Pretty much what the title suggests. The activity log includes two things about nations leaving the alliance which is them leaving (for another alliance) and nations deleting themselves voluntarily. However, nations who are deleted from inactivity are not logged making it take some time for an alliance to find out who is gone.
Honestly, I was mostly referring to the part where it backfired for TKR. But I 100% agree with you that this treaty will just be treated as a glorified NAP.
Doesn't that depend on the price of resources at a given point? If it were at 1,500 infra I'd agree but at 1,000, I'm a bit hesitant to agree with you there.
What's the difference between alliance security and defence overlook?
Good luck to your new government and another good luck to being a democratic alliance!
I don't think the most important thing about protecotares is "if you attack them, we'll attack you". It's more like "we're cool with this alliance" and just wants to dissuade people from attacking said alliance in the first place, rather than jumping straight to the conclusion that x must attack y because y attacked z.
While trying to register an account on the forums, I encountered a problem where I had to fill in the blank from the homepage.
It seemed simple enough until I found out the line which was needed was not available on the mobile version of the game but was on the PC version.
My point of view.
Yenroh's point of view.
(Apologies for the image sizes, I have no way of changing them on my phone)