Jump to content

Khai Jäger

Members
  • Posts

    108
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Khai Jäger

  1. What a glorious war that was. Respect to Pantheon for such a great victory despite the odds.
  2. Lmao, welcome back mate. Should have asked me to help you get your name back, #validCB.
  3. >Trying to change the game is futile and naive. >The only way to prove yourself is to drop out of the web. You finish by saying we defend eachother. So no, it's not a one sided deal or treaty. Even you admit it with your closing comment. All AK, Carthago, Yakuza, Solar and BK benefit from being tied together just as KETOG benefits from having eachother. You know, it's a fine mentality that dropping out of the web solves all our problems. However on a realistic perspective it doesn't. There will always be a set of drifting alliances hanging in-between spheres and blocs that individuals lean towards having friendship with via paper. I'm not saying KETOG or Chaos hasn't set a good example. I'm saying it can't apply to the entire game. Whether you disagree or not is up to debate, but it's obviously true if you look at the web as it is now. A matter of perspective. I don't need to convince you otherwise, cause frankly I don't intend to live in anyone's shadow. It is said that one who is quick to judge is not a good leader. However I'm certain less than 24 hours was enough for a conclusion. At the least I'm happy to recognize some form of change has occurred.
  4. Reasons to counter? The reasons were already there. About 5 Empy members attacked our prot who then attacked us directly. We slotted all of them after talking to you. So I'm not sure what you may be alluding to.
  5. So does that mean TEst and tS did horrible as well because they went negative in damages? We had whales bro, you didn't. One whale with 3k infra sets an auto negative 1+ billion.
  6. Article I. Defensive Activation We stand together Article II. Offensive Activation You will never stand alone Article III. Termination & Withdrawal Blood in, Blood out Tl:dr; YAkSoCa Bloc - Yakuza, Afrika Korps, Solar Knights & Carthago form a bloc
  7. Thou doesn't condone cheating? Omae Wa Mou Shindeiru. Anyways, welcome back tF.
  8. Perma-warring their alliance doesn't fix the issue. If you look on the member level, the members benefited without knowing that their gov was cheating so they aren't guilty.
  9. It's pretty clear the resources aided much more than just the gov, so the gov shouldn't be the only ones punished. Many members in Nova have jumped from 12 cities to 18 cities by means of grants from the generated res. They bought a city every 10 days for two months straight. All Nova members should at least lose all the cities made from the exploit date. However as Aris said, they have yet to be punished. There has only been a half fix to the exploit. My opinion on a good punishment would be to remove all the new cities plus x more cities from before the date if they have received any form of grant from the Nova bank. Pooball for example grew to 27 cities in 400 days, and we know that he's at least cheated on getting the last 4. He should lose half of 27, so be cut down to 13 cities or something. Another thing is that I remember rolling Nova in Knightfall personally, the alliance consisted of a small group and they still individually had something around 4b in cash and a solid alliance WC equivalent in quantity to what was stolen from Pantheon by Akuryo. So from my perspective, they've been at it from since they've founded. I do recall seeing a log of AD holding their bank for them at the time. I will see if I can find that log again.
  10. Shouldn't be long mate. lmao
  11. Much love @ThineHolySaint ♥️ No h o m o
  12. You could have just defended them in the first place.
  13. Just needed to emphasize that. ? I mean, hey... Why have paper with allies that the treaty chain aligns you with by default? The political issue isn't treaty cross signing within defined spheres at this point. What Chaos and KT sphere want is to have multiple clearly defined spheres to allow more dynamism, political maneuverability, and war. I genuinely like that idea.
  14. I wouldn't be free money if it's a fair trade. The only problem would be the resources lost if Sheepy doesn't put that res back in the market, so he's basically permanently turning x amount of res into cash. For all we know, that could be his goal. The nations doing the trades with sheepy don't gain anything more than the market price if I'm not mistaken.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.