Potato

Sounds like a decent idea

Haha, the infinity gauntlet one doesn't sound like a bad idea, not sure if there are any legal things stopping alex though

Scrapyard Decommition "x" amount of tanks/ships

My leader name is potato and this got me really confused for a second

ThE sYnDicAtE aNd iTs AfFiLiaTeS hAvE nO inTeNt To ExPaNd ThEir WaR oN tHe CoALitiOn CuRrEnTLy FigHtiNg ThE bLAcK kNigHtS aNd ThEir ALLieSbEyOnD gUaRdiAn AnD gRuMpY oLD bAsTaRdS.

I've always wanted to protect those poor souls in t$

One of the best mods on discord, best of luck

I disagree with this, this would make it very hard to grow anyone outside of top 30 (TCW, WTF, ODN, TRF, Guardian, ect) as it would make their sole form of growth being poaching. {Yes I realize TCW is not normally outside of top 30, but it would push out things like BoC or Camelot} finally everyone alliance is small at some point, if you can't recruit without being in top 30 you won't ever make it to top 30, it would just solidify the stronger alliances and make new growth much more difficult.

This loss hurt more than stepping on a Lego. . . It hurt more than getting hit in the ankle with a scooter. . . It hurt more than a paper cut between the fingers.

I like it, it makes large alliances think a bit more about stockpiling for months, while still allowing you to stockpile. I also like that the lost resources are offset by a reduction in battle cost.

I'm going to have to go with Buorhann here, these changes will help the larger nations way more than the smaller ones. I don't see a reason to try in a war that I got down declared if I can't even double buy to win after.

may I ask why it shows expected profits for primary resources (oil, iron, food, ect. . .) but not for secondary (steel, gas, ect. . .)

I would say good luck, but arrgh!

Not sure how I feel about this, I was in lord for awhile and I guess this closer will be good for all former members of lord.

best of luck on the new/old rebrand, we are assassins!