military Action Points, but was able to do attacks that should have cost 15 MAPs within only a couple minutes and was able to defeat me. I know this was a problem earlier this year or last year, where players could spam naval attacks to do a ton of attacks and even defeat instantly at once without having the required MAPs, this looks pretty similar to that. Edit: this happened to someone else in the same war, looks like he was intentionally abusing the glitch

It seems that Military Action Point deduction after doing attacks is broken. So, I had a war that I thought I was safe from being defeated in, here is the war card from 11:44 pm game time: 52 resistance is too much to take down in one series of attacks, even with 3 successful navals, costing 12 MAPs and doing 42 resistance. He only had 4 MAPs after daychange, but soon after daychange, I receive a notification saying that "Lawnistan has defeated you in war," and notifications that he had naval attacked me three times and did a ground for the beige. I checked war timeline to confirm. Sure enough, he only should have had 4 Military Action Points, but was able to do attacks that should have cost 15 MAPs within only a couple minutes and was able to defeat me. I know this was a problem earlier this year or last year, where players could spam naval attacks to do a ton of attacks and even defeat instantly at once without having the required MAPs, this looks pretty similar to that.

Earlier today I tried to launch 3 airstrikes against an opponent and got three Utter Failures despite having around 400 more planes on the first airstrike. The first one was 1925 vs. about 1550 planes and each of our planes went down by a similar amount(75-100) with each airstrike. The chances of getting UF each of the times individually was about 2%, and the chance of getting it all three times is 0.008%. The opponent had ground control, and I was sure it must be a bug with GC still grounding planes. I had no MAPs so I asked someone else attacking the same guy to do airstrikes and screenshot the detailed battle report page. Here is the planes used in the battle: And here is the result: As you can see, according the army value, Magister's planes are being affected by GC, as he should have an army value of closer to 3k because plane value is planes*3, but actually only has an army value of 1,668. Here is the link to the opponent: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=16132 Here is my war against him: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=659252 And here is Magister's war against him: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=659251

8 days until what? our gov chat is very confused serious

This is better than just having the city score change without a military buy change, but only if the soldier buy remains 1/3 of total per day.

As Aether said, it is your own opinion that those changes are "good for the game."

Pretty much exactly what I was checking for, thanks.

Would you mind linking the specific war? Just wanna check it out.

You mean the older members that have invested the most time in this game? Also, seems fair that people who are more active should have more of a say.

This. If you join a decent alliance, you should have people willing to counter for you. Also, this nerfs raiders severely because not only will it be harder to find targets, but it will be harder to overcome or ignore counters. For example, right now, I am at 21 cities. I am currently being countered by a c10 and a c13. I can beat neither because they are at close to max soldiers/planes and I can't even double buy enough military to beat them both, or even one before my military is killed again.

It came from the bank...

I'll be waiting

aww man now i wish i had nukes to launch

don't worry. ur 18k tanks and 280 ships with only 80 planes is looking quite ripe for the taking. Its coming. Just keep taking care of those free stats for me

i logged in just to downvote this edit: inb4 gets downvoted by a salty godfather

stop

it seems to be like that for a lot of proposed changes ?

Yea if anyone's gonna try to bring in the "baseball has a meaningful community" side then you shouldn't be pushing against this you should be pushing to try to make baseball in itself more personal and individualized making it less of a spam thing and more of a personal thing would increase the community and probably the amount of people who would play it

How do I vote for all of them shoot i was late dang

Yes

please stop

im really confused because this doesnt have a tag is this a [DoW] or a [DoE]?

I'm not sure whats going on but I like it

well well well Is it even a surprise that a BK downvotes this Carthago man smart

huh that was quick best of luck