-
Posts
712 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by George
-
https://politicsandwar.com/alliances/treatyweb/
-
Glad this is up!
-
Jesus Wana, I don't know why your bothering to sit here and grandstand, the fact is your smart enough to know the reaction this will get and your smart enough to know damn well the game will see through this. Are you really going to try to continue to argue you don't want another HW war? So are you saying your now focused on Clock or going to roll spheres much smaller? Thank you for the great powers that be to once again force their way upon us all, much appreciated. Rose and T$ are both old alliances that have the skill and ability to form spheres around them creating a dynamic environment, this just kills politics. Taking a loss once a while is per corse of the game. <removed, accuracy> Syndi as far as I've even seen just wants to acquire power. Now on the other hand, Rose shocked me and disappointed me, after the long conversations I've had with Valk, Harry, Abbas and other representatives over the last few years, this move is completely out of step for what Rose claimed to be and stand for. Posting a chart that proves everyone's point was a curious decision, you through process must imagine we can't read through the lines and see the actual state of things.
-
1 week
- 35 replies
-
- 14
-
-
Actually no, even if a major partner of MHC is leaving, the treaty would still be binding for us to the remainder of the alliances. We choose to withdraw from that agreement ourself, to pursue alternatives options.
-
The Commonwealth Dept of Foreign Affairs “Strength through Growth and Unity” To whom it may concern, At this time tCW has issued our 72hr notice to Mile High Club. We no longer consider our position in MHC to be strategically viable. We wish all parties the best moving forward!
- 37 replies
-
- 17
-
-
-
-
Decent WoT, I actually agree that politics have tanked and become almost non-existent over the last few years. However I do believe there are a few main reasons that address this issue. 1. The forums have become essentially a announcement board. Until recently nothing political was being discussed. I actually love the forums, it provides a well documented account of activities and peoples PoV at the time. In the current era of news servers discussions are easily lost, this kills any accountability for actors with flaky stances. 2. Shifts in peoples perspectives regarding war being short and ending in WP. I point to this as the main cause. This shift has killed the ability of people to actually be political long term because you are expected to drop grievances immediately. While I do believe no grudge should last forever, I believe some do certainty add to the political game and should run their coarse. In the same aspect I dont think wars should last to long but wars that are to short just dont add to the game either. 2.5 More related to #2 is CBs, Adam covered this really well, it appears having a CB is almost pointless at this point, I really wish we could back track and go back to actually caring about getting a valid CB. 3. There is a general lack in peoples willingness to be "political" publicly. Everything is back door and does not really hit the same way. While it was certainly a shit show, I think having political leaders arguing their positions on radio shows (and forums) in front of members of every sphere really helped shape things. These events may have been minor in the grand scheme of things but these are the only avenues members have to get a glimpse of politics. It got members involved in the overall field, X is mad at X, my alliance doesn't like Y because of Z. As of late when it comes to wars I find myself and my government, allies ect looking at charts and sphere sizes more than anything. Threats are not because of political events, threats come from what spheres are close in size, because we are also close in size. I believe in the effort to make the game less toxic, we went to far and took away the political part of politics and war Peace Terms: Jesus, yes, these need to come back and ASAP, they added a huge political resource to add to the overall political field. While i still dislike and will never support reps, I do think some (within reason) peace terms should certainly be added. The point of the war is to make your opponent take more losses than your own, so the idea of just letting people off makes no sense to me (on wars with actual CBs). With that said id support terms on wars that are within reason...
-
[DoE+Treaty] Cancelled plans leads to new connections.
George replied to Big Mac's topic in Alliance Affairs
Excited for this -
A match made in heaven
-
16th January 2022 To Whom it may concern, Effective immediately the following alliances have been granted full membership into Mystery Inc United Purple Nations The Federation Dark Brotherhood The mentioned alliances agree to the terms of the original treaty. Effective in 72 hours from now the following alliance announced their exit from Mystery Inc The Commonwealth Signed - Global Alliance & Treaty Organization: KittenGosCrazy - Minister of Foreign Affairs Greywall - Assembly Chairman The General Assembly The Commonwealth: Prime Minister: RightHonorable Chief of Staff: Jeric, Lionstar Foreign Secretary: Azazel The Federation: Kosta, King and Lord Ambassador Shohan, Ambassador Jerry, Ambassador The United Socialist Nations: Darvolt - Vanguard Matrix - Vanguard United Purple Nations: Cora McStrap - Prime Minister Cameron Axley - Chief of Staff Farkistan: Kitschie, Head of FA Bozzie, Head of MA RhealLuhn, Head of IA Ampersand: Kilo - Drunken Rambler Hannah - Glittery One And and and and and Dark Brotherhood: Arima - Listener Jon - Listener CCJK - Keeper
- 15 replies
-
- 14
-
-
-
-
-
[Treaty]TFP Finds Its Johnson: An Adoption Story
George replied to Kevanovia's topic in Alliance Affairs
Do I have to wait for 2023 to vote for this -
Was fun while it lasted
-
None of our gov who has had access to this has spoken publicly? Unless ofc your referring to another alliance or sphere entirely?
-
I see reading comprehension is not one of your strong suits, to break down my statement. We have refused requests to help hit you (and now we feel we should have considered), but dont worry my grammar may be off but comprehension isn't a issue. Ill be sure to shoot intel your way since your obviously a great friend of ours. We said we would consider the proposal, we were then added to a group chat where BW reps laid out the plan. I believe Oasis / Minc may have said yes or atleast voiced interest when making the tie public (your idea) was on the table. We then backed out later when the true scale came out and MINC had time to discuss it at more detail. Unrelated? I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of you being mad of spheres working together when you banded over half the game (well tried) a mere 3 months ago. If you wanted to truly unwind / deescalate, you would have less cryptic, especially regarding a time frame. Your essentially yelling at someone for missing a deadline that was never set. Once again your obv think a smaller sphere (Minc is outnumbered by Clock in every tier) should just take the L for others amusement, being from Syndicate this is a completely normal opinion for you to have, it comes from your roots. I cant really put anything else here due to your obvious lack of putting anything of substance in your post, furthering the likely hood of my original thought that this is being used as a easy escape from a far scarier and unknown outcome.
-
Cute bait. No amended statement required. Refer to my last post
-
I think Ill decline to toss a source under the bus for your amusement and gratification. At the end of the day you admitted / proved we were correct (at least in part), asking for evidence is just a silly tactic to try to take away from the overall picture of the bs narrative your peddling. Ill be over here for you to wake up from whatever day dream your in.
-
Off did not mean to hurt your feelings and force you to post on the OWF
-
AHHH yes this will be a hard war for you.
-
Ah yes, our fantastic mind reading abilities picked up on your intentions early on? Massive military uptick and ss of plots to hit us but MINC man bad for responding. As I've stated multiple times Clock is larger than MINC in essentially every tier, not to mention your mega whale tier. The fact if I take your word at face value, still negated the fact that we had no way in knowing you planned a smaller attack. Being overpowered (from what we knew), having limited options we went to the only other sphere able to help us. At this point go ahead and admit it, do you expect alliances to just accept negative odds? Covered in all my posts. God this is a brilliant statement. Are you referring to before or after CATA refused to join minc and quite literally I quote "Can we just take Weeb, TCW and &? Give the others back to Oasis? Lol". Obviously we declined for clear reasons, and lets not play games, Aurora for some reason thought MINC was "to big". Weebinsm has just been following Aurora, I can literally count on 2 hands the amount of times they even spoke in our server. I really have issues believing you are buying your own farts here?
- 122 replies
-
- 13
-
-
-
What? Can you pin point a date between sept 18 2021 and today that you took a radical 180 in your thought process. I seem to recall multiple conversations with you asking us to assist you (and Rose) in a massive offensive war against TKRGG. It was us who decided that it was overkill, you even kept pushing the matter with Rose to get us on board after our blatant refusal. Is the issue that only you are allowed to form agreements and connections between blocs or is it that they must be secrete? Gee, its almost like when you ghost our rep its hard to get answers, unless you count your "totally in good faith" discussion with Oasis that led to exactly what you requested (MDP dropped), yet decided it was not quick enough for you. I seem to recall this same MO from Syndisphere days, glad to see you still have it in you! *cricket sounds* This is a joke right, we publicly stated our treaty was temp, defensive in nature and the target of said treaty was obvious to you. Where is the threat to BW again? Ohhhhh it may be the rest of Orbis, but your threat is not in this conflict. Quite frankly id put money on you entering this conflict to avoid a greater and potentially less certain one? I used word of mouth and rumors to convince my gov Oasis / Minc man bad**** and immediately created a secrete treaty Clock outnumbers MINC is essentially every teir, and on top of that has mega whales that we do not. Every other bloc is involved in a nap, of coarse we worked with Oasis! What do you expect, me to ring up the Johnson's. This is gripping at straws and over complicating a basic issue. lol Yes I have reflected and decided I should have taken offers from other non oasis spheres to hit you seriously
- 77 replies
-
- 14
-
-
-
-
-
The argument here reads basically as > How dare you make a defensive agreement that's so big rather than a offensive colo > This grouping is to large for a offensive and would be a dogpile. Reminder* Even IF we wanted to reach out to someone other than Oasis, the NAP is still in play for most players. We are very limited on who we are able to work with especially on short notice, I would almost bet no matter what sphere we work with, it would cause the numbers to be "to big". On that note I am happy to be working with Oasis, as there great peeps. Point being, no matter who we work with, the grouping / colo will be big. You are correct we were not part of the last war, however the other option was to add on to a dog pile, we had no place in the war and were not needed; additionally Gun and Roses occurred right after The Last Ride so obvs we were not ready for that one. I believe the correct decision was made. Sure we all accept the "inherit risk" of being a smaller sphere but when larger spheres target the smallest one, I dont think anyone will just accept the inherit risk, especially when the disparity is so big . What's humorous to me is the "causing stagnation" narrative that has been stated a few times, this narrative actually made me laugh irl. The fact that any sphere or alliance or person can try to claim that MINC or even Oasis is the reason for stagnation is absurd. There is already a huge disparity in tiering and scale, if the smaller spheres fight each other we just further the divide and do more harm to ourselves. I am not saying by any means that smaller spheres "shouldn't" fight, I am saying it shouldn't be done to fulfill the satisfaction of other spheres and alliances. All this does is take the light off the alliances that actually are stagnating the game and politics.
-
Member Title Camelot FA This has been on my profile for a while, however I can no longer find / get to the option to change it. Can you remove it please
-
I'm not sure if your referring to us making it public or us calling it a MDP is the issue? or both...., on the point of making us a bigger target, I cant deny the fact for a small bit of time out overall numbers will be "large", however I feel with the positions and beliefs we discussed in private and public with other leadership they will recognize (atleast in private) were not a major threat to them or even the short term meta.