Jump to content

katashimon13

Members
  • Posts

    563
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by katashimon13

  1. condolences to all involved rawr
  2. y not just... add knowledge base things to wiki? rawr
  3. the bougie pplz taught me that word this had to have been suggested before but... basically bounties are p lame because of the blockade rule to stop them from affecting other wars/cheating/watever u can only really pull it off reliably if you get some people to fill slots for u @ dtc i had a 1 mil bounty on me through so so many wars if not multiple years there is no real incentive to cause chaos as intended if the risk one takes.... even upon completion cannot be rewarded just because someone else blockaded change it to not reward the money until like no wars are happening on that nation for x time then maybe it will be worth throwing money on nations because pirates or seedy "profit" driven individuals can actually see profit at the end of it if they decide to ignore the FA ramifications ;3 rawr
  4. have you asked ur alliance? sometimes pplz have historical data i do not think there is a similar breakdown to the nation page on the alliance scale no rawr
  5. just make it a bil plus the cosmetics frankly is a negligible amount to add to the game esp after how much was added to the game via multiple instances rampant cheating and will actually incentivize people to come help outside the the regular tryhards make piracy great again 🏴‍☠️ as ive said plenty of times b4 war is economics with explosions xP and as i said plenty of times before mobilizing pplz economically should be effort embargo bad can confirm havent ran out of stockpiles since knightfall p.s. FACTORIOOOOOOOOOOOOO @Avatar Patrick thanks for ruining cycles on me in the past ;3 agreed humans are terrible and we should all stop perpetuating progress in our personalized purgatories of posturing politics and performative plutonium p.s. hai callisto rawr
  6. step 0.5 is still relephant as well rawr
  7. i am aware of how it works and its "simplicity" that is the last option or at least it was... we have skipped everything in between to address embargoes just because its possible/easier to implement? and was misrepresented in the QoL compilation thread (by a supporter) does not mean it actually had any level of unanimous support in any of the threads where it has been brought up i am definitely for and have been for a better system (tracking management etc etc) but giving all power away to the few AND have it be opt out is way too far these games are fueled by and live on interpersonal interaction this is just leaders avoiding dealing with members it is not an ease of access issue ....else the other things would have been implemented/pushed for prior as ive stated before the option should not be there at all and there -should- be effort involved in rallying troops whether it be militarily economically or culturally rawr
  8. semi regular reminder that alliance controlled embargoes bad @Alex... still have no idea why you allowed this through...i guess everyone else giving up and certain other people whispering in your ear over the years broke it down you ... arent wrong https://forum.politicsandwar.com/index.php?/topic/27593-let-alliances-embargo/&do=findComment&comment=460713 rah rah baseball rawr
  9. unironically saying anything else is propaganda AND purporting abbas as a reasonable source yikers rawr
  10. i know this is a reach... but i feel like you would be able to tell the difference even on this "small" of a scale ;3 rawr
  11. do.... the mods/other admin not help with that giant backlog at all? ........ i understand wanting to handle things your way but like... shirley some of it can be filtered with a bias toward heavy caution? like tiered moderation???? so lets say... someone knowingly filled spy slots multiple times.... lets say over the course of 2 weeks? and they were reported multiple times over the course of these 2 weeks.... how many warnings would they have on their nation... would they still be allowed to play? the rules state that its an offense to assist the defending nation... if one is declaring for beige... it would be assisting the aggressor not the defender (at least with how wars actually go and there is no real even amount of slots in a set range) rawr
  12. pbbgs were a mistake rawr
  13. Sure y not?... or a csv export? i dont actually know if this has an api call now rawr
  14. Please explain ur case @Pascal unless you want me to be up in arms about baseball or something xP rawr
  15. since we are rehashing old memes its always u old man rawr
  16. old man is old and missed that this was part of the point xP rawr
  17. reminder that alliance controlled embargo is bad but also please give alliance controlled military rawr
  18. its good enough you would have military units etc rawr
  19. @Alex this post right here *insert image of someone on phone heer* rawr
  20. 20 whole players oh no the horror no really if u want us to have an actual discussion give numbers rawr
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.