AwesomeNova

From what I'm gathering, the debate isn't happening because Epi wanted exclusive streaming rights to said debate on a PRIVATE server. There's no point in having a debate in the first place if one side has full control on how people view it. Also, I do not care about what Epi has to say about this. No reasonable person would want a debate with the terms outlined by him, and I'm against any debate like that on principle. Either everyone can view it from any source or no one can, no in between.

Team Gardening Grandmas

At risk of acting like a jerk, this sounds like a weaker form of spying. In warfare, spies are primarily used to destroy military units without having to be at war with other nations. Merely disabling improvements is not an appealing option when you can just kill large chunks of someone's military or, if you're at war with them, just lob a nuke or missile to destroy their improvements.

It's already humiliating to them to not even muster 60 votes last round. They're sore losers who are mad at Rose being voted out of the first round, and their boasts about their net damage in the early stages of war shows that they have no endgame other than throwing a tantrum. And to any Cam members who downvoted this reply, you just proved my point. Edit: grammar

Military is the thing you need for net, but whatever makes you sleep at night

That's a lot of words for someone that's losing a blitz your alliance started

This event single-handedly brought me back to the forums. What a clever event to host

Damn, it really is like an election Edit: grammar error

GDP per capita does affect gameplay, at least in any meaningful way. Commerce and rss production matters more than GDP per capita or even GDP

Yeah, the mobile version of the web page isn't as optimized for smaller screens as it should be. I say that as someone who spent most of PnW on my phone

Join Rose. It has one of the best growth programs in the game and, it more importantly has a vibrant community.

This is arguably worse than wardodging. They panicked and broke trust with their alliance in order to hug pixels, which ironically result in them more losing pixels than they saved. Kinda a hot take: if you leave an alliance to preserve rss or infra without withdrawing your rss from the alliance bank, the alliance does not owe you the rss you forgot to withdraw.

If the purpose of this project is to promote cooperation between alliances, then it isn't a good way to do that. From what I understand it, you have to find nations with a government type and social and economic policies that are most compatible with yours to make the most money using this project. If that's the case, then the most profitable types and policies will be found quickly and become the meta for the rest of the project;s existence, and alliances will mandate certain government types and social/economic policies to be chosen by their members, thereby ensuring the benefits of the projects stays within the alliance. Considering that there are plenty of projects that either boost a nation's income, this projects seems unnecessary at the moment. I'm not sure how this adds anything to the game. Is this supposed to be a source of income without adding money to the economy of Orbis?

This seems like just more bloat for the game. Commerce serves a similar purpose to what you propose, and there are other projects that boost rss production. I'd rather have the devs improve existing mechanics than add fluff. Also, IQ isn't a good measure of one's intelligence, and I think "education level" is a much better term to because fits more with your suggestion than "IQ."

Why did this topic about someone's attempt to peddle their NFTs get necroposted twice? NFTs are becoming less relevant as they plummet in value, assuming they are still plummeting (they might already be worthless)