AwesomeNova

From what I'm gathering, the debate isn't happening because Epi wanted exclusive streaming rights to said debate on a PRIVATE server. There's no point in having a debate in the first place if one side has full control on how people view it. Also, I do not care about what Epi has to say about this. No reasonable person would want a debate with the terms outlined by him, and I'm against any debate like that on principle. Either everyone can view it from any source or no one can, no in between.

Team Gardening Grandmas

At risk of acting like a jerk, this sounds like a weaker form of spying. In warfare, spies are primarily used to destroy military units without having to be at war with other nations. Merely disabling improvements is not an appealing option when you can just kill large chunks of someone's military or, if you're at war with them, just lob a nuke or missile to destroy their improvements.

It's already humiliating to them to not even muster 60 votes last round. They're sore losers who are mad at Rose being voted out of the first round, and their boasts about their net damage in the early stages of war shows that they have no endgame other than throwing a tantrum. And to any Cam members who downvoted this reply, you just proved my point. Edit: grammar

Military is the thing you need for net, but whatever makes you sleep at night

That's a lot of words for someone that's losing a blitz your alliance started

This event single-handedly brought me back to the forums. What a clever event to host

Damn, it really is like an election Edit: grammar error

GDP per capita does affect gameplay, at least in any meaningful way. Commerce and rss production matters more than GDP per capita or even GDP

Yeah, the mobile version of the web page isn't as optimized for smaller screens as it should be. I say that as someone who spent most of PnW on my phone

Join Rose. It has one of the best growth programs in the game and, it more importantly has a vibrant community.

This is arguably worse than wardodging. They panicked and broke trust with their alliance in order to hug pixels, which ironically result in them more losing pixels than they saved. Kinda a hot take: if you leave an alliance to preserve rss or infra without withdrawing your rss from the alliance bank, the alliance does not owe you the rss you forgot to withdraw.

If the purpose of this project is to promote cooperation between alliances, then it isn't a good way to do that. From what I understand it, you have to find nations with a government type and social and economic policies that are most compatible with yours to make the most money using this project. If that's the case, then the most profitable types and policies will be found quickly and become the meta for the rest of the project;s existence, and alliances will mandate certain government types and social/economic policies to be chosen by their members, thereby ensuring the benefits of the projects stays within the alliance. Considering that there are plenty of projects that either boost a nation's income, this projects seems unnecessary at the moment. I'm not sure how this adds anything to the game. Is this supposed to be a source of income without adding money to the economy of Orbis?

This seems like just more bloat for the game. Commerce serves a similar purpose to what you propose, and there are other projects that boost rss production. I'd rather have the devs improve existing mechanics than add fluff. Also, IQ isn't a good measure of one's intelligence, and I think "education level" is a much better term to because fits more with your suggestion than "IQ."

Why did this topic about someone's attempt to peddle their NFTs get necroposted twice? NFTs are becoming less relevant as they plummet in value, assuming they are still plummeting (they might already be worthless)

Yes, but you get less money back than the amount spent on the same units of infra

I guess you can say that the Johnsons’ side is soft implementing the new beige mechanics that’s being discussed

I've never really thought about this. For being such a useful feature, I'm surprised there isn't a dedicated button for the Bulk Import page. It's poor design to have it buried i every city's "import" page.

I'd much rather have the beige mechanics be reworked than add more nation-v-nation war outcomes, though this suggesting isn't bad.

An interesting idea, I guess, but wouldn't it detract from the player-led side of banking and loans? Idk, it seems kinda pointless.

I don’t normally post in the forums during war because I find it too toxic for me to handle it (though this global war was less toxic than NPOLT), but after reading through this thread, I’m frustrated at how vehemently unwilling you are at accepting any criticism from anyone. In your search for the truth, you destroyed the trust that others had and pushed everyone who had the info you want away from you. You soured your relationship with AA leaders to the point that they may not give information to others in the future. You thought you had the truth, but you only had a narrative painted by one side. Listen to Kurdanak and don’t do what I did. I’m just bored. Any attempt to reason with Phoenix will be for nothing. They’re an antivaxxer, after all.

I have nothing to critique about this. It’s the perfect suggestion for the mobile version. Though my phone is small (I use an iPhone 5s) it’s still annoying to reach for the top of the page for things like trading. I do have two computers that I can use, but I’m always on the mobile version in my phone because a) I don’t want my P&W session seen by my high school while I go online and b) the family computer is a Mac from around 2010 and incredibly slow at times. So I’m stuck with the mobile version of P&W. Having the navigation bar on the bottom makes it so much easier to be on mobile for P&W. Please implement this, Alex.

Wind power plants right now are useless for most people, so buffing them would make them a viable option for upper-mid to upper tier nation. I’d suggest increasing the cost to build a wind power plant to at or above the cost of a nuclear power plant, as well. Side note: the formula for powered infra can be simplified to land/2, and the formula for the operational cost can also be simplified to $2*land.

That’s exactly what happened to me!I thought it was just me, so I ignored it.