Justin076

I'm fine with individuals choosing to leave the game but for an alliance leader to encourage his own 100+ members to delete is disgusting and shameful. Leo you truly are an absolute piece of garbage. BK members, if you wanna leave the game go ahead, but don't do it because your (NOT)leader told you to. Your government has drug you through an eight month war and was content with your ally cheating, which is why this mess started. Take a step back and consider your options.

Let the door hit you on the way out

I mean we all knew this was the case, I’m glad it’s finally been dealt with. They’ve been holding half the game at war for over half a year and are paying a hundreds of people to make nations so they can farm them and build an UNFAIR advantage. How did NPO and the people currently condemning the action ever this what was going on was appropriate? The punishments are weak, however I understand Alex’s intention to not want to kill an entire alliance. NPO people should be thanking him for being so lenient with their incredibly illegal activity. To all the cry babies saying you’re leaving over this, LEAVE! I wanna play this game fair and not with a bunch of cheaters! If the game loses people who care, it wouldn’t be a game anymore if NPO’s cheating continued.

Gotta give it to these guys, their will is unmatched and they blitz better than 95% of alliances.....

Many lost GPAer’s are rolling over in their graves after this one. Lmao this is cute. @kalev60

Alright cool thanks.

IQ be like

01/23 11:41 am President Yang_Cheng of Democratic Shanghai ordered a naval attack upon your nation of Kingdom of Cape Breton. The attack was an immense triumph. President Yang_Cheng's forces lost 0 ships, while your defenders lost 0 ships. You used 0 tons of munitions and 0 tons of gasoline defending the attack. The attack destroyed 2.39 infrastructure in the city of Charles II and destroyed 1 improvement, an air force base plus 18 aircraft inside. This loss has resulted in a naval blockade on your nation. To break the blockade you must execute a naval attack that is a success, another player must achieve an immense triumph naval attack on your opponent, or you must destroy all of your opponent's ships. All pending trade offers you have created have been cancelled and refunded to your nation and you will be unable to trade with other nations until the blockade is over. I was naval attacked today and consequently lost a hanger. However the 18 aircraft that should've been destroyed weren't. I was at max air 2,160 at the time of the attack and still at 2,160 after the attack. I didn't lose the 18 aircraft that I should've as a result of the improvement loss. I did verify that I did lose the improvement, I had 2,160 aircraft with only enough hangers to support 2,142, very weird. I'm not reporting this so someone can remove those 18 aircraft, but might be worth looking in to.

This is interesting....

Dude, take a deep breath. I don't have issues with IF or Max, we had a bit of a history, positive. I was poking fun at the wording of the thread.

My apple watch's ecg monitor would agree. You guy's are too easy.

Why not just write, “we can’t fight” and save us the time of reading that post?

Where was your smarts and wisdom when we needed it? You my friend have got it all going on.

This is the talk of a guy who's totally willing to end the war. If only our coalition would get more reasonable and accept their very fair terms of tens of billions in reps+more.

His posting has definitely changed from before I went on a five month break. It’s like night a day. All those years of paranoia, believing everyone was out to get him is coming out and hard. The big bad PnW boogey man has sent him off the deep end.

I've taken negotiation classes in business school and have been involved in union contract negotiations. I can tell you that proposing unrealistic terms isn't negotiation. When making a proposal, ask yourself if you really think they're realistic and in good faith, heck ask yourself if you'd ever accept them. Walking into negotiations with the terms ya'll have had prove that you really aren't interested in peace or ending the conflict, so why should anyone on our side sit down with you and listen to what you have to say. Your side has to show some sort of willingness to end the war, and be real with our side. Both sides have to try and mend some sort of relationship and lower the toxicity levels enough to sit down and have a real talk to end the war, but the first step has to be taken by your side in proposing real terms so that our side has a willingness to open their ears and have a real conversation.

And negotiations aren't supposed to start with one party walking in and making unrealistic demands.

For some reason I struggle to sympathize with a group like BK. Hacking is unacceptable, but BK's eternal struggle to kill the game is more of a crime.

Not sure what's going on here but I take it IQ was being a shit ally again. What a bunch of dorks.

Wars are so long that alliances can enter and exit several times, against opposing sides. What a time to be a alive.

You're implying that our-side is the only one facing inactivity and deletions? Scrolling through your sides alliance membership pages I can see just as much as a problem. Regardless, I'm beating a dead horse whenever I say anything to anyone on your side. Like talking to a wall.

I see Leo's head didn't explode yet from the pressure of his ever-growing ego and therefore this war is still going on. The decrease in activity can be pegged on the agonizing month's long war. Yes people delete in wars, they are weak. But in these long wars where nations are essentially deemed useless and sat on for periods longer than two months can force anyone to just peace out or delete. These long wars are the death of the game, so you've got what you wanted IQ.

They're absolutely meaningless, forever in the shadow of their BK-IQ overlords. Doesn't matter how aggressive they are, they'll never doing anything on their own and will always come to the side of daddy BK/IQ. In that, they are no different than Vanguard was.