Indger

Good poll from the dev team 😛

Happy for my bruhs!!

Good luck!

This is the syndicate prot claiming guy right?

This is nice. Thank y'all for the trading profits!

Cool! Happy Birthday, congratulations! Gib party now!

I don't think anybody else can represent what name I like and narrow them down. Earlier method was better. The reps have also been trying to push for one particular name, which is as per they like.

Return to Forums!

c1-10: What is this a nation for ants c11-15: Sub-micro tier c16-20: Micro tier c21-25: Bottom tier c26-30: Low tier c31-35: Mid tier c36+: Normal nation size This is what being allied to Grumpy is like. These are our official war coordination channels

I support none of these. I like the current things how they are.

Ty, it was a concern polaris linking spheres, and yes nobody lives in this game, but considering polaris' reputation regarding activity, one needs to remind them

You still have a active treaty with rose in game, i think 72hrs are over. Can you explain?

Idk what problem you have with me coming in, but thanks for calling me nice, i indeed am. Let me get straight to the point too. MHC didn't exist during that war, it was rosesphere, afterwards you also got TcW and Wei which got you a good tiering. It was the fairest 1v1 war we had recently. Because of the blitz advantage, clock won, if it would have been otherwise, rose would have won too. For BW, BW had also been adding peripheral alliances. There were many changes in blocs and therefore each bloc upsized by a bit and not over expanding And for HW, we had a weak mid tier, TI was added to have some decent presence in the mid tier. And for BW losing the previous war was which i do think they could have given a fair fight if t$ wouldn't have demilled on the second day and they didn't take any action even even they had a short notice of the blitz. Probably you should read @hidude45454's text in DNN in his show channel. That explains how BW could have fought back and that too very well. As for the formation of Ro$e, i am only against the double standards. One is saying it isn't a anti-HW move or a anti-GG thing or is not related to HW and from someone else i am getting that it is to put a check on HW and it's existence. I like that at least if in future we are in a war, we can have a fair 1v1 fight eventhough the scales are very slightly tipped towards your advantage, so idrc abt your tiering or the treaty or if you are trying to be competitive unless it is for fighting HW because another leader is saying that they want to improve relationships and let bygones be bygones. (That's why i didn't even quote WANA when he put his stance). But to me it does seem that the target of this treaty is us, that's why i am against it.

What do you have against GG? Leaders from your blocs have been saying abt letting bygones be bygones and I don't understand why you all bring HW in it then, is HW the real reason of this bloc formation? So you all just want HW to downsize?

We signed TI a lot later after brawlywood. So cannot be considered that we took an L and signed them. There were many changes in blocs and we found our mid tier wasn't even competitive. Why do you think this would be preferred to the multipolarity we had? You all are getting pointed out because you did what you said in past that you wouldn't do.

So we should take it that this treaty was again to be anti GG? I thought WANA said they didn't sign this to be against HW.

Are you all a part of back room or just peripheral alliance of back room?

Nice bloc, good luck

Good luck!

Good luck!

Good luck!

Where da wei goin?

No to hard cap. One suggestion is that i should get to kick baseball players, and buy a new on for some money so that i Dont have to spend money on maximizing my team by upgrading older players.

Above c25, and yes to all

gLhf