Jump to content

Cooper_

Members
  • Posts

    412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Cooper_

  1. 3 hours ago, Sir Scarfalot said:

    is learn how to wage war properly

    Or... even pixel-hug properly.  Look at those wasted production bonuses.  7/7/5 mines instead of maxing out at 10 for the +50% sighs.

    Imagine not even just not fighting back, but failing at that as well.  

    1042792776_ScreenShot2020-08-24at3_03_56AM.thumb.png.28087afb532c66890671d45dd2bc799f.png

     

    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
  2. On 8/16/2020 at 9:31 PM, Insert Name Here said:

    Getting rolled isn't so bad, I was in the shit tier during that entire war while IQ used and then double crossed any alliance they could. Y'all should either have booted Under and distance yourselves before it was too late or simply support him till the end.

    Honestly, this.  I mean in its past 3 wars, TKR eventually got rolled all three times.  We're stronger because of it.  Mostly everyone here has made mistakes, and–to some degree or another–mostly everyone has paid for them in some way.  A large part of accepting responsibility for actions is also accepting the consequences.  If you do get rolled and you bounce back even stronger, you'll earn respect and have new paths open up to your FA.  And I'm unaware of anyone who would subject you to what we were subjected to last war.  A few weeks and a decent bit of pixels destroyed.  
    This is also why I think the original post rings so hollow.  I understand that y'all claim the timing is simply unfortunate, but, given your history and position, y'all don't really deserve the benefit of the doubt.  I'm not sure what you expected Orbis to think besides that this is a naked move to protect your hides, the SAME sort of behavior that got UPN in trouble in the first place.  Pixel-hugging is antithetical to what I'd want to achieve if I were in your shoes.  

    Now to be clear, this isn't an open endorsement to roll UPN, but I thought the context was important enough to add.  The first steps towards taking responsibility are quitting with the pansy "shoulda-coulda-woulda" excuses, starting to acknowledge what you did wrong, and showing the rest of Orbis how you plan to fix it.  You didn't accomplish any of that here.  And maybe that gets you rolled, but you'll come out the other end with your community intact and a whole potential future to explore.  

    I mean it wasn't that long ago that most of the world had issues with TKR and decided to hit us in KF.  I like to think that we've learned a lot since, and I know we're in a much better spot from an FA perspective despite having made missteps.  There are many other alliances that have similar stories.  It is up to you guys to make it happen and turn over a new leaf.  Until that point, you can damn expect that you'll be subjected to intense scrutiny.  Fix it and be better.  Maybe then we can talk.

    That's about the extent of the good faith I have to offer you guys.

    7 hours ago, Nokia Rokia said:

    @Benfro @Mitsuru as 2 people ive never met nor spoken to i care not for what you have to say about me and as for Citrusk and Cooper they may be your friends however that means you should easily be aware of the public image they hold 
    when 60% of the game thinks your toxic your probs toxic and most people dont call me toxic they call me idiotic or eccentric or shady not toxic 

    I was going to ignore this as I don't really care what you have to say about me.  My reputation speaks for itself.  I don't have the time of day to worry about someone getting salty about having his one-man AA denied protection.  But insulting a leader of one of my protectorates goes too far.  Having worked with him for months, I can say that all of us in TKR are proud to have Citrus and Oceania as a protectorate.  He, along with the Oceania team, have done great work in a building a community, and that's everything I ask of them.  

    I have no desire to get into the specifics of your troubled history or to see this exchange continued.  Desist and bring your comments elsewhere.  Say whatever you want about me, but don't f@#k around with my allies.  I take that seriously, and I'm not as easygoing when it comes to protecting them.  

    • Upvote 2
  3. 38 minutes ago, Matt2004 said:

    ~snip~

    Given the timing, this seems like a last-minute publicity stunt.  It's action not forum announcements that will change the minds of Orbis.  I honestly hope you prove me wrong.

    • Upvote 3
  4. 10 minutes ago, Mikey said:

    On the one hand, I can get behind overthrowing Squeegee. On the other hand, when I retake my rightful throne, any remaining rebels might do well to remember what happened to the last few "Kings" in the North...

    Yes! @Squeegee the rightful king has returned.  Think of all the windows that you'll have time to clean.
    @Darth Ataxia I'm willing to be your Lady Olenna and Purple Wedding the sh*t out of SK if you can guarantee that Tommon Mikey will take his rightful place.
     

