True King

Well, was mostly saying GOONS don’t seem to have a valid CB & would have confirmed with those who do. Although don’t really plan to recruit from them. Just have no idea why goons are involved unless a raid.

Well, unless GOONS can give a valid CB they’re attacking for; would probably accept any former members into my alliance unless those who do have a valid a CB have issue with it.

Did Pantheon ever even want reps from all the regular members?

Well, never ending only works as long as the war is going; although not sure if you were joking on that name to begin with. lol. Since no war lasts truely forever.

How brave of GOONS to attack TCM when they were already at war with 3 other alliances. I think the real reason they downvoted my post regarding MDAPs being mandatory is they know they're screwed if Astra actually decided to counter them. Nobody would have their back on that I'd bet. (I mean I can see why The Pantheon and allies are still hitting; although considering Jazz deleted after it was realized his accusations against Nokia were pure hyperbole, they have noCB to even keep hitting TCM, lol )

Although wouldn’t work as soon as it ends, even if that is over half a year away,

I see GOONs downvoting me explaining what a MDAP actually is; as if don’t like facts posted or don’t like learning anything. Never said Astra would actually honor the MDAP; they’re Astra & didn’t even know what a MDAP was when creating the bloc. Lol. Although stay dumb goons, but publicly displaying you don’t understand the meanings of the different types of treaties wouldn’t give me confidence in Goons as an ally if I was one.

Actually plenty of the big alliances with no idea what they’re doing or why; if willing to do anything at all who are the real drain of players ending up where they’ll never make a difference & if they do have an impact on something it will be because another alliance wanted them to; often not even knowing why or towards end. Although at the same time even a micro can impact the actions of much bigger alliances just with by saying an idea publicly which catches on, with most in mass member alliances never knowing the reasons behind what they’re doing regardless. Part of reason Col B is pretty much under direct control of Roq is most of the other leaders don’t know how to make good decisions. Actually not many competent leader in most of the Top Ranked alliances...

Thing is micros start small. I was under 10 for a while fighting a bunch of alliances; although up to 15 now. Would expect to be over 20 within a few months. Keeping membership small on the AA for tactical reasons while at war can be smart as well; so can't just judge an alliance by their member count; when having members on the AA isn't even really required. Edit; Also have no intention of even staying a micro, just for the last few months war has prioritized other stuff. Also not a rush to get a bunch of other members on the AA; when we have others to build up first.

Maybe this will teach you not to sign MDAPs anymore, but those mean you have their back no matter what. MDoAP is when there is some kind of option based on the circumstances. Although since MDAPs isn't even recognized as a real type of treaty in this game, not to surprising you wouldn't understand the commitment which comes with them.

lol, lets kill of the game by preventing any new alliances from forming. So just the same dinosaurs leading the same old alliances bring more stale ideas, once they're past their prime & still holding onto power despite no goals beyond self preservation anymore. Sounds like a great idea to prevent change from the status quo! Although suggesting from now on everyone should just join the same old alliances led by the same people, with nobody being able to bring something new to the table sounds hard to believe you can be serious about anyways.

Well, yeah. They kinda did & spoke of wanting to do more business in the future. Although don't think I've heard from them since. Also had to temporarily make someone else AA Owner of Kingsglaive when I did it; so was kind of out of my way.

All my customers have all approached me & offered that. So was some easy money, although mostly if someone comes to me with a business proposition worth my time for money; that's usually enough. Although never been offered below or above $10m to do it. lol

I do it for only $10m each, so that's kind of a rip off. lol

I wonder how many uinvolved alliances would do nothing as the last pockets of resistance fighting the creation of UniPolar World are completely stomped out; as everyone who might have been able to fight on their side are completely eliminated or have crippling terms preventing any actions as the last not allied to the Hegemony are taken out next? Those who support freedom don't need protection from any major alliances or have anything to fear. There is nothing to fear if doing the right thing. Those who wish to preserve freedom from everywhere on Orbis can join LAN regardless of current sides if they don't trust their own coalition to preserve liberty on Orbis or rather unite around freedom. Guess we'll find out if this is the moment of truth for Orbis or those who think there will be a next time are to optimistic; if not enough alliances act the potential threat. This Global War has been interesting at least & original name quite fitting at least. Hasn't been boring. However it doesn't need to end with any tyrannical hegemony emerging.

Goodnight, Sweet Prince

Honestly I only read up to " Have you ever imagined the Possibility Of the extinction of Micros?" & gave my response. Although extinction of micros would happen when the game dies & no new alliances are being formed. Some micros are weaker than other & can perish from conflict with even the weakest mass member alliances. Then there are some which can be capable of more than many of the top alliances, who lack the leadership to be effective toward anything other than doing as other alliances command of them. Which has more power? The Micro is free choose their own path and have whatever effect they want on the world or the mass member alliance unable to do anything due to leadership serving the leaders of other alliances? The Micro who alliances like KT, Arrgh or GOONS aren't even a factor of concern toward their existence, free from the control of other stronger alliances has more power than the large servant AA.

Most alliances start as micros, so as long as new alliances are created they won’t go extinct. Some perish and others don’t, they vary just as the capabilities of the top listed alliances vary. Biggest is GPWC without its own gov yet even.

Getting hit by 3 down declares doing double buys at different times, as you militarize up to try fighting off the previous ones sounds fun at least.

Should actually be an exciting change if he's going to do something during the war, rather than just imbalance things. lol

Comment did seem kind of ridiculous and hard to take seriously. even if I'm not sure where from.

I didn't read the thread, just the OP. So not sure what comments you're talking about, although I agree in principle. Although I found his comment on wanting to delete me funny more than anything else if referring to that, lol

Personally I like the idea of alliances being in one bloc rather than several, thought BK might be going in a more interesting direction until they signed up for another mini-bloc not long after. Now I'm not sure what to think of it.

Also just people randomly attacking with new wars; you wouldn't just have one time during the day where people might be able to catch you with a double buy; instead every 2 hours you could possibly be attacked with your opponent doing a double buy on you. Personally I think already people can gain a pretty big edge quickly just attacking before turn change if they take ground and air control. If every 2 hours people can potentially also do a double buy as they try quickly taking ground and air control from you; might just be down to nuking by the time you realize you're at war.