Aisha Greyjoy

This is starting to feel a bit like an avian encounter. "This is what not to do if a bird shits on you..."

When you play the game of thrones...

I tried that, not the script part, the waiting part. Had to resolve after a minute or two.

Hopefully we won't redo the same war in 3 months.

And those air strikes on your ships...are air strikes NOT on your infra.

Nuclear Weapons are a loser's weapon. Accordingly, the losers of this current war should decommission their Nukes now. And the loser of each war in the future should do so as well. Winners don't need nukes, so the world will be safe with Nukes in the hands of winners.

I'm pretty sure SoS is a member. Also, everyone in Rose, Alpha, SK and NK. So..spies away!

Alpha's erratic leadership is unlikely to lead to success for their allies. NK had balls going in on the loser side, but maybe post war evaluate who you want to trust with your pixels.

Less treaties = good?

I want there to be a multi-polar world. But three poles will always be two versus one. Any boardgamer knows five, seven or nine are the optimal number of players(diplomacy, supremacy, civilization). I applauded Rose and SK for trying to have a third sphere. And I don't blame them for tying up with the other loser sphere to take down the top dog. In a 3 sphere world, its always 1 vs 2 and 3. But three isn't enough spheres. I wish the paperless sphere would get a little larger. Maybe SK could join that one with Guardian, it'd be a nice little sphere, plus a traditional grouping of SK-G-TeST. Then we could try to roll VE and fail and TeST could switch sides. Ok, maybe that didn't work out so well last time.

Being in SK gov at the time, SK didn't figure out who leaked it. We had a technical backdoor left open, that someone used. We had no evidence it was Ragnar, merely the salty taste of his (then) recent bitter departure to fuel speculation. If Guardian is a minor bit player, why did 2 front page alliances preempt Guardian 5 days ago?

Farms: 12 Food Grown: 0

Putting the guy who hates your ally in charge of your FA really does kind of set the future direction, no?

Man, it seems like you are laying out a bunch of suboptimal choices you made that helped us get to here.

The obvious answer is that the competent winners each take a loser alliance under their wing as a protectorate/slave/farm and then the winners battle it out next war, with the losers fighting on behalf of the winners. Maybe the winners can even stop fighting, so when TKR gets mad at t$, they'll send TKR-Slave-Rose to hit t$-Slave-UPN. Then when UPN and Rose are totally wrecked again, TKR and t$ can make up and end the war and demand huge reps from UPN to TKR and Rose to t$.

NPO is performing exceptionally well by the standards of the incompetents they've chosen to ally with. When you want to up your game, come over to the dark $ide. Edit: TeSt will obviously do some major Rekkage this war.

Be broken, O peoples, and be shattered; And give ear, all remote places of the earth. Gird yourselves, yet be shattered; Gird yourselves, yet be shattered.

Dude, I'm still waiting for Guardian to hit VE again. Its like a tradition.

Boring drama is boring. Arghh, doing what Arghh does is cool!

NPO, brahs, you guys are way too good for your allies. Time to cut the fat and come over to the other side.

How bad can it be after fighting one round?

The only worse war I've seen was the one I helped plan....so, I'll refrain from throwing stones here.

He dies, she dies, everybody dies.

Welcome! And thanks!

May this war be long. Very, very long. I am asking Orbis for a thirty week war.