    • Upvote 2
    • Downvote 2
  5. I'm way too lazy to read all of this, but fwiw the concept of some idealized racial and ethnic is the foundation of fascism.  Fascism is only functional insofar as ethnonationalism is enforced.  People buy into the rigid social structure, bigotry and economic controls for some semblance of its "for the party" or "for the country."  This presents as some master race like the aryans in Germany, or–with your beloved Franco–the brutal crusade against the 'Jewish Masons' and the 'Moorish communists.'  Fascism is inherently a gateway to allowing bigotry, and I've got the lineage to understand that personally.  Understanding that institutional oppression towards "the other" enshrined in fascism will help you to understand why it's mostly not tolerated in Orbis even if it's allowed.  

    Speaking from experience, the models that do best here are meritocratic and usually authoritarian/benevolent dictator-type of governments.  If you're here for fascism, you're pushing the wrong level, and I'd suggest you reevaluate your priorities.  It's not a joke to some people to even RP prejudice, racism or any ideology presenting some form of structural violence as a tent.  

    • Upvote 5
  6. I don't feel like the OWR-Cam beef is the best way to put Cam in a good light @Abbas Mehdi lol.  That being said, I've known @King Arthur longer and perhaps better than most of you.  I think we had the first embassy with them outside of SCX-sphere (at the time), I've worked closely running a bank for him, and I count him as a friend.  

    From all of my experiences with them, I gathered that the war and the war plans CB was not something they were a part of.  It was a situation they were thrown into.  On the other hand, they're a loyal bunch and stuck by their allies for quite a while.  I think they ran out of resources very, very early on, and they still stayed in the war.  Yet as the war continued, it is true that Cam was a moderate actor but that moderation in the face of no influence translated into a lack of results.  IIRC, the biggest fear Cam had was retribution and a lack of protection if they left the war.  They were willing to leave along with TcW and co in that new bloc until things got complicated by the BoC/NP shenanigans.

    I don't think its right to absolve them of all guilt, but, at the same time, this is an alliance who tried to be loyal to its allies and protect its community without real the influence or access of IQ mainstays or people like Under and Sphinx.  I can somewhat relate to that struggle even if I don't exactly agree with how they handled it.  And frankly there is a lot more sincerity in Cam's experience than other alliances who left with the tide or simply wanted to hug pixels with the upper tier.  They have their work cut out for them, but I think that was inherent in their treaty with Rose.  A step forward for Cam and for changing the political dynamic.  

    To be clear though, I don't think pushing the IQ shtick helps anyone (that's mostly aimed at @Epi who I'm hoping guessing is trolling).  And the SCX raiding policy carbon copy is a bad look as I've expressed privately.  

  7. I think it's a bit naive to say that we should forget the past.  Last war really sucked.  In terms of players lost, disbandments, and pettiness, it is unparalleled.  And that same past should and hopefully will inform the future on how to prevent such conditions from being recreated.  I don't ever want to relive that again, and I'm sure others don't either.  People will keep their eyes out for actors who seem liable of repeating those mistakes.  To be clear though, I'm not advocating war–I abhor the idea of personal grudge-based warfare–but the idea of failing to recognize and learn from history might be just as worrisome.

    • Like 2
    • Upvote 3
  8. @Alex

    Hi, there seems to be a bug with bauxite production.  I think it still calculates the production bonus from the base of 6 mines versus 10.  

    Just some simple math here to figure this out:

    4946 * 3 * 1.3889 - 1600 = 19008.4982

    23624.6 + 1600 = 25224.6 -> 25224.6/(4946*3) = 1.7 or 70% bonus

     

    I'm not sure if this was intended or not, but I didn't get that from your report and there's still the inconsistency with the shown bonus production value.

    This will significantly affect how we approach our builds, so any comments/fixes on this would be really appreciated.  Thank you in advance.

     

    1118185598_ScreenShot2020-05-14at3_44_35PM.thumb.png.5f3cea2ebc810d19def20d8b0e3d4401.png

  9. I’d just like to point out that these events in their entirety should make no one happy.  It’s really disappointing all around, and we ought to maintain that solemnity.  I, for one, will not engage in hitting my enemies while they’re down.  Thank @Prefonteen for responding appropriately o7.

     

    Hopefully,  we can move on from the past and make a future where we don’t repeat these mistakes.  

    • Upvote 5
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.