Jump to content

[DEBATE] Militarism


Franz Von Dietrich
 Share

Recommended Posts

@Fox It wouldn't cause another earthquake, but just cause a simple cork in place. ;) And, treaties are completely useless, just a way for people to build their armed forces up and strike back

Treaties are worthless? Then why is NATO the sole power in the world? Treaties are nothing more than the concept of "agreement", signed on paper by participating parties. This is something you see in every day life from monetary transactions to birth certificates and marriage. It's simply a way of proving that two or more parties have agreed on something. But I'm not sure why you felt the need to mention that.

 

And it actually wouldn't be a cork or anything, it would do absolutely nothing.

 

I should have known better than to try to debate in PW. This might as well have been posted in spam.

Edited by Fox Fire

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No militarism= no Russia, US, or ISIS. Bad for economy. Loves militarism but not Russia or ISIS. lol

True,

If not militarism, North Korea, China would stay as a west colony by western Powers and slave labors.

Embrace USA militarism!

 

militarism is good only in passive defense.

Edited by Arthur James
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.What do you mean natural disasters? How can a military stop an earthquake? XD

2.We have the police to fight crime, not an army. Sending an army against a bank robber is over doing it, don't you think?

3.If another country declares war on them, they can always try to make deals and treaties to get things figured out.

If USA never attacked Iraq, there would be no ISIS...If WWI never happened, nether would have WWII.

You can NEVER get total peace from war. The only thing war bring is more war...

Without WWI, Germany would have had 4.4 million jobs in their army thus preventing a world war 2 by Hitler. War brings what? JOBS TO AMERICAN PEOPLE! (America never stays neutral) ISIS wouldn't have started because the Ottoman Empire could (in theory, it was declaring) rule their land and it'd be hard to create a militia under an empire. Unless you were in the wrong side of the Armenian Genocide, this all should be good. Austria wouldn't have had their heir destroyed, and the Soviets would never existed. like they did during the war. Eliminating jobs world wide in the military. Soviets helped caused the cold war creating billions or trillions of jobs. War is good for economy if the country can live. Peace is bad. There was a country murderless for 6 months. That was followed by a massacre nationwide. I forget what country that happened in so if you want to void that part, you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're wrong. Reasons.

 

This would all come down to some utopian stuff. Do you really want that debate?

I'm not entirely sure, but the way you say it makes it sound like it might be bad. :unsure:

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without WWI, Germany would have had 4.4 million jobs in their army thus preventing a world war 2 by Hitler. War brings what? JOBS TO AMERICAN PEOPLE! (America never stays neutral) ISIS wouldn't have started because the Ottoman Empire could (in theory, it was declaring) rule their land and it'd be hard to create a militia under an empire. Unless you were in the wrong side of the Armenian Genocide, this all should be good. Austria wouldn't have had their heir destroyed, and the Soviets would never existed. like they did during the war. Eliminating jobs world wide in the military. Soviets helped caused the cold war creating billions or trillions of jobs. War is good for economy if the country can live. Peace is bad. There was a country murderless for 6 months. That was followed by a massacre nationwide. I forget what country that happened in so if you want to void that part, you can.

Wwi and wwii were started in order to create Israel and league of nations/UN.

 

Wwi didn't quite do the trick, so Wwii was necessary. Powerful men wanted the world to end up the way it has. It was a foregone conclusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not entirely sure, but the way you say it makes it sound like it might be bad. :unsure:

I would debate that land should not be owned. For that to work, we would have to never settle down as farmers. There would be nothing worth defending. We would be happy, healthy hunter-gatherers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wwi and wwii were started in order to create Israel and league of nations/UN.

 

Wwi didn't quite do the trick, so Wwii was necessary. Powerful men wanted the world to end up the way it has. It was a foregone conclusion.

As insane as that sounds, it's totally possible.

 

 

I would debate that land should not be owned. For that to work, we would have to never settle down as farmers. There would be nothing worth defending. We would be happy, healthy hunter-gatherers.

