Jump to content

namukara

Members
  • Posts

    507
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by namukara

  1. Well, I only report because I have an interest in seing the rules upheld. I'm sure that's something you'd understand, but since goons, who usually do such a good job of doing this sometimes let some inappropriate fields fall through the net, I feel I'm doing everyone a favour by making sure that they don't go unreported.
  2. I don't see how tipple nicklers is accepted, I'm sure you'd report it if it was in another alliance
  3. I'm not sure how this hasn't been reported yet, so if it's a duplicate report sorry. https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=186528 Nation name: large hardon collider Hardon being as everybody knows a word used to refer to an erection. Nation has been called large hardon collider for long enough that someone so active would have realised his mistake (if he was trying to name it large hadron collider) in time to get it rectified.
  4. Having now read the information, I can give a more considered response, rather than...you know, someone who just got pissed that all his alliances allies peaced out without letting us know first. I can understand why you did it. The contents of those leaked logs were disgusting, and reveal the rather unpleasant opinion of some of our current allies towards this whole sphere, which has taken billions in damage in order to support them. The post from Akuryo is indefenceable, the rest simply unpleasant. As it is however I won't be calling for TI to remove itself from the war. I see the threat to the game from an IQ victory of too great a cost to recommend such an exit, but understand why Pantheon, Schrute, DH, Horsemen and WTF believed differently. I don't begrudge you your peace and I thank you for standing with TI for the time you did.
  5. How much gas and mun for that massively distructive strike? If it's 1 of either of those it's more than the money damage it did.
  6. War: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=589300 Another war between black knights and Acadia. Declaring nation launches a naval attack, which hits a city with 946 infra. Declaring nation currently has 30 ships, yet total infrastructure damage is only 1.6. Seems unlikely he is using his full forces here.
  7. I don't know if it'll induce a seizure, but it definitely crashes screen readers.
  8. The reason that many here believe that this bot is illegal is that it does not actually require the bankers nation to be active to make the withdrawal. Therefore, it gives an advantage to BK (and anybody using this bot) that those of us without access to such programing knowledge do not have. If I wanted to withdraw my resources or money from TI bank, I have to wait for Tyrion to be online. This is not the case for BK: meaning that a nation could theoretically put their money in the bank, get beiged and then remove it without having to wait for the banker to be online. This instancy is a luxury that the rest of us do not have.
  9. Nation Link: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/id=3406 Name(s) in question: Tipple Nicklers Is the name(s) for leader, nation, or city? Nation Pretty obvious useof spoonerism to hide nation name 'nipple ticklers,' which I find would be unlikely to be accepted.
  10. I agree that a tool which allows funds to be withdrawn from the bank without the banker needing to be active increases unfairness within the game and should be banned. Games should not be 'code to win,' if your banker can't log on for a while then you don't get the cash out of the bank. Even if it is 'your own money,' that's part of the risk of making a safety deposit. I deposited some money and resources with the TI bank, if I want to get them back and tyrion isn't online, kind of going to struggle with that one. It must be noted as well that this makes it extremely easy for BK members to bank potential loot just before beige, as they are fully aware they can instantly get it back. The rest of us don't have that security.
  11. They were a TI prot, they responded when we got blitzed.
  12. Come back to us when we blitz them for it. Except that won't happen, because we have morals.
  13. TI to-do list: 1. Win war 2. Sign non-traitor prots
  14. Does this work both ways? Can we simply tell IQ we don't want to play with them, and they'll be forced to allow everybody to leave under a white peace?
  15. I think everyone should be able to play the game how they like. Don't you?
  16. Sorry about that, I saw other people expressing their war reasons so I thought it best to give mine. The international lawyer in me can't help but remind you that the UDHR is not legally binding
  17. With regards TMC/Fark relations, you were probably not the best placed people in the world to judge that, that would be tmc and fark. Given the response, I think it is clear that it can still be expected that other alliances have a very different idea with regards treaties than NPO: i.e. we think they mean something. Any structural advantage that our alliances have over yours was entirely self-created. It is your insistence on set builds and the inability of your members with more economic ability to expand that has created this situation for you.
  18. Prior to your attacks on TMC there was next to no reason for Farksphere to enter the war. The fact that you still attacked TMC, despite it being plainly evident that they had a treaty with Fark, and that Farksphere honours its treaties, is proof positive that you had a desire to bring us into the war. This being the case I cannot accept that OD attacks on allies of TCW, who they knew TCW had an obligation to defend, were not intended to bring TCW into the war. I am not fighting you because I hate you. There are NPO members I regularly chat to, I know people in your alliance from other places it exists. I am fighting you because whatever respect I have for the NPO, I have far more love for a game I have invested time and money into playing. The fact that the NPO has, for the duration of its history across multiple games, failed to realise that these sorts of activities only persist while there is an effective opposition to one group is not the fault of those fighting it. The fact that we realise that our communities are more important than our pixels is also not our fault, however it is the reason I will not stop fighting until OD's attempts to crush any meaningful alliances which could present any threat to them ends. Peace is in your interest. If you go for it, the game survives and so do you. If you don't go for it, the game dies or you do. I see, however that you've made your decision. Enjoy the battlefield, I'm still smiling. Rant ends
  19. I am. I think rest of the world is going to win.
  20. If you truly want people to have fun in this game, here's what you should do. Stop cooperating with those who don't to keep peoples score down. BK and NPO want to kill this game, and as someone who's invested considerable time and money in it, that's something I don't want to see. Use your nations to hit BK's low tier, there's a place for anybody in our coalition.
  21. OD is pretty fash honestly. If they were a real life organisation, the way they act would see them meeting several criteria on Britt's identifiers of fascism checklist, specifically numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 12, 13, and 14. Have I missed any? See for yourself here: http://home.earthlink.net/~eldonenew/fascism.htm
  22. Enjoy peace. But remember, if ever you tire of it, that according to the IQ new law of treaties, a treaty actually means nothing. Therefore, although you have signed your NAP, feel free to rejoin when it suits you.
  23. Perhaps if the NPO cared about its own treaties, others might start as well? We've got a 6-month NAP that's still running, what did goons think of that?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.