Majima Goro

Sorry for your loss m8.

You mean pseudo bloc?

Alex is dank. Except when he does stupid stuff, he is not doing stoopid stuff. Here is a stoopid fluffy furball for you. *gives stoopid fluffy furball*

A game is made by its players. So if multiple players says "this is bad for me", it translates to "this is bad for the game". However, I will not tread into that territory right now. This sure makes winning wars more appealing. But it also makes losing them equally unappealing from an alliance perspective. You are literally forcing people to get off beige so that someone can roll them again.

Again, not every alliance is Arrgh. I'm muted or I would give Alex a reason to roll back this update. Plot twist: I'm muted so I cant protest. #ModAbuse.#EatTheMods

Arrgh is a special case. Unlike most alliances, Arrgh doesn't rebuild its members-the members rebuild themselves. However, in an alliance, rebuild is provided by the alliance. The alliance also gives resources and money to the person to fight. All these resources come from your taxes. In most alliances, during wartime, taxes are increased so that the funds for such large scale aids can be generated. The current update makes it impossible for beiged nations to get taxed-it doesnt discriminate between inactive beige nations and active beige nations. This can affect this cycle for aid. In case the enemy decides to cycle beige, the entire alliance will remain beiged for months on end, spending money while gaining none. This will mean post-war, the alliance will need to restart from scratch to regenerate funds for the rebuild. While one can argue this will lead to shorter wars, in wars like the current one where the opposition has a way larger number of people, one of side will be making way less than the other. Another point raised is that members will deposit taxes on their own in beige. How this has two problems. First, the member will not give it- it's like asking a pirate to hand over their loot, why will they. Secondly, they cant deposit them if blockaded- yes, you can be taxed while blockaded. If the enemy is smart enough, they can literally keep you blockaded and beiged to hurt the alliance way more than they used to. Plus, this thread isnt about saying "Dont tax the beige". We are saying "Dont tax the active beige". I think the above answer will satisfy your question as well. Once again, your typical alliance isnt Arrgh and cannot work without taxes due to the sheer difference in fund generating ideologies. While this update will be a boon for Arrgh who can loot more, this update will be a dead stop for alliances that run on an economic funding. You are working on the assumption that there will be a raider who breaks that beige cycle. Moreover, even if a nation can get 6 or 7 days of beige, they wont be taxed. Please remember that being in beige means you cannot attack or be attacked. This update is literally forcing your members to leave beige. Moreover, your theoritical will be raider seems like a slot-filler hired to beige someone to allow them recovery time.

Cycle beiging is a thing. You basically let one of your people beige and two people sit on him.

The new patch to fix exploitation of inactive nations for taxation is indeed needed. HOWEVER, the current form isnt the way to go about it. Currently, ALL beige nations are exempted from paying taxes. However, in reality, this should only affect inactive nations. This can be exploited to mass-beige and cycle-beige alliances to kill off their entire economy. Agreed it will make wars shorter but with malicious alliances hell-bent on killing of their enemies, they can effectively keep the cycle-beiging going on for months. My suggestion is: Add another condition to the new update so that beige nations INACTIVE FOR X DAYS are exempted from taxes. We can have a discussion on what this X should be. Although generally, it should be a time limit between 14 days to 28 days.

You did not get the context, nvm

Your math is awful

A simple metric is calculating the money keked ig and converting it to credits and converting credits to irl money. If we think 3T is keked, that is around 20000 credits. 1 credit is 5$. Then, it is $100,000 keked. Tldr, wars make the sheep rich. Yep lmao I've learnt to add pictures to videos, work with spreadsheets, modify codes and annoy people from being at this game. I've also learnt the art of shitting as well as acting as a total retar*(watch goons report me for calling myself a mentally challenged person lol). Tldr, the game has taught me a lot but with the toxicity going around, I am literally planning on exiting it.

Is it the famed 420 year NAP?

Betting 1 food Col B will post a forum post to counter this.

This tax bracket is the default 0/0 tax bracket I have in the alliance. Despite it, I am getting taxed 10/10 No, this isnt a glitch and in reality I am getting taxed. The tax bracket ID is also the same as the default. Pls fix. Oh and I am unable to change my forum name idk why. Everytime I try, it says success but I see no change to the name. Bug in my end or not, idk.

The achievement system has undoubtedly been one of the best updates to the game. But we arent utilizing it to the maximum. What if alliances could have awards of their own? We have all seen the war badges and what not in nation descriptions. But what if they were made into an in-game feature? Alliance-specific Achievements are special achievement added by Alliance Leaders at a cost of 1 credit. Officer+ can allot these achievements to specific nations. Once allotted, the nation will get a notification similar to what we get when we unlock an achievement currently. The nation can choose to display the achievement in its achievement section if it wants.

KITTY!!! *Pats and huggles*

Hey, i just realized they forgot a few people like NPO, tCW, UPN, Acadia and stuff like that. Also the gazillion micros as well

How many blocs are you people in now?

Pantheon were just unlucky lol. And Gorge was super lucky. The bank loot forced the offshores to send over the funds to the main alliance. And Gorge got super lucky. Also, panth had over 10b. Only one of their offshores held 20b worth of stuff. So I'd say they had atleast 25b worth of stuff. This invalidates the entire CB since the numbers are wrong.

Yes. Go wild. Post polls for everything you want.

We stand with Hong Kong! Also, stay safe.

Me be like:

Love it when people go from "we are best buddies reeee" to just "reeeeee". All such allies are useless and musnt be trusted at all.

1) If you are 13, you pretty much know what terms like that mean. 2) I want this thread to continue so that mods can tell me what is correct or not. I clearly smell the malice in your reports and hence will not take advice or suggestions from you.

My bio is against child porn not for it. However, if it is objectionable, I'll change it.