Tevron

A NAP bloc seems like the kind of thing that you try to sleep off and forget about rather than post publicly.

Welcome Back Coach. We missed you.

Your first bit is exactly my point. The system and stats in general of $$ gained and lost will do little to properly measure the war's effects. Using score is just as dumb. So since you agreed with me, I guess I'll just try to answer your question. I don't have to parrot or agree with uninformed members within my own alliance and they are not my "sonny". They are an alliance member and I'll defend them on the battlefield, but not in OOC rhetorical discussions. I think they can manage that much on their own. As for me, I represent myself and not some vague side when I'm on the forums; I would suggest that you form your own opinions as well instead of operating under the wrong premises of others. My point is that it is idiotic to measure the monetary cost since it excludes the factors that will eventually result in a peace, and that the current mechanics enforce that the underdog pay less money to do more damage. That's why you know, I responded to a post about the stats and not the rest of this trainwreck.

I think the OP is a shit post, but your reply is also a pretty big one. War in this game is set up so that high city count nations can just buy soldiers and fight with no munitions at 600 infra forever and "outdamage" literally any nations in their range. I wouldn't be surprised if you end up "outcosting" the enemy coalition in the damage charts if you drag it out for five months. The hilarity of this is that you even being able to nuke a member of GATO precludes the broken system that allows you to outdamage and outcost opponents after losing a bunch of wars. Those stats don't include the loss of income generation, city growth, etc, either. Not to mention loss of recruits. After the initial blow ups of infrastructure and military, it's not like anyone could expect Quack to buy up, because they'll just get knocked down again, so instead they will just endlessly suicide their soldiers into low tier nations to burn munitions and steel used to maintain advantages over them in land battles, since the actual cost of them losing these fights is almost nothing. I have half a mind from reading such nonsensical drivel to become momentarily active enough in this game's community to type up as much to point out the deep flaws of these mechanics, but I've been recently assured that they will make changes re; what is clearly an illogical system. vanishes back into the void.

Congratulations to us and them.

Aha, you got em DVD (not Blueray?)! Everyone knows that if you speak the truth you can't be hostile!!! /s/

Since Idk what it is going on I'll just button up ! XD

How even do you get off dicking on your own friends like that though? I know I've likely missed context on what you're doing here, but I don't get why you would do that to someone who has always had your back.

Curious, because the image kind of messes it up. What's the Infra Cost for BK?

Huh, didn't know you were around Rob. Hit me up on discord sometime.

Aww you're making me blush. This is why we made a band, folks!

Oh my lord. BritishDude still lives?

Responding to someone doesn't grant them relevance. I'll help you out with a definition. He's not relevant because it isn't appropriate for him to post and he isn't closely connected. Glad to be of service. Also, join our discord channel peeps, we're happy to have anyone

Are you recruiting from within AIM?

Cute, but isn't that what you did? Or are you fizzling back in now?