Jump to content

James II

Members
  • Posts

    1332
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by James II

  1. What happened to all those HoNoR thY TrEaTy people?
  2. CoA thanks you all for willingly sacrificing your citizens to Atom. Most are not so eager for Atom's embrace!
  3. Yes because this is a dichotomy.
  4. Alexio leaking out of context on allies he doesn't like. This is what? The dozenth time he's done this?
  5. And allying 70% of the game via secret treaties to take out 10% with no CB is an okay prescedent?
  6. TI violates treaty, then cries about it when they get hit and claims after the fact that aurora violated a non existent treaty clause? Plotting against your ally while allied to them warrants you getting rolled by them. You also actively sabotaged the previous war trying to get aurora, CoA, and Hive to absorb damage for you, citing your infra as priority. You absolutely deserve this. For posterity:
  7. I told y'all I would hit you for poor beige discipline. Try saving your infra now Tyrion!
  8. Cool effort. If you ever want to make more fancy speeches feel free to join CoA!
  9. Lots of wars recently. Who said multipolar was bad for the game?
  10. I don't think TKR is bad. I had no interest in hitting TKR again. They are no longer the problem in the game. Thank you for proving one of my points!
  11. No on blanketed TKR/Wayward. At least I didn't. I merely pointed out the irony of Mayor's silence over the years, and the fact that he's in the alliance that is likely the largest offender of fighting in 'dog piles.' You can step off your mini horse.
  12. I love how suddenly people are 'opposed' to dog piling wars. Couldn't get a peep out of them when certain spheres/alliances went around dogpiling in much greater numbers.? nevermind the history of the alliance, likely the largest offender of 'dog piles.'
  13. Cata trying to get us to hit Rose and t$ instead of TKR back in June makes a little more sense now.
  14. This is how people have been playing the game for how long? Suddenly you want to change how the rule is enforced. You're being inconsistent. I think that's what the outrage is about. You still do damage to someone when you declare on them, you cost them more money and who knows you might get an opportunity to get a missile or nuke. Expecting nations in a losing war to do nothing and get beat down indefinitely is an unrealistic expectation on your part.
  15. People did get upset with y'alls behavior. That was the whole point of knightfall. You consolidated the upper tiers, much like you have done now, and went around hitting people significantly weaker than you. I don't understand why you're so upset! We're 17 nations, y'all are over 200. We didn't even hit Grumpy and the salt is flowing from you.
  16. I can't imagine why people would be upset with Grumpy for only making offensive efforts in dog piles, then find it amusing when 200+ nations can't handle the 17 Grumpy would normally be harassing to secure and consolidate the upper tier.
  17. Llama head. Never call randy a horse! He's liable to raid your village for that!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.