Ayayay

Oh god, not sneezing! The horror!

Welcome!

Ayutthaya

Opens topic

I remember Sheepy saying that he was going to add this months ago. Sheepy, add nowzorz!

Welcome!

It only applies to NATO allies, not Ukraine. Although that much isn't surprising and Russia hasn't and won't attempt any attack on a NATO nation because they know NATO would have no choice but to respond in force.

I seriously doubt Russia has any intention of invading Estonia, Latvia, or any other NATO country. Russia isn't going to mount an overt invasion anywhere under NATO protection, so this commitment won't have to be backed up. Just tough words to save face after the "We don't have a strategy for ISIL" comment.

I thought it was limited to 99% anyways?

Unless sheepy has changed his mind anyone can use the pip.

You call the cops like you are supposed to. You think if you have a gun and you shoot him you can throw his body in a dumpster?

Type their name at the bottom of the alliance screen and click go. Kind of a silly process and you should be able to just click accept without typing the name.

Actually the police are receiving military equipment for free directly from the Department of Defense. While the War on Drugs is definitely a problem, the War on Terror directly lead to this situation. They were receiving military equipment before 9/11 but at least they were paying for it. What's wrong with my first sentence? Pistols do account for the most deaths but that's because most people own it. Pistols are cheap and readily available, therefor by nature most shootings are going to be done by them. We should put in checks that prevent sale to mentally unstable people (like the Sandy Hook shooter) and do background checks to prevent sale to the people who are more likely going to rob and steal. You have to take a test to show that you can drive, I see no reason not to have a similar one that shows you are capable of owning a weapon. Exactly. That's why we need people who buy guns to be analyzed. If someone is at a higher than average risk to use the gun in a violent, unprovoked manner against another person they should be denied the right to buy guns. Like the rules against shouting "fire" in a crowded theater, technically your freedom of speech is being limited but it is limited so that others can be safe.

Good luck;Have fun

Well considering the fact that the Wahhabi movement could be severely weakened by removing them from power in Saudi Arabia and we still haven't done anything about it in the past few decades, yes, we are at fault. ISIS want's us to put boots on the ground to gain the support of the moderate Sunni. Needless to say we shouldn't. We should however try to get local powers to intervene. Supporting the Kurds is a risky maneuver since it could hurt our ally Turkey in a few years.

I should set my stance on this issue since I've been less than serious most of the time. People should not be able to purchase anything above a pistol. You also need to pass a training course and be mentally stable. I also doubt a gun law would ever pass that would take away guns people already own. Especially considering the fact that you can still buy a handful of miniguns that were sold into the civilian market before the law went into place banning them. I have seen Iraq, it was far less violent when they didn't have guns under Saddam. I also find it laughable that you think we are anything like Iraq. 1. The militarization of the police force is a direct consequence of the war on terror. Changing gun ownership laws won't have an effect on it. 2. We are the leading weapons manufacture, we spend 40-45% of the entire world's military spending. But, again, changing gun ownership laws won't effect that because that is spent by the government on defense and has nothing to do with what a consumer spends. That guy in the video is pretty hypocritical, he denounces using children as political ammo but then turns around and uses his dead comrades as political ammo. Also, should congress take up arms and go overseas with the marines when they declare war? Really appears to be nothing but rhetoric which I tire of. I agree that the bill should not have been forced through but they did it before for same-sex marriage, where was the outrage when they gave men and women the right to marry their own sex? Or when they did the same for teacher evaluations? How dare they evaluate teachers!

Yea! Rankings!

The problem is that there are 2 main arguments for the second amendment. 1. The idea is that an armed populace is harder to subjugate by a foreign invader (which, as the arsenal of Democracy, is not something we need worry about) 2. So we can fight against our own tyrannical government. (Which is again, ludicrous, how is a civilian supposed to fight against A-10's or Abrams?) Both of the arguments are outdated. We are the world leader in military strength, and with NATO behind us we can take on the rest of the world. Even if the worst came to pass and someone invaded us, we have over 5,000 nuclear warheads, you can extrapolate from there. A rebellion, on the other hand, would need to be supported by the American military to have any hope of success. Your "Barbie doll" AR-15 is, weather you want to admit it or not, not going to help you.

BoC might have a more organized government

She would have been unable to kill him without a full-auto uzi in her hands. Anyways, a 9 year old can shoot a Uzi but it is illegal for me to own a fully functional Abrams? I just want one, that's it. And maybe a Bradley as well. A F-22 would be nice too. Also a Predator Drone. I can't have any of those but that child is allowed to kill someone? Where's the justice?

Zoe Quinn and Kotaku hypocrisy incoming?

The page is working for me, although I already created my city a few days ago.

You're just a great person to mention. The people that don't know you tend to not like you. The jokes just make themselves. (Also Lambadelta ragequit so I need a new person) Anyways, joke thread Job interview: "What's your greatest weakness?" "Honesty." "I don't think honesty is a weakness." "I don't give a !@#$ what you think."

I meant stopped in that they stopped it themselves, same with CS.

Wrong alliance