I agree. But if we stayed as hunter gatherers (especially with todays population) the earth would be barren already. I don't disagree with farming, but owning land is just as unnecessary as militaries and war. Cycles of endless violence only happen when both sides are too stupid to contemplate beyond their own egos. We are the only species capable of mass murdering each other for the sake of absolutely nothing.

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like whenever Fox Fire comes along all the fun and games suddenly get brutally murdered. Just like those children selling lemonade. I have know doubt that Foxfire would then argue that this is a debate thread, but really as a Supreme Dicta- I mean Grand Chancellor I'm not sure I care.

So if you excuse me, I'm going to continue funneling soldiers into the fault line.


"Dang Socialists, always ruining all the fun with their smarter economic policies. I don't want my people to be equally paid, Dammit!"
- Varspasian

THE FASCIST REPUBLIC


OF


SILISTRIOUS


THE REAL P&W FASCIST

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems like whenever Fox Fire comes along all the fun and games suddenly get brutally murdered. Just like those children selling lemonade. I have know doubt that Foxfire would then argue that this is a debate thread, but really as a Supreme Dicta- I mean Grand Chancellor I'm not sure I care.

 

So if you excuse me, I'm going to continue funneling soldiers into the fault line.

 

 

"Dang Socialists, always ruining all the fun with their smarter economic policies. I don't want my people to be equally paid, Dammit!"

- Varspasian

Oh. I'm sorry. I thought the debate section was for serious conversation. Not In Character bullshit.

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh. I'm sorry. I thought the debate section was for serious conversation. Not In Character !@#$.

I predicted the future! What did I say? Oh isn't it great to be a supreme dicta- damn it I gotta stop saying that...

 

 

"Dang Socialists, always ruining all the fun with their seriousness. Dammit!"

- Varspasian

THE FASCIST REPUBLIC


OF


SILISTRIOUS


THE REAL P&W FASCIST

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As insane as that sounds, it's totally possible.

It's insane and antisemitic, so yeah. There's lots of evidence...but the sources are insane and antisemitic.

 

That's the beauty of the thing. It's too crazy and sensitive to even question it.

 

 

I agree. But if we stayed as hunter gatherers (especially with todays population) the earth would be barren already. I don't disagree with farming, but owning land is just as unnecessary as militaries and war. Cycles of endless violence only happen when both sides are too stupid to contemplate beyond their own egos. We are the only species capable of mass murdering each other for the sake of absolutely nothing.

Today's population never would have happened. The world would be in balance as nature intended.

 

You can farm without owning land. The problem is the land owns you. You can't leave and thugs can come and raid you, so you have to pay (taxes) a thugs to protect you from other thugs. Thus, governments and militaries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's insane and antisemitic, so yeah. There's lots of evidence...but the sources are obvious and legit, yet make it easy to play the anti-semite card if ever questioned.

 

That's the beauty of the thing. It's too crazy and sensitive to even question it.

 

 

 

Today's population never would have happened. The world would be in balance as nature intended.

 

You can farm without owning land. The problem is the land owns you. You can't leave and thugs can come and raid you, so you have to pay (taxes) a thugs to protect you from other thugs. Thus, governments and militaries.

No disagreement there.

But fixed that for ya.

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like American Oligarchy. The only place on earth where selling lemonade is a serious crime. I mean, we can't allow children to cut into the profits of Starbucks n !@#$.

 

Sure. If you're a radical Salafist or a Zionist. Other than that, no, not really.

 

Wouldn't that just cause another earthquake?

They're just joking, damnit Foxy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.What do you mean natural disasters? How can a military stop an earthquake? XD

2.We have the police to fight crime, not an army. Sending an army against a bank robber is over doing it, don't you think?

3.If another country declares war on them, they can always try to make deals and treaties to get things figured out.

If USA never attacked Iraq, there would be no ISIS...If WWI never happened, nether would have WWII.

You can NEVER get total peace from war. The only thing war bring is more war...

1a. To prevent: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Army_Corps_of_Engineers

1b. To aid after it happens: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_and_rescue

2. Most cops don't fire their weapon in the line of duty. If a Boston Marathon type scenario happens (the manhunt part), will the regular police respond properly if they found him? Remember that a lot of the police were working 19+ hours at a time. 

3. Politics can fail. Then what? In the American Civil War, both sides tried to get peace. 

If we never attacked Iraq, Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups would get the idea that it is ok to attack us. People thought WWI would end all wars. WWII was caused by France's peaceful set of mind. If France mobilized and went into Poland before Hitler did, Hitler would have probably not attacked. France had one of the largest armies at the time. 

You can NEVER get total peace. Ever. 

NODOLsmall.png.a7aa9c0a05fa266425cd7e83d8ccb3dd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, and be totally demolished because of the costs it would take to keep up on an agreement when they avoided war and settled to appease because they had no money. czechoslovakia had a standing army ready to defend, but didn't because they had no aid from France or Britain. Also, what about the Rhineland? There was suppose to be an army there. But the Third Reich didn't need to fire anything. The allies had the chance.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

France wouldn't have invaded Poland. They would have just stationed units there to prevent Adolf from invading Poland.

Idk that there was any opportunity to do that. I doubt France had time to mobilize or an invite from Poland. And France couldn't even defend their own nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're just joking, damnit Foxy

I'm aware. I'm just trying to make the discussion more serious.

 

 

But to be serious, without Militarism you wouldn't have a poweful nation. (Looking at North Korea and China). Having a Militarized society protects your independence, because treatys are just pieces of papers, no one will actually listen to those, if they come in with full force of a invasion.

Well sure. Militaries are practically inevitable for the most powerful nations.

However, I don't view militaries as actually being necessary mostly because I don't believe nationalism or nations are necessary. It's just a piss poor excuse to mass murder each other over a planet that only permits us to even exist.

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure the excuse for WW2 was crushing reparations. Why would France invade Poland?

I'm pretty sure there were several excuses that equally contributed.

 

czechoslovakia had a standing army ready to defend, but didn't because they had no aid from France or Britain.

chekersland was also invaded virtually on horseback. Europe could have easily stopped the entire war right there.

 

The allies had the chance.

Apparently nobody thought Hitler was a bad guy until he started killing people.

Edited by Fox Fire

Fox_Fire_Txt2.png

_________________________________________________________________

<Jroc> I heard \ is an anagram of cocaine
<\> I can't be rearranged into a line, I already am a line.

--Foxburo Wiki--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk that there was any opportunity to do that. I doubt France had time to mobilize or an invite from Poland. And France couldn't even defend their own nation.

They had warning that there would have been an invasion. Tanks sitting on a border tends to be a warning of an invasion. 

 

Apparently nobody thought Hitler was a bad guy until he started killing people.

His troops were massing on the Polish border. 

NODOLsmall.png.a7aa9c0a05fa266425cd7e83d8ccb3dd.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1.What do you mean natural disasters? How can a military stop an earthquake? XD

2.We have the police to fight crime, not an army. Sending an army against a bank robber is over doing it, don't you think?

3.If another country declares war on them, they can always try to make deals and treaties to get things figured out.

If USA never attacked Iraq, there would be no ISIS...If WWI never happened, nether would have WWII.

You can NEVER get total peace from war. The only thing war bring is more war...

If USA hadn't attacked Iraq there wouldn't be ISIS? That is probably one of the single most IGNORANT statements I have ever heard in my life. Just... What?!

  • Upvote 1

Contact me if you have questions, concerns, or just want to chat. I have an open door policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wwi and wwii were started in order to create Israel and league of nations/UN.

 

Wwi didn't quite do the trick, so Wwii was necessary. Powerful men wanted the world to end up the way it has. It was a foregone conclusion.

Wat? Where have you been getting your history? A conspiracy theorist?

Contact me if you have questions, concerns, or just want to chat. I have an open door policